Re: [Flexradio] sequencing the tx1-2-3 outputs

Stu, No trouble at all. The web page indicated that this *new* feature and is not officially available since it is in the /branches/test section of SVN. As such, it is currently under going testing as with all new features found in the SVN branches/test folder. This is alpha/beta code and be

Re: [Flexradio] Windows Vista

I have had the opportunity to test three computers running Vista and three computers running XP. In general I have found that XP yields lower deferred procedure call values when running DPCLAT.EXE, and the difference is significant. I ended up using XP with the computer that is connected to m

Re: [Flexradio] WSPR

Scott, Yes, I've been running WSPR on the SDR-1000 all along. I'm using VAC at 48000 sample rate on the PowerSDR side. My PowerSDS Rx gain is set to -18dB; I determined that value by setting the level which generally gives about a "0dB" baseline in WSJT JT65A mode, and it has worked fine.

[Flexradio] sequencing the tx1-2-3 outputs

all i seem to be having trouble finding the instructions for setting the delay between tx1-2-3 for the switching of the preamp and the power amp any help would be appreciated i am looking for the timing between the tx ports, search on "tx delay" yields nothing. the description of the ports is

[Flexradio] Thanks for help on WSPR

I am receivng at this point and ptt is working find flex but don't see any output when transmitting. Thanks for all help today, we are closer.. Scott ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinf

[Flexradio] 2008/Apr/26 FRF TeamSpeak audio

The 26/Apr Flex Radio Friends TeamSpeak zipped mp3 (53 minutes) is available at: < http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=795 > or < http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx > In this week's recording: Some of the tribulations and perils of Penelope Mike - AA8K ___

Re: [Flexradio] WSPR

Hello Scott, It's running fine here with me on Windows XP SP2 and SDR-1000. I have Windows Audio Devices configured as Virtual Audio Cable 1 for audio out and Virtual Audio Cable 2 for audio in, as it is for MixW and HRD and Winwarbler. WSPR settings are Audio in 0 and Audio out 0. Don't forge

[Flexradio] Petition to Save XP

The "Save XP Petition" Click here: http://weblog.infoworld.com/save-xp/archives/2008/04/save_windows_xp.html -- Regards, TOM BLACKWELL, PO Box 25403, Dallas, Texas 75225 ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-rad

[Flexradio] TT 705 mic

Anyone successfully wire up a TT 705 for the F5K? The problem looks to be the PTT circuit. I can modify it to make it work, but if works without mod it would save the trouble tnx W9OY Be a better fr

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Quoting Frank Brickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat 26 Apr 2008 09:40:31 AM PDT: > Without getting into a long discussion -- the situation isn't really that > complex, nor is it worth spending more than a few further moments on -- the > problem is all in the audio subsystem. Between PowerSDR, PortAu

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Thanks Frank, Nuf said vy 73's Rob AB7CF On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:40:31 -0400 "Frank Brickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Without getting into a long discussion -- the situation isn't really > that > complex, nor is it worth spending more than a few further moments on > -- the > problem is

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

It's a damn sight better than spark gap, that's for sure. See y'all. I have a couple of months' work to do and three weeks to do it. 73 Frank AB2KT On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Edward J White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gang: > I think this is a good question "Is OS Ubuntu a better wa

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Hi Gang: I think this is a good question "Is OS Ubuntu a better way to do SDR." Ed WA3BZT John Brosnahan -- W0UN wrote: >> The problem isn't PowerSDR. It's the lack of integrated, rational support in >> Windows for the kinds of state transitions in the audio subsystem that a QSK >> application req

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Hi John -- On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John Brosnahan -- W0UN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The problem isn't PowerSDR. It's the lack of integrated, rational > > support in > > Windows for the kinds of state transitions in the audio subsystem that a > > QSK > > application requires, es

Re: [Flexradio] WSPR

It is alpha software and it keeps blowing up on my PC. The configuration is the same for WSJT. -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KQ8RP Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:42 AM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] WSPR D

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

"Ergo, is this the key (bad pun) to move PWRSDR development towards Ubuntu and away from MS?" Nope. There is no move *away* from anything. There is the additional embracement of Linux and OS X. I believe what we will find with the new architecture, is that there will be certain configuration

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

> >The problem isn't PowerSDR. It's the lack of integrated, rational support in >Windows for the kinds of state transitions in the audio subsystem that a QSK >application requires, especially when users demand that it also cooperate >transparently with third-party applications over which PowerSDR

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Without getting into a long discussion -- the situation isn't really that complex, nor is it worth spending more than a few further moments on -- the problem is all in the audio subsystem. Between PowerSDR, PortAudio, VAC, and realtime user monitoring requirements, the fact that anything approachin

[Flexradio] WSPR

Does anyone have WSPR set up on the SDR1000 running? I can't seem to get it working. Any config on WSPR and VAC that you can share would be helpful. Thanks Scott KQ8RP ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.b

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Quoting Ed Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat 26 Apr 2008 07:09:57 AM PDT: > Jim, > > When I'm not getting QSK and my CPU is at 8%, I'm wondering where the > bottleneck is. 250ms latency is a real long time in the cpu universe. Indeed.. 250ms is an eternity.. Are you using process explorer or t

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

At 08:36 AM 4/26/2008, Robert Dennison wrote: > running semi break doesn't bother me at >all! The difference is about a tenth of a second very fine for my DX >work! > >vy 73 >Rob >AB7CF After having used our conventional full duplex telephone system, you really wouldn't want to go back to a

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Jim, When I'm not getting QSK and my CPU is at 8%, I'm wondering where the bottleneck is. 250ms latency is a real long time in the cpu universe. 73 Ed W2RF On 26 Apr 2008 at 6:37, Jim Lux wrote: > Quoting Robert Dennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat 26 Apr 2008 05:36:16 AM > PDT: > > > We now

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

Quoting Robert Dennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat 26 Apr 2008 05:36:16 AM PDT: > We now await the first release of the new SW architecture > implementation.. The application just screams for multiprocessor - > multi-threaded implementation and that's the new architecture. In so > many ways, Fl

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

I agree, Ed. V1.10.4 is absolutely terrific in semi QSK mode! Although I'd like to see another dozen or so ops weigh in on their impression of the speed at which QSK goes south. I think the truth is pretty plain: The hardware is ready for full QSK, but not the software. In all but the very f

Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability

The Flex is not going to just get better. It's going to be a whole new radio! 73 Ed W2RF On 25 Apr 2008 at 12:27, Frank Brickle wrote: > Tim -- > > Correct. > > 73 > Frank > AB2KT > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I assume that we can infe