Please VOTE for SDK-16016
(https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16016), in addition to
SDK-16897 (https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16897), if you want
tab key support to be fixed, including usage in item renderers.
get a fix.
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maciek Sakrejda
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:17 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
>
>
> Out of curiosity, I checked
, 2008 4:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Out of curiosity, I checked JIRA and there are only six issues with 100+
votes, so if you've got a lot of friends, you should be able to get in
the Top 10 Most Popular Bugs fairly e
oups.com
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:59:07 -
Alex:
I've got one vote from Jim Abbott on the bug.
How many do I need before it makes a difference?
Paul
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui <[EMAI
ve
been wrong before.
>
> -Alex
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
>
>
> Alex:
>
>
et any money on your bugs being fixed, but I've been wrong
before.
-Alex
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
the framework larger. You
might see some of that by the time Flex 4 ships, but don't count on
it.
>
> -Alex
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 6:04 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.co
Tuesday, September 16, 2008 6:04 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabIndex
Alex:
How does this work against accessibility rules?
First, I am suggesting something that enhances flexibility while
leaving the default behavior alone. Second, the curren
rammer's hack job. I would think
> > that
> > > > Adobe would want a product that attracts business application
> > > > developers, not just web designers. When Adobe's folks (I
assume
> > that
> > > > you are a member
makes looking into
> > > Silverlight ever so much more attractive. If Microsoft won't pay
> > > attention at least you can blame it on them being so big.
> > >
> > > Why don't you run it up the flag pole, take a look at how much
> time
> > >
gt; > find it a useful feature befor dismissing it out of hand.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui wrote:
> > >
> > > No advantages using non-modal popups, just a way to get what you
> > want. I doubt we'll have t
ainst accessibility rules.
> >
> > If you are using ModuleLoader today, you can probably pass the
> ModuleLoader to PopUpManager. There'll probably be some other stuff
> that needs to be fixed up, but that's what I'd try first.
> >
> > From: flexcoder
stuff
that needs to be fixed up, but that's what I'd try first.
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Enhancement, TabI
nager. There'll probably be some other stuff that needs to be fixed up,
but that's what I'd try first.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aceoohay
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders]
Alex:
I am not sure precisely how to do what you are suggesting.
What I currently do is to create modules for each panel, and use
moduleloader to add them to the stage. Are you suggesting that
instead I use PopUpManager instead of moduleLoader?
For my existing application it seems like a lot o
15 matches
Mail list logo
