ok thanks for the explanation Brian...
On 6/16/05, Brian Deitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Clint, you can't use interfaces as the name of
the source in RemoteObject, since we do a Class.forName() call for the
name. It's really not possible for such a thing to ever work, since
somet
Hi Clint, you can't use interfaces as the name of
the source in RemoteObject, since we do a Class.forName() call for the
name. It's really not possible for such a thing to ever work, since
something needs to be instantiated for the RemoteObject. You should be
able to use a class that imp
RemoteObject would need an implementation of an interface
in order to invoke it... how would you specify this? It seems that once you've
specified the implementation you don't really care about the interface
anymore... so you're back to a concrete object.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
3 matches
Mail list logo
