Hi,
There is an intriguing article in the flex cookbook on the adobe site about
reading in MXML at runtime and using the XML object to create components
at runtime. While
I don't totally get how this works as there are no code samples, but
very vague actually, but it states:
"Let’s consider, fo
I think they're just stating that the mx.modules package exists. The
sentence "We also know Flex2 knows how to read MXML at runtime because the
compiler knows how to convert MXML into GUI Objects" doesn't inspire
confidence that they know what they're talking about. Since it's possible
that they
Yeah, ummm, my advice would be ignore that article. That's one of the
effects of having an article submission process that allows anyone to submit
anything. I know the cookbook is supposed to be user generated and reviewed,
but anyone from Adobe want to exercise a little editorial control? I
would
I'm curious...how many people would find runtime MXML to be important to
them?
Ely.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug McCune
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex cookbook article:
lemented in a
> reasonable amount of time.
>
> I’m curious…how many people would find runtime MXML to be important to
> them?
>
> Ely.
>
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *On Behalf Of *Doug McCune
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:47 PM
easonable amount of time.
>>
>> I’m curious…how many people would find runtime MXML to be important to
>> them?
>>
>> Ely.
>>
>> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *On Behalf Of *Doug McCune
>> *Sent:* Thursday, M
amount of time.
>>>
>>> I’m curious…how many people would find runtime MXML to be important to
>>> them?
>>>
>>> Ely.
>>>
>>> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Doug McCune
On Friday 18 May 2007, Austin Kottke wrote:
> more scaleable and integration with the server end would be a lot more
> feasible. (As in doing HTTPRequests where serverside MXML could be
> generated through Velocity/JSP and then given back to the ui)
I think you'd be a lot better off returning a d
ject:* Re: [flexcoders] Flex cookbook article: Flex2 XML Reader
Can Create UIComponents
Yeah, ummm, my advice would be ignore that article. That's one of the
effects of having an article submission process that allows anyone to
submit anything. I know the cookbook is supposed to be user gene
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex cookbook article: Flex2 XML Reader Can Create
UIComponents
Ely,
I find runtime MXML something that would be invaluable.
It is something that if implemented could make developing in flex a lot more
scaleable and integration with the serve
Yea, I get it. It sounds really cool though -- I'd love to be able to
see dynamically created
MXML and not have it to be server side (Apache IIS mod). This would make
flex's value
a lot higher. I suppose that there is some class in the flex framework
which does this however,
converts MXML to ob
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug McCune
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex cookbook article: Flex2 XML
Reader Can Create UIComponents
Yeah, ummm, my advice would be ignore that article. T
From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *On Behalf Of *Austin Kottke
> *Sent:* 17 May 2007 21:09
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Flex cookbook article: Flex2 XML Reader
> Can Create UIComponents
>
> Ely,
>
> I find r
arious
>>> approaches to this. The more you reduce it, the easier it would
>>> be to
>>> replicate…removing repeaters, implicit arrays, default properties,
>>> etc. would get you down to something that could be implemented in a
>>> reasonable amount of t
rs, implicit arrays, default properties,
>>> etc. would get you down to something that could be implemented in a
>>> reasonable amount of time.
>>>
>>> I'm curious…how many people would find runtime MXML to be
>>> important to
>>> them?
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
