On Saturday 01 December 2001 2:20 am, you wrote:
> Did a fresh build of fgfs from the CVS library @ 10pm PST. Everthing went
> fine.
>
> Downloaded the snapshot of the base package and installed
Theres a fresh snap up really you should do a CVS checkout
>
> fgfs_base-snap.0.7.9.t
Did a fresh build of fgfs from the CVS library @ 10pm PST. Everthing went
fine.
Downloaded the snapshot of the base package and installed
fgfs_base-snap.0.7.9.tar.gz
26.9M Friday, 30-Nov-2001 02:00:58 EST
Got a config mismatch area from jsbsim for the configuration file:
Someone with an SGI already needs to build an executable for starters.
Would be fun to arm wrestle to see who gets the new sgi. It wouldn't
hurt our project to win an award now and then. I could burn a cd with
the irix binary and contribute to the written description.
Regards,
Curt.
Erik Hofm
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Andy, just gave this a quick try and my first comment is that the
> ailerons appear to be rigged backwards. Haven't really made it very
> far in the air yet. :-)
Gr I thought I'd been so careful to make sure I worked with the
defaults. Ugh, sorry. My joystick dr
Andy,
I have added you initial revision to the flightgear tree and have
committed it to CVS. We should probably 'negotiate' where the
aircraft xml files should live in the base package.
Wow, this has been a busy week: a whole new FDM to play with, zillions
of changes to JSBSim, a new twin aircr
On Friday 30 November 2001 11:24 pm, you wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.11.30 19:14]:
> > On Friday 30 November 2001 5:49 pm, you wrote:
> > > Are you going to base the panel on photos of the real thing?
> > > David
> >
> > Yes, but there are a lot of configurations. I'm going with a 310R
> >
On Friday 30 November 2001 11:01 pm, you wrote:
> John,
> Can you setup the fgfs-base CVS server to send commit messages to the
> flightgear-cvslogs list? It would be helpful to know when stuff is
> updated. Thanks
Can't argue with that. I usually send a message manually, but I'm not the
only
Andy, just gave this a quick try and my first comment is that the
ailerons appear to be rigged backwards. Haven't really made it very
far in the air yet. :-)
Curt.
Andy Ross writes:
> OK, as promised, I've put together a first release of my "YASim" (sue
> me, I couldn't think of a better name)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.11.30 19:14]:
> On Friday 30 November 2001 5:49 pm, you wrote:
> > Are you going to base the panel on photos of the real thing?
> > David
>
> Yes, but there are a lot of configurations. I'm going with a 310R
> since that was the last piston engine variety. I found some n
John Check writes:
> Try syncing your base package again, also make sure to set the mixture for
> engine 2. When I committed the latest JSBSim stuff I inadvertently committed
> a panel in progress. I've since rolled it back.
As far as I can tell I have the latest of everything, right mixture
pus
On Friday 30 November 2001 10:30 pm, you wrote:
> David,
>
> With the latest JSBSim, latest c310.xml, and latest panel stuff from
> John, I'm only able to start the left engine. The right engine will
> crank, but it won't catch. Any ideas what I should look at? It was
> working earlier today, b
John,
Can you setup the fgfs-base CVS server to send commit messages to the
flightgear-cvslogs list? It would be helpful to know when stuff is
updated. Thanks
--
Cameron Moore
[ Why are there interstate highways in Hawaii? ]
___
Flightgear-devel mail
David,
With the latest JSBSim, latest c310.xml, and latest panel stuff from
John, I'm only able to start the left engine. The right engine will
crank, but it won't catch. Any ideas what I should look at? It was
working earlier today, but I'm having trouble now after the latest
updates.
Thanks
All: JSBSim should be fully synced as of 9pm Central USA time zone.
Curt.
BERNDT, JON S. (JON) (JSC-EX) (LM) writes:
> The current version of JSBSim in JSBSim CVS is now completely syncronized
> with several bugs squashed. The intense efforts of the FlightGear and the
> "extended" JSBSim team h
> > FYI the engIO470D.xml does not exist in JSBsim CVS
>
> Yes it does. Well, as of three minutes ago, anyhow!
