Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Christopher S Horler
You've been busy this weekend, it's always nice to see the range of aircraft increasing. I'm still on my way to making the CVS work (I'm very busy here), when I do it'll be great to have a go with all these aircraft. If I'm lucky I might get something done on the spitfire model today... Chris

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Engine models: start-up and commonality betweenFDMs

2002-11-10 Thread David Megginson
Julian Foad writes: Well, I suppose it needs someone to show how the two aims can be compatible. But it's not easy; it would require becoming familiar with both implementations and re-arranging the interfaces a bit. While that's the sort of thing I do at work, I'm not yet in a

re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread David Megginson
Michael Selig writes: I have just added a Sopwith Camel to the CVS. Not only does it include the flight dynamics model, but also there's an external model from A.F. Scrub! He has granted permission for us to use and release these with FlightGear under the GNU GPL. There's a readme

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Engine models: start-up and commonality betweenFDMs

2002-11-10 Thread David Megginson
Andy Ross writes: I'd *love* to see good numbers for propeller acceleration, however. If one of the Real Pilots out there could go out with a stopwatch and get us graphs of RPM vs. time for full throttle acceleration and cut-power deceleration I'd be eternally grateful. :) I don't want

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Jim Wilson
Hi Michael, What a great addition to the fleet! Beautiful 3D model too. Would you or A.F. Scrub mind if I converted that to ac3d? The purpose would be to convert the textures to rgb, alpha the prop disk, animate, and add 3D instrumentation similar to the j3cub (which would involve a few

re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Jim Wilson
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thank you very much. It might be a good idea in the future to put 3D models directly into Aircraft/*/Models/ rather than Aircraft/*/Models/uiuc/, since 3D models are usable by all FDMs (all four major ones use the same C172 model, for example).

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Yasim origin and model offsets

2002-11-10 Thread Julian Foad
Andy Ross wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: Anyway, what I now remember is this: the camera position as configured for the chase view is always in relation to the FDM location. And in the case of Yasim that location is always the nose. Oh, good point. This will create problems for view direction

re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, Jim Wilson wrote: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thank you very much. It might be a good idea in the future to put 3D models directly into Aircraft/*/Models/ rather than Aircraft/*/Models/uiuc/, since 3D models are usable by all FDMs (all four major ones use the same

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, Jim Wilson wrote: Hi Michael, What a great addition to the fleet! Beautiful 3D model too. Would you or A.F. Scrub mind if I converted that to ac3d? The purpose would be to convert the textures to rgb, alpha the prop disk, animate, and add 3D instrumentation similar to the j3cub

re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they could always come to FGFS and fly their original models as well as any enhancements to

re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, Curt Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they could always come to FGFS and fly their original models as

[Flightgear-devel] SimGear patches for GCC 3.2: memrchr and typename

2002-11-10 Thread Julian Foad
I had to remove a declaration of memrchr from simgear/metar/Local.h to compile under gcc 3.2 (SuSE Linux 8.1). There are lots of semi-standard functions declared there that probably shouldn't be. To fix some warnings I added typename into some typedef lines. I am not sure about the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread John Check
On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:21 pm, Michael Selig wrote: At 11/10/02, Jim Wilson wrote: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thank you very much. It might be a good idea in the future to put 3D models directly into Aircraft/*/Models/ rather than Aircraft/*/Models/uiuc/, since 3D

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread John Check
On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:37 pm, Michael Selig wrote: At 11/10/02, Curt Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread John Check
On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:24 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they could always come to FGFS and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, John Check wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:21 pm, Michael Selig wrote: At 11/10/02, Jim Wilson wrote: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thank you very much. It might be a good idea in the future to put 3D models directly into Aircraft/*/Models/ rather than

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, you wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:37 pm, Michael Selig wrote: At 11/10/02, Curt Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, John Check wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:24 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they

[Flightgear-devel] Keyboard braking power

2002-11-10 Thread Julian Foad
It seems silly to have the brake key slam on full braking power, if it is to be used on the runway. No wonder the aircraft tend to tip over or burst their tyres. Can I recommend this patch which sets the all brakes strength to 0.5 and the individual left/right to 0.7? Personally I do the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, John Check wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 2:24 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Michael Selig writes: Since these are imports courtesy of developers working with MSFS, would it be a good idea to keep a copy of their models in original form in a separate directory? That way they

