BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Hello,
I have a question some one might know the answer to, first up I have
to thank the people getting me to use vspMgr, its great works under
win 7 with out any great problems.
I how ever do have a question and you will ask why,
Get DDutil. It will do what you want
Stan K9IUQ
Paul Mullins wrote:
The problem is that virtual ports are normally single ended? meaning
com 6 - 16 , in on flex end say 16 and the software is on com 6 just
as an example, is there a way of having a secondary (third) logging
software running
Mike,
Did you run the frequency calibration in the Setup->General->Calibration
The frequency calibration information is kept only in the database, so if you
reset your database, you should re-run the frequency calibration. It only
takes a few seconds to run and uses WWV as the frequency refere
John,
You are obviously more knowledgeable than I on the subject, and have received
some nuanced replies. My suggestion is more akin to using a hammer: that is, a
22 inch widescreen display at its max resolution of 1620. I find that this
assists me in visually deciphering the low res digi di
Pwr meter does not work. I understand it is probably a diode. Is the diode on
theHRFIO board? If not, which board is it on and is field fixble?
Thanks,
Art, K8JK
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio
Dave,
Thanks. That is a job for flex service!
Art
From: Dave Beumer WØDHB
To: w8...@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, February 27, 2010 12:24:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] 5K Pwr Meter
Art
It's typically D3 and D4 on the PA board.. They are very tiny surface mount
diod
Thanks for the tip. I unplugged and replugged the fan and it is now working.
Art
From: Tim Ellison
To: "w8...@yahoo.com" ; "flexradio@flex-radio.biz"
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 2:07:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] 5K Fan operation
Maybe. It is fairly qui
Hi guys
Back to normal mode now, the question of which OS is a personal choice. Many
people like what they are used to, some like the latest and greatest. I like
what works best for my particular application, primarily because I have so
many computers around here that I can almost have a separate
As Microsoft wants to sell Win7, they are quickly raising the price of XP so
that its not economically feasible to buy it (which I would do if I were
Microsoft also). In the last 2 months, they have raised the price of a valid
OEM copy from $129 to $169. I do not think this will stop either, it see
Neal,
Thanks for the comments, found them interesting...
73, Fred
WA8KCW
Neal Campbell wrote:
As Microsoft wants to sell Win7, they are quickly raising the price of XP so
that its not economically feasible to buy it (which I would do if I were
Microsoft also). In the last 2 months,
At 02:17 PM 2/27/2010 -0500, you wrote:
As Microsoft wants to sell Win7, they are quickly raising the price of XP so
that its not economically feasible to buy it (which I would do if I were
Microsoft also).
Do you mean to "act unethically ??" heaven forbid Microsoft wouldn't act
unethically .
Neal and everyone
I agree with most of what Neal says. The only thing I would disagree
with is WIN XP.
If I already had a computer with Win Xp (which I do-my 5 yr old laptop)
I would use it.
Where I differ with Neal is I would not buy one of his computers with
WIN XP. I would buy his comput
Neal
We continue to agree.
IE in any version is horrible in my opinion. I have tried my best to
stay away from Mircrosoft IE
As a long time Netscape- Mozilla fan and later Firefox I know the
advantages of a better browser.
I have been using Google Chrome the last couple months and I like it
Well, they are in business to make a profit so they have to somehow! I
actually think the Evil Empire is much less evil these days and I am a
Microsoft Partner (I could never afford to install so many different
machines with all these operating systems if I wasn't!). For all the good
Bill and Melin
What you probably don't know is that when you run a "regular" (i.e., 32 bit)
program on a 64 bit system, it runs in an emulator called WoW64 (
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa384249%28VS.85%29.aspx ) so you are
adding one more layer of overhead, kinda like running in a virtual machine
As an early adopter of computer technology, I was running my own PC
With ham radio apps before IBM and Microsoft even got into the business.
You REALLY don't want to go back to the days when each hardware
manufacturer had his own little weird OS and apps had to be written
differently for eac
Being that this thread is about Win7. I'm wondering if anyone running
a SDR-1000 is doing so on Win7 using either the new FA66 32-bit or the
64-bit version of the FA66 drivers?
Neal Campbell wrote:
Hi guys
Back to normal mode now, the question of which OS is a personal choice. Many
people l
Peter
The first sentence in the Microsoft link I copied is "WOW64 is the x86
emulator that allows 32-bit Windows-based applications to run seamlessly on
64-bit Windows. "
What am I missing?
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
(540) 645 5394 NEW PHONE NUMBER
Amateur R
That sometimes words don't mean a thing. Don't trust anything anyone
says, they are a figment of your imagination.
At 03:11 PM 2/27/2010, Neal Campbell wrote:
Peter
The first sentence in the Microsoft link I copied is "WOW64 is the x86
emulator that allows 32-bit Windows-based applications to
The first sentence in the Microsoft link I copied is "WOW64 is the x86 emulator
that allows 32-bit Windows-based applications to run seamlessly on 64-bit
Windows. "
What am I missing?
The technical details about 64-bit Windows on the x64, maybe? Remember, those
articles are written by tech
20 matches
Mail list logo