>
> > There are also:
> > eng_io320.xml
> > c172.xml
>
> c172.xml isn't actually in CVS, though it may have been distributed in
that
> directory somehow. the other engine is not
John,
A fix was commited to CVS much earlier today. Make sure your cvs tree
is up to date and it all should work.
Curt.
John Wojnaroski writes:
> Has anyone seen this? Not sure this warrants a bug report or where to report
> it,
>
> Doing a new build with the the C310 code and latest CVS (We
> FYI the engIO470D.xml does not exist in JSBsim CVS
Yes it does. Well, as of three minutes ago, anyhow!
> There are also:
> eng_io320.xml
> c172.xml
c172.xml isn't actually in CVS, though it may have been distributed in that
directory somehow. the other engine is not bogus but probably u
On Friday 30 November 2001 8:22 pm, you wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2001 7:47 pm, you wrote:
> > The current version of JSBSim in JSBSim CVS is now completely syncronized
> > with several bugs squashed. The intense efforts of the FlightGear and the
> > "extended" JSBSim team have given us a new
On Friday 30 November 2001 7:47 pm, you wrote:
> The current version of JSBSim in JSBSim CVS is now completely syncronized
> with several bugs squashed. The intense efforts of the FlightGear and the
> "extended" JSBSim team have given us a new vehicle to fly, the Cessna 310.
> As David Megginson m
On Friday 30 November 2001 5:49 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:42, you wrote:
> > John Check writes:
> > > First item on my list is correct style throttle, pitch and mixture
> > > controls. Where can I get engine specs so I can redo the gauge
> > > faces?
> >
> > Are they readable on a
The current version of JSBSim in JSBSim CVS is now completely syncronized
with several bugs squashed. The intense efforts of the FlightGear and the
"extended" JSBSim team have given us a new vehicle to fly, the Cessna 310.
As David Megginson mentioned in his release announcement, there are still a
> then I should replace the FGState.cpp code from the C310 package??
>
> JW
If I were you I'd grab it all from JSBSim CVS now. It's all in sync and
works - it is *very* fresh.
This new version requires the latest config files.
Jon
___
Flightgear-dev
> Okay, I think I found it.
>
> In FGPosition 1.31 2001/11/30 16:49there is a GetHOverBCG() and
> GetHOverBMAC()
>
> In FGState.cpp from the C310 package the function
> FGState::GetParameter(...)
> defines
>
> case FG_HOVERB:
> return Position->GetHOverB():
>
> Should one or both
- enough? any ideas?
>
> No, it is not late enough. I made a fix to JSBSim.cxx (now in JSBSim CVS)
> that you need. This file has apparently not been committed to FGFS CVS,
yet.
> Get all the files from JSBSim CVS and put those in your flightgear tree.
Put
> the aircraft and engine files into
Okay, I think I found it.
In FGPosition 1.31 2001/11/30 16:49there is a GetHOverBCG() and
GetHOverBMAC()
In FGState.cpp from the C310 package the function FGState::GetParameter(...)
defines
case FG_HOVERB:
return Position->GetHOverB():
Should one or both of these be added to the c
> Doing a new build with the the C310 code and latest CVS
> (Wednesday- noon)
>
> during compile FGReportState complains about a missing
> FGAerodynamics::GetNlf();
> At runtime everything normal until error msg:
>
> "FGState::GetParameter() - No handler for parameter height/span"
>
> Is
Has anyone seen this? Not sure this warrants a bug report or where to report
it,
Doing a new build with the the C310 code and latest CVS (Wednesday- noon)
during compile FGReportState complains about a missing
FGAerodynamics::GetNlf();
Yep, nothing in .[ch}xx (at least not in my copy) Created a
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:42, you wrote:
> John Check writes:
> > First item on my list is correct style throttle, pitch and mixture
> > controls. Where can I get engine specs so I can redo the gauge
> > faces?
