Yeah, probably makes sense. It's just that i use exec for other things too, this is why i know it best. Cheers,Ralf. On 10/11/06, Douglas Knudsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
curious, why use the exex task to call up Java instead of just using the java task? fork="true"
curious, why use the exex task to call up Java instead of just using the java task? fork="true" failonerror="true"
maxmemory="128m" dir="${flexsdk}\frameworks">DKOn 10/11/06, Ralf Bokelberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Not sure, if this
no i haven't, you can do, if you like.
Cheers,
Ralf.
On 10/11/06, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 10:39, Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> > Works like a charm, though i'd prefer not to see these .cache files in
> > my source directory. Unfortunately this doesn't seem
I never did get it to work but I haven't gone back and tried to simplify
what I was doing. I probably need to do that -- start from scratch, get
it working and then try to set up my compile as I need it. I might try
using the task as well, as opposed to the task.
Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> Not s
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 10:39, Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> Works like a charm, though i'd prefer not to see these .cache files in
> my source directory. Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be
> configurable.
That would be nice - have you stuck it through adobe.com/go/wish ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Help
Not sure, if this answered or not, but finally i found my old target.
It looks like this:
Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> i can run it with ant wo problem. What does your ant target look like?
> Cheers,
> Ralf.
>
> On 10/2/06, Paul Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Robert Wąs wrote:
>>
>>> option is:
>>> -incremental
>>> and
and no longer require incremental
compiling from the command line compiler.
From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Spitzer
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:23 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] mxmlc -increment
Hi Paul,
i can run it with ant wo problem. What does your ant target look like?
Cheers,
Ralf.
On 10/2/06, Paul Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Wąs wrote:
> > option is:
> > -incremental
> > and works for me
>
>
> w/ ANT?
>
>
> > Robert Was
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Spitzer wrote:
> >>
> >>
Robert Wąs wrote:
> option is:
> -incremental
> and works for me
w/ ANT?
> Robert Was
>
>
>
> Paul Spitzer wrote:
>>
>> Did anyone ever figure this out? I've having the same problem. I'm
>> trying to use incremental compiling w/ ANT but am getting the following
>> error...
>>
>> "Failed to m
I'm not actually using "increment" as the subject line suggests
(increment reports an error). I have "-incremental=true". ... Here's
what it looks like in my ANT target.
Igor
option is:
-incremental
and works for me
Robert Was
Paul Spitzer wrote:
Did anyone ever figure this out? I've having the same problem. I'm
trying to use incremental compiling w/ ANT but am getting the following
error...
"Failed to match the compile target with ... Administr
put -increment=true;-increment is a boolean paramater, just put true or false to get start workingOn 10/2/06, Paul Spitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did anyone ever figure this out? I've having the same problem. I'm
trying to use incremental compiling w/ ANT
Did anyone ever figure this out? I've having the same problem. I'm
trying to use incremental compiling w/ ANT but am getting the following
error...
"Failed to match the compile target with ... Administrator_405624.cache.
The cache file will not be reused."
The .cache file is created without an
Hi,As far as I know, this should work for UNC paths also. If things have changed I don't know. I was QA on this feature for sometime, while my time in Adobe..-abdulOn 9/6/06,
Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you compile to a network filesystem? Btw
Do you compile to a network filesystem? Btw. is there any possibility to tell the compiler where to put the cache files? Cheers,Ralf. On 9/6/06,
Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sent this on to the engineer and he
thinks it should work. If you can send us more detail
I just checked, it seems to be working fine me. I also see the .cache file..This is console output:-C:\Documents and Settings\aqabiz.DESKTOP2\Desktop\DESKTOP\CursorPool_Flex2>mxmlc -incremental
cursorPoolTest.mxmlLoading configuration file C:\Program Files\Adobe\Flex Builder 2 Plug-in\Flex SDK
I sent this on to the engineer and he
thinks it should work. If you can send us more details as a bug filed via the
wish page (http://www.adobe.com/go/wish)
we can take a look.
Matt
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lance
Delete the cache file and recompile with -increment... Not sure what is exact reason, but guessing cache file is outdated ?-abdulOn 9/2/06,
Lance Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am getting the following message from
the MXMLC compiler when callin
19 matches
Mail list logo