Could I suggest that any comments on this subject are also published here as
well -
I've read Guy's review and found it extremely interesting, as I'm sure others
will.
When I first started using the SDR, back end 2004, I found the receive
performance
on 160 wide open to BCI. The cure was a Ki
mments in my blog, particularly his comments such as the SDR-1000
having "an estimated 8500 spurs greater than -110 dB over its entire range."
Whaaat??
73,
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Smithers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:36 AM
To: flexrad
hnical Services ( http://www.itsco.com )
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Atkins
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:44 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Blog on Trans-Pacific MW and Tropical Band
Hi Trevor,
Hello Guy,
>I'd hesitate to duplicate any comments or additions to my blog on the
>Flex-Radio reflector, as I'm sure my interests are in the minority. However,
>it's easy enough to check the blog occasionally.
A bit of mis-communication on my part I'm afraid. My comment about keeping
discussions
Members of the Flex-Radio reflector may be
interested in following the weblog of my experiences, pro & con, with
the SDR-1000. I intend to add to this blog as time allows (hopefully weekly) as
I discover how my receive-only version performs for trans-Pacific mediumwave
DXing and the tropical
> Members of the Flex-Radio reflector may be interested in following the
weblog of my experiences, pro & con, with the SDR-1000. I intend to add
to
> this blog as time allows (hopefully weekly) as I discover how my
receive-only version performs for trans-Pacific mediumwave DXing and the
tropical ba
6 matches
Mail list logo