>
> Are they readable on any of the pics I sent you? If not, try to find
> a screensho
On Friday 30 November 2001 5:36 pm, you wrote:
> Would this be of help?:
>
> http://www.lycoming.textron.com/products/engines/540.html
>
> I provide this link because I suspect the IO540 is the engine we want(?)
>
> Jon
>
Doesn't hurt. Thanks.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Check
On Friday 30 November 2001 5:42 pm, you wrote:
> John Check writes:
> > First item on my list is correct style throttle, pitch and mixture
> > controls. Where can I get engine specs so I can redo the gauge
> > faces?
>
> Are they readable on any of the pics I sent you? If not, try to find
> a
John Check writes:
> First item on my list is correct style throttle, pitch and mixture
> controls. Where can I get engine specs so I can redo the gauge
> faces?
Are they readable on any of the pics I sent you? If not, try to find
a screenshot from a good MSFS panel (I think there were a co
Would this be of help?:
http://www.lycoming.textron.com/products/engines/540.html
I provide this link because I suspect the IO540 is the engine we want(?)
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: John Check [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROT
First item on my list is correct style throttle, pitch and mixture controls.
Where can I get engine specs so I can redo the gauge faces?
TTYL
J
On Friday 30 November 2001 3:42 pm, you wrote:
> David, John,
>
> Good work on the initial panel and model. Minor nit (before even
> trying to take off
> - Single-engine flight doesn't cause any yaw (I suspect a JSBSim bug
> here).
What!? no yaw?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Good work on the initial panel and model. Minor nit (before even
> trying to take off) The engine will not even crank if the mixture is
> pulled all the way out. Push in the mixture and the engine cranks
> (and starts) just fine.
The piston engine model currently
David, John,
Good work on the initial panel and model. Minor nit (before even
trying to take off) The engine will not even crank if the mixture is
pulled all the way out. Push in the mixture and the engine cranks
(and starts) just fine.
Thanks,
Curt.
David Megginson writes:
> For those of y
For those of you who haven't been following the discussion on
flightgear-model, we have a new JSBSim aero model available in CVS.
The Cessna 310 is a low-wing six-seater, twin-prop piston-powered
aircraft with funny fuel tanks on the wingtips. It has a range of
800-1000nm (depending on configurat
One of the biggest shortcomings of the YASim stuff I posted yesterday
was the lack of documentation for the XML aircraft configuration
files. So I wrote some; it's attached. This is terse (it only
describes the tags available, and doesn't make a very good how-to
guide), but should be useful to a
Just a slight note of clarification.
John Wojnaroski wrote:
>(Primary flight display and engine displays) running. FG and panel source is
>at ftp://ftp.kingmont.com with some install and build instructions.
Those files are actually located down in the sub directory at:
ftp://ftp.kingmo
Perhaps you mean '=' instead of '=='?
void SetEngineNumber(int nn) {EngineNumber = nn;}
Regards.
Mark K Vallevand
Fat, dumb and happy. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:08 AM
> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > "../FGEngine.h", line 186: warning(1171): expression has no effect
> > void SetEngineNumber(int nn) {EngineNumber == nn;}
>
> Yes, I have just noticed that but cannot figure out what the hell that's all
> about. Am I missing something obvious?
"==" inste
> It looks to me like it evaluates EngineNumber == nn, but does nothing
> with the result, hence 'Expression has no effect'.
oh
$hi#.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
It looks to me like it evaluates EngineNumber == nn, but does nothing
with the result, hence 'Expression has no effect'.
--
Ross
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 16:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > It looks like the compiler has got something here:
> >
> > "../FGEngine.h", line 186: warni
> Hi Jon,
>
> It looks like the compiler has got something here:
>
> "../FGEngine.h", line 186: warning(1171): expression has no effect
> void SetEngineNumber(int nn) {EngineNumber == nn;}
Yes, I have just noticed that but cannot figure out what the hell that's all
about. Am I missing som
44 matches
Mail list logo