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Keyboard braking power

2002-11-10 Thread Andy Ross
Julian Foad wrote: It seems silly to have the brake key slam on full braking power, if it is to be used on the runway. No wonder the aircraft tend to tip over or burst their tyres. Can I recommend this patch which sets the all brakes strength to 0.5 and the individual left/right to 0.7?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Keyboard braking power

2002-11-10 Thread Julian Foad
Andy Ross wrote: Julian Foad wrote: It seems silly to have the brake key slam on full braking power, if ... This issue came up about a year ago. There really isn't any good resolution. ... My favorite hack, FWIW, was to have the on/off input affect the braking power slowly -- over a

[Flightgear-devel] Radio frequency range: min/max/wrap

2002-11-10 Thread Julian Foad
I noticed that the radios had nav. freq. range 108.00 to 117.95 but com. freq. 0 to 140; this should be 118 to 140. But while playing with that I noticed that the wrapping is a bit unpredictable. With (min=118, max=140, step=1, wrap=true) adjusting it up and down, it sometimes skips 118 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Engine models: start-up and commonality between FDMs

2002-11-10 Thread David Luff
On 11/10/02 at 4:02 AM Julian Foad wrote: As for the guts of how the engines are modelled ... I first worked on the starting and stopping behaviour of the JSBsim engine. The thermodynamic model of the engine is probably very good Parts of it are, parts of it aren't and are overdue a

re: [Flightgear-devel] C172 Taxiing speed

2002-11-10 Thread David Luff
On 11/7/02 at 4:33 PM David Megginson wrote: lots Thanks. Are major taxiways such as the one parallel to the rwy that normally seems to be called Alpha 2-way or is the traffic normally directed one-way on them by ATC depending on the rwy in use? That would be very airport specific, but

[Flightgear-devel] brakes

2002-11-10 Thread David Culp
It seems silly to have the brake key slam on full braking power, if it is to be used on the runway. No wonder the aircraft tend to tip over or burst their tyres. Can I recommend this patch which sets the all brakes strength to 0.5 and the individual left/right to 0.7? One option might be to

re: [Flightgear-devel] Keyboard braking power

2002-11-10 Thread David Megginson
Julian Foad writes: It seems silly to have the brake key slam on full braking power, if it is to be used on the runway. No wonder the aircraft tend to tip over or burst their tyres. Can I recommend this patch which sets the all brakes strength to 0.5 and the individual left/right to

re: [Flightgear-devel] C172 Taxiing speed

2002-11-10 Thread David Megginson
David Luff writes: So basically they're 2-way, but sequentially, with planes never passing wing-tip to wing-tip in opposite directions each side of the yellow line? The yellow line is where your nosewheel is supposed to be. That said, little planes pass each other all the time on taxiways

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sopwith Camel model added

2002-11-10 Thread Cameron Moore
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Selig) [2002.11.10 13:21]: At 11/10/02, Jim Wilson wrote: What a great addition to the fleet! Beautiful 3D model too. Would you or A.F. Scrub mind if I converted that to ac3d? The purpose would be to convert the textures to rgb, alpha the prop disk, animate,

[Flightgear-devel] Fokker Dr.1 model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
I have just added the Fokker Dr.1 triplane to the CVS. There are notes in the readme below about how to get a 3D model file. Unfortunately, I could not acquire one under the GNU GPL. If I were going to be in a dog fight and had my pick of the Camel or Dr.1, the Dr.1 would be the weapon of

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Fokker Dr.1 model added

2002-11-10 Thread Jon Berndt
Michael: What are your design references for the two WWI aircraft? Jon smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Fokker Dr.1 model added

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Selig
At 11/10/02, Jon Berndt wrote: Michael: What are your design references for the two WWI aircraft? Do you mean how did I get the aero data? Regards, Michael ** Prof. Michael S. Selig Dept. of Aero/Astro Engineering University of