On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Frank Brickle wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Brian Lloyd
> wrote:
> > ...
> > But most of the OS's today are things that provide a relatively disjoint
> > environment in which independent applications run...I certainly see the
> attraction. It
> > is
Am 12.10.2010 um 07:35 schrieb Frank Brickle:
> The perennial problem, isn't it? Whether to design to the needs of the
> expert or the naive user. Here, as in so many other areas these days,
> the solution seems ready to hand: multiple, simultaneous virtualized
> environments on a single user syst
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> ...
> But most of the OS's today are things that provide a relatively disjoint
> environment in which independent applications run...I certainly see the
> attraction. It
> is very powerful for the wizard willing to learn to use it. But it pro
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:00 PM, David McClain wrote:
> yes, one of my points in my note, but not made clearly, was that with an
> integration time of only 5 seconds, by rights, you could lay claim to 200
> mHz precision, or thereabouts. So you did very well, considering.
>
Yes, especially knowi
yes, one of my points in my note, but not made clearly, was that with
an integration time of only 5 seconds, by rights, you could lay claim
to 200 mHz precision, or thereabouts. So you did very well, considering.
Don't know what TANSTAAFL means?
having it all there where you can come up with
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, David McClain <
d...@refined-audiometrics.com> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I found the Fldigi system interesting... and at first you had me thinking
> someone had found a way around the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, in
> terms of making rapid measurements of fine freq
Okay Frank! Wow, I didn't expect that response!
I mostly use LispWorks 6 at this time, but I also have Allegro 8.1
here, and try to keep my code mostly portable between them. The
latest LW has some really awesome SMP capabilities. But I am a firm
believer in Lisp for this kind of thing, and
Am 11.10.2010 um 21:55 schrieb David McClain:
> (Oh, how I dream of just doing it all myself in Lisp, with Lisp fully present
> all the time... that way you can make up ad-hoc measurements that would never
> have been thought of until you need them. Closed systems can't possibly
> anticipate ev
Brian,
I found the Fldigi system interesting... and at first you had me
thinking someone had found a way around the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle, in terms of making rapid measurements of fine frequency
differences...
So I did some research on Fldigi, tried it out, and looked up AFC
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
> An additional source of error is the fact that the 5000 does not tune
> continuously. It tunes in steps, and they are irregular, so an additional
> correction is required. When you are watching your WWV phase display, a part
> of the error yo
net>
>Cc: <mailto:flexradio@flex-radio.biz>flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] My Rookie Performance in the Recent FMT
>
>I did, and got within 27 mHz for one of the runs with my GPSDO'ed
>5000a. Better than 0.1 Hz on three of the four.
>
>Brian, W
PM 10/9/2010, Richard W. Solomon wrote:
>>
>>> Where can I find some literature on measurement equipment and techniques
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Dick, W1KSZ
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> >From: Jerry Flanders
&g
From: Jerry Flanders
>> >Sent: Oct 9, 2010 4:00 PM
>> >To: Jeff Singer
>> >Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>> >Subject: Re: [Flexradio] My Rookie Performance in the Recent FMT
>> >
>> >I did, and got within 27 mHz for one of the runs with my GPSDO
4:00 PM
>To: Jeff Singer
>Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] My Rookie Performance in the Recent FMT
>
>I did, and got within 27 mHz for one of the runs with my GPSDO'ed
>5000a. Better than 0.1 Hz on three of the four.
>
>Brian, WB6RQN, got within
An additional source of error is the fact that the 5000 does not tune
continuously. It tunes in steps, and they are irregular, so an
additional correction is required. When you are watching your WWV
phase display, a part of the error you see may be due to this. This
may not be important unless
Hi Jeff,
For about $150 you can get a used Trimble Thunderbolt
GPSDO that will give you a precision 10 MHz reference
signal to put into your Flex Radio. Tune in WWV
and watch the Phase display. The rotation is from
Doppler.
After parking the rig at a convenient frequency a
couple of hundred H
Where can I find some literature on measurement equipment and techniques ?
Thanks, Dick, W1KSZ
-Original Message-
>From: Jerry Flanders
>Sent: Oct 9, 2010 4:00 PM
>To: Jeff Singer
>Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] My Rookie Performance in the Rece
I did, and got within 27 mHz for one of the runs with my GPSDO'ed
5000a. Better than 0.1 Hz on three of the four.
Brian, WB6RQN, got within 5 mHz on one!!! I got within 10 mHz on a
test awhile back.
One problem with the 5000a is that the tuning step size is pretty big.
Sound card programs li
Thanks for the alert on the K5CM Frequency Measuring Test a few nights ago.
That test uses two stations to send a CW carrier on 160, 80 (twice) and 40
meters. A FMT is something totally new to me. My only preparation was to
calibrate the radio carefully against WWV using its built-in scope. My
re
19 matches
Mail list logo
