I've recently bought a Flex-1500, initially to give SDR QSO-ing a try
and now I'm hooked. Almost all my QSOs are digital, so I realise I'll
need VAC.
I've tried 4.09 and it works reasonably well, except for some latency
issues (audio card or PowerSDR settings?). The audio outputs to MixW
appe
Tim/Mike
What OS are you running with VAC 4.10 and how many CPU's ?
One of the "improvements" in 4.10 was to spread the VAC computations over
multi-cores .
I've downloaded my upgrade, but holding off awaiting word from Tim .
Dave W0DHB
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-ra
Tim
Any update from Eugene regarding VAC 4.10 issues ?
Dave W0DHB
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40
See my comments below
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Bob Towers
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:53 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
I've recently bought a Flex
dio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Bob Towers
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:53 AM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
>
> I've recently bought a Flex-1500, initially to give SDR QSO-ing a try and now
> I'm hooked. Almost all my QSOs
im Ellison" wrote:
>
> > See my comments below
> >
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
> > [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Bob Towers
> > Sent:
Yes
Dave W0DHB
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Michael Walker
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:29 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Does he have a 64 Bit signed version of
...@flex-radio.biz
> [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Michael Walker
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:29 AM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
>
> Does he have a 64 Bit signed version of 4.09? The copy I have is not
> signed.
>
Hi Dave,
I'm using Windows XP on a Quad Core AMD Phenom II x4 965 AM3 Black
Edition CPU running at 3.4Ghz with 4GB RAM.
The system load is never above 5% with everything running, PSDR, VAC,
DDUtil, Fldigi, VOAcap and Band Master.
The audio from VAC is quite poor to say the least, I have bee
Mike,
Alternatively, contact the author & see if he won't let you downgrade to VAC
4.9, which works fine.
73, Ray, K9DUR
http://k9dur.info
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexra
7;ve gone VAC you'll never go back :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tatum [mailto:m...@f5vkm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 4:15 PM
To: Ray - K9DUR
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi Ray,
I've downloaded 409 full version and have installed i
radio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Mike
I believe you may be able to tweak some buffer sizes to reduce the latency.
The only metric I have is that there has never been any problem in quick
turn Digital qso's in Various contests when I've used Fldigi and DM78
---
From: Mike Tatum [mailto:m...@f5vkm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 4:15 PM
To: Ray - K9DUR
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi Ray,
I've downloaded 409 full version and have installed it.
The audio is better and the delay getting the sound to fldigi is
not so
, 2010 7:32 PM
To: 'Mike Tatum'; 'Ray - K9DUR'
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Mike
I believe you may be able to tweak some buffer sizes to reduce the
latency.
The only metric I have is that there has never been any problem in
quick
turn Digit
How do you have CAT configured with FLDIGI? RigCat?
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tatum [mailto:m...@f5vkm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 9:20 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB; 'Ray - K9DUR'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi
PM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB; 'Ray - K9DUR'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi Tim,
CAT works fine, it's instant, tune the F3K and fldigi and BandMaster
keep track of the frequency instantly, the delay seems to be
with the sound getting in
---Original Message-
From: Mike Tatum [mailto:m...@f5vkm.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:45 AM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB; 'Ray - K9DUR'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi Tim,
Yes I am using RigCAT and the PowerSDR.xml file.
Works perfec
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tatum [mailto:m...@f5vkm.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:45 AM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: Dave Beumer W0DHB; 'Ray - K9DUR'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Hi Tim,
Yes I am using RigCAT and the PowerSDR.xml file.
Works perfectly
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling features in 4.10 that
makes its use mandatory. Certainly 4.09 works just fine with PSDR when
communicating with bac
At 09:04 PM 2/23/2010, Brian Lloyd wrote:
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling features in 4.10 that
makes its use mandatory. Certainly 4.09 works jus
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:11 PM, k5nwa wrote:
> At 09:04 PM 2/23/2010, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
>> Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
>> haven't heard anything about special enabling features in
: Wednesday, 24 February 2010 3:33 PM
To: k5nwa
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:11 PM, k5nwa wrote:
> At 09:04 PM 2/23/2010, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
>&g
On 02/23/10 10:04 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
haven't heard anything about special enabling features in 4.10 that
makes its use mandatory. Certainly 4.09 works jus
NV8A
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:52 AM
To: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
On 02/23/10 10:04 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> I guess I don't understand the concern about VAC 4.09 vs. VAC 4.10.
> Yes, there is a problem with 4.10 and its interaction with PSDR but I
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Alan NV8A wrote:
> But if somebody buys VAC now, will they get a choice of 4.09 or 4.10, or
> will 4.10 be the only version available -- at least without jumping through
> hoops?
Yeah, I get it now. It was one of those moments where my
usually-functional brain was
ge: 19
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:51:45 -0500
From: Alan NV8A
To: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] VAC 4.10
Message-ID: <4b852ef1.6080...@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 02/23/10 10:04 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
I guess I don'
26 matches
Mail list logo
