Thought I would provide an update to the post below.
Neal graciously forwarded me the parts list for his smokin PC. This machine
runs an AMD Phenom II X4 Quad-Core processor, 4GB RAM, 320GB HD, dual serial
port and 4 port firewire cards. I received the parts last week and spent a
night
Hi Mike,
You probably saw my email about distorted audio on my Flex 3000. It
would clear up after stopping and starting but would distort right
away. I even got reports of distortion during transmit. I am using
Windows 7 and loaded Windows XP and didn't have a problem. I had an
extra PC
Hi John,
I agree, the F3K is a semi-break-in rig not a full QSK rig, but it
does have a lot of good features.
One thing I have learnt over the many years of being a HAM is that
there is no such thing as the perfect rig :)
I very rarely use SSB so I like you have no interest whatsoever in
Bob, congratulations on your ability to send high speed CW and to place high in
contests. I respect you for these accomplishments and especially respect you
for your contributions to the Flex radio operations.
I had noticed that Flex has removed most references about ability to QSK in
their
Jay,
There are significant CW performance and other improvements coming in
PowerSDR 2.0 (a.k.a. PB-PAL). These enhancements are already being alpha
tested by our FlexEdge reflector group. Reports are very favorable.
What Bob means is that to make improvements beyond what we have done in
PB-PAL
Is there any adjustment to have the monitor output adjusted so you dont have a
delay? Im using a 3000, love but dont like the monitor delay makes me sound
drunk on my audio LOL
Tnx Todd
N4QWZ
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
Aha!
Thanks, Gerald. It is clear now.
Don't read my comments wrong. Because I'm not a software writer anywhere near
the level of the excellent contributors who have been improving this radio, I'm
not always tuned into exactly what is going on in terms of the software
development and
Todd,
The delay is due to the inherent latency in the audio processing. I am
certain that Tim will refer you to a Knowledge Center article that covers
this. (I am just too lazy to look it up right nowhi..hi.)
The bottom line is that you can affect the delay by playing with the size of
the
http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50437.aspx
Smaller buffers, faster sampling rates and a fast PC = low latency.
The trade offs, as Ray explained are covered in great detail in the KB article
listed above.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
To all Flexers,
Due to a logistics and a scheduling conflict, FlexRadio Systems is not
going to be in attendance at the Charlotte hamfest in March. We didn't
want to leave North Carolina high and dry, so there will be a FlexRadio
booth at the Raleigh (RARS) hamfest on April 3, 2010.
The FlexPedition with the F3K to the island of Bequia as J8K2CM was a lot of
fun, and I have returned home. Will send out QSL cards when I get them back
from the printers.
The F3K worked flawlessly; however, I had problems with RF getting into the
laptop computer. I finally cured the
That is interesting. I will check the irq's.
The other computer was a much slower XP Pro box.
Mike VA3MW
Ron Wenig wrote:
Hi Mike,
You probably saw my email about distorted audio on my Flex 3000. It
would clear up after stopping and starting but would distort right
away. I even got
With a fast computer, you can run the radio in normal mode with low audio
buffers, and also turn the TX dsp buffer all the way down, and get a real
time monitor.
Lowering the sample rate to 96 KHz helps run with smaller buffers on the
flex 5000, so I suspect the 3000 will run with lower buffers
Tim
Any update from Eugene regarding VAC 4.10 issues ?
Dave W0DHB
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives:
I noticed a post the other day from Dale that the SVN was back and alive
with a new IP address of 64.245.179.219. After following the directions for
the new insertion of the IP Address SVN is requesting a user name and
password.
Anyone have an idea where I might obtain a new user name and
Hello Charles,
Please paste in the exact svn url you are attempting to access,
beginning with svn:// to the end of your path.
Thanks,
Dale
WA8SRA
Charles Davis wrote:
I noticed a post the other day from Dale that the SVN was back and alive
with a new IP address of 64.245.179.219.
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling features in 4.10 that
makes its use mandatory. Certainly 4.09 works just fine with PSDR when
communicating with
At 09:04 PM 2/23/2010, Brian Lloyd wrote:
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling features in 4.10 that
makes its use mandatory. Certainly 4.09 works
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:11 PM, k5nwa k5...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
At 09:04 PM 2/23/2010, Brian Lloyd wrote:
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling
19 matches
Mail list logo
