Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Flex radios are the worst polluters ??
Perhaps the "pollution" situation is more of an ethical issue than a legal one.
An analogy might help to understand. As far as I remember, the FCC and
other authorities place no legal constraints on audio qua
Gedas,
This is an interesting situation for me, and indeed I had never considered the
possible unwanted emissions from a Flex or any other SDR. This is this
interesting because I'm hoping to use a nice 90ft dish in the future and with
the gain this beasty has I could make a right royal nuisance
Perhaps the "pollution" situation is more of an ethical issue than a legal
one.
An analogy might help to understand. As far as I remember, the FCC and
other authorities place no legal constraints on audio quality.A
transmitter with badly distorted audio and a loud 120 Hz hum is painful for
ot
ds on both the digital (AFSK) and SSB.
John
-Original Message-
From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Ian
Scoble
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:55 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Flex radios are the worst polluters ??
I don’t us
Yes, I first discovered this issue as i red SM5BSZs article. But I do care
about my fellow radio amateurs in the neighborhood or across the North Sea.
My 1,5 m dish for 23/13 cm has it 3 dB points between ~150 km over the
London area. By lifted conditions that are very common during spring and
sum
At 13:20 4/22/2014, John Kramer wrote:
I read a disturbing post on the TS-2000
reflector claiming that the legacy Flex radios pollute the
bands with noise
.it claimed that the Flex-5000,
3000 and 1500 are by far the worst of any modern
radio.
The poster also said that under no circumstances
It is obvious that those who condemn this statement have no idea what he is
talking about or understand any weak signal work . Perhaps people should
educate themselves about the said topic .
Sam Strongin kf4yox
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Steven Hess wrote:
>
> I
W8BYA
Gallery at http://w8bya.com
Light travels faster than sound
This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Hess"
To: "FlexRadio reflector"
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio]
I don’t usually want to get involved in this type of argument but I have
to say for the few contacts that are made on the microwave bands in
comparison to what are usually made on HF
I really don’t see this as an issue also by the fact that you are using
dishes with very small beam widths again it’
In Vermont, these people are called "'giners," Agin this, agin that. Or,
as my grandmother would have said, "Never wanting what you've got. Always
wanting what it's not."
They are always with us.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Steven Hess wrote:
> I'd like to know what is arrogant about
I'd like to know what is arrogant about making a radio that surpasses all
legitimate legal requirements by quite a bit?
Most places have a noise floor so high you'll never notice this at all.
Some people just live to complain and tear things down.
I put that in this category.
Lets just drop it.
My toyota Prius is a wonderful piece of technology but I don't expect it to
excel at all things. Saves gas but will never win anything.
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 5:42 AM, Kjeld Bülow Thomsen wrote:
>
> The article about broadband noise from the Flex radios was published in the
> DUBUS Magazine 3
The article about broadband noise from the Flex radios was published in the
DUBUS Magazine 3 -2013. I was a long time waiting for a official response
from Flexradio. As nothing happened I contacted Flexradio and got the same
information from Tim Ellison: Yes, we agree upon SM5BSZs measurement but
radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Flex radios are the worst polluters ??
>
> Greg
>
> Thank you very much for your response, it does somewhat put my mind at ease.
> I was
> not aware that this complaint has been circulating for some time now - it is
> the first I
>
: Re: [Flexradio] Flex radios are the worst polluters ??
>
> Greg
>
> Thank you very much for your response, it does somewhat put my mind at ease.
> I was
> not aware that this complaint has been circulating for some time now - it is
> the first I
> have heard of it.
&g
Greg
Thank you very much for your response, it does somewhat put my mind at ease. I
was
not aware that this complaint has been circulating for some time now - it is
the first I
have heard of it.
Being a responsible ham, I always strive to transmit the cleanest signal that I
possibly can….and
Looks all the world to me like somebody with an agenda and an axe to
grind. I don't know for sure but the tone of the writing sure reminds
me of a poster over on e-ham who has been screaming about transmitter
IMD performance for years. He never talks about anything else and most
of us have ju
I read a disturbing post on the TS-2000 reflector claiming that the legacy Flex
radio’s pollute the
bands with noise….it claimed that the Flex-5000, 3000 and 1500 are by far the
worst of any modern
radio.
The poster also said that under no circumstances should a Flex be used with an
amplifier
18 matches
Mail list logo
