Re: [Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-3000 production units

2009-02-21 Thread Lee Mushel
! Bring 'em on! Lee K9WRU - Original Message - From: "Lux, James P" To: "Duane - N9DG" ; "W7CE" ; Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-3000 production un

Re: [Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-3000 production units

2009-02-20 Thread Lux, James P
> -Original Message- > From: Duane - N9DG [mailto:n...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:38 PM > To: W7CE; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz; Lux, James P > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and > otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-300

Re: [Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-3000 production units

2009-02-20 Thread Duane - N9DG
--- On Fri, 2/20/09, Lux, James P wrote: > Or, you start treating radios like PCs. Expect to replace > it every 5 years or so. Even if you fork out $4800 for a > Flex5C every 5 years, that's about $1K/yr. FWIW I don't think it will come to that. What I envision happening is that the writing

[Flexradio] On interfaces, historical and otherwise.. RE: First look at the FLEX-3000 production units

2009-02-20 Thread Lux, James P
> -Original Message- > > > Based on all the problems that seem to be associated with > Flex Radios and FireWire, whether the problem is Windows, > drivers, or whatever, it seems to me that Ethernet is a much > better choice. I would not be surprised if > FireWire is a forgotten stan