Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-03 Thread Eric Ellison
biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers I just can't resist... "Nothing is too good for the taxpayer and that's usually what he gets." Bob, K5KDN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 02

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-02 Thread Bob Tracy
ROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers Well,.. we found out one thing: That is: all the brightest computer sutdents at college that that now write programs for Flex radio, played hookie from Chemistry Class!! Most heavey metals at that e

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-02 Thread k6kdk
Well,.. we found out one thing: That is: all the brightest computer sutdents at college that that now write programs for Flex radio, played hookie from Chemistry Class!! Most heavey metals at that end of the Periodic table are in fact VERY posionious, with the exception of Gold. But you come in co

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-02 Thread Bill Guyger
years anyhow. My response is I really wouldn't like to replace a > $3000 piece > > of consumer electronics equipment in 2 years or less. > > > > I have discussed this with manufacturers also. They are concerned with the > > shelve life of products, as tin whiske

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-01 Thread Ahti Aintila
From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 1:40 PM To: William Bordy; 'Lyle Johnson' Cc: 'FlexRadio' Subject: RE: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers was Re: July 1 At 09:28 AM 5/1/2006, William Bordy wrote: >I have been following the RoHS requirements

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-01 Thread Jim Lux
At 02:59 PM 5/1/2006, William Bordy wrote: >>Problems with tin whiskers have been around a lot longer than RoHS >>(perhaps >>as far back as WW II?). It presents a problem with reliability of >>equipment >>designed for low cost production, with no budget for re-engineering, sure. >>But for the re

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers

2006-05-01 Thread William Bordy
der the rug in the rush to no-lead solutions. 73, Bill Bordy NJ1H -Original Message- From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 1:40 PM To: William Bordy; 'Lyle Johnson' Cc: 'FlexRadio' Subject: RE: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers was R

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers was Re: July 1

2006-05-01 Thread Ahti Aintila
Bill, You are right, at least partially. There is a big risk of tin whiskers shorting the narrow gaps between the fine pitch lead-free solder joints, unless the manufacturers know exactly their materials and can strictly control the process. There are positive examples since several years when s

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers was Re: July 1

2006-05-01 Thread Jim Lux
At 09:28 AM 5/1/2006, William Bordy wrote: I have been following the RoHS requirements and one issue I see rarely discussed is the "Tin Whiskers" issue. For those that are not familiar with it please see the following WEB site: http://nepp.nasa.gov/WHISKER/background/index.htm It appears that w

Re: [Flexradio] RoHS & Tin Whiskers was Re: July 1

2006-05-01 Thread William Bordy
I have been following the RoHS requirements and one issue I see rarely discussed is the "Tin Whiskers" issue. For those that are not familiar with it please see the following WEB site: http://nepp.nasa.gov/WHISKER/background/index.htm It appears that with the switch to no-lead that the reliabilit