- Original Message -
From: Jerry Flanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lee Mushel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexRadio FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness oftypical
amateurtransceiver audio without EQ
At 06:02 PM 6/3/2008, Lee Mushel
And the Phoenix communication system is working very well indeed! Great job
JPL!
73 Ross K9COX
Jim, W6RMK
(who designs those deep space radios for a living)
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
: Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexRadio FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness oftypical
amateurtransceiver audio without EQ
Quoting Mike Naruta [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue 03 Jun 2008 06:12:51 AM
PDT
At 06:02 PM 6/3/2008, Lee Mushel wrote:
snip What on earth is the point of
worrying about whether or not there is space between dits at 60 wpm?
Not necessarily at 60 WPM - I would be happy with 35. Wouldn't you
prefer to hear your channel in full duplex? Think about it - how
would you like a
Hello Jerry,
You stated:
Sounds
like you have never actually used it or you would probably not have
made that comment.
I've operated primarily cw for 42 years, and have tried close-enough
QSK with my K2. However, I really dislike hearing band noise between
letters -- forget about between
Flanders
Cc: FlexRadio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness oftypical
amateurtransceiver audio without EQ
Hello Jerry,
You stated:
Sounds
like you have never actually used it or you would probably not have made
that comment.
I've operated primarily cw for 42 years, and have tried
6 matches
Mail list logo
