On Wed 2. April 2003 19:07, you wrote:
> But are you starting with an image of 1024x1024 or higher? If you try
> to edit at the final resolution, you really can't avoid seeing
> aliasing artifacts. Everything has to be done in a giant buffer and
> then downsampled as the very last step.
I am star
Currently I have absolutely no idea if this one is wort looking at, but at
least they appear to have a P-51 model to probably copy details from ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Currently I have absolutely no idea if this one is wort looking at, but at
> least they appear to have a P-51 model to probably copy details from ;-)
>
who, what, where? you forgot the link. ;-)
Best,
Jim
_
Martin Spott wrote:
Currently I have absolutely no idea if this one is wort looking at, but at
least they appear to have a P-51 model to probably copy details from ;-)
URL?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> who, what, where? you forgot the link. ;-)
O, silly me. Here you are:
http://www.graphics3d.com/cpp/
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
This seems to be circulating around the net. My apologies if everyone has
seen it. Not sure that it is "authentic". I hope it isn't "political" (don't
think so). But, it is kinda interesting.
Best,
Jim
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Night Flying in Iraq off the Theodore
> Roosevelt CVN 71 in the Med.
Well, I said I was going to do it and a freak combination of holiday and nice
weather made me jump in the car and drive to the Sheffield Aero Club far
earlier than planned. After the obligatory cup of tea and handover of £92 I
found myself sat in a C152 by the name of http://www.sheffair.f9.co.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Spott) [2003.04.03 06:14]:
> Currently I have absolutely no idea if this one is wort looking at, but at
> least they appear to have a P-51 model to probably copy details from ;-)
Actually, I think Jim's P-51D is better.
--
Cameron Moore
[ Reason #73 why I can't sleep
Matthew Law writes:
> Well, I said I was going to do it and a freak combination of
> holiday and nice weather made me jump in the car and drive to the
> Sheffield Aero Club far earlier than planned. After the obligatory
> cup of tea and handover of £92 I found myself sat in a C152 by the
> n
David Megginson writes:
> Make sure she gets at least 25-50% of the proceeds for something
> *she* wants (and save a bit of a reserve for the transit passes).
I call it the wife tax. Here it is always at least 50% and usually
much more. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program
> I've never had the chance to use a grass runway -- how does it feel as
> you get close to takeoff speed? We need to start modelling the bumps
> and jolts in FlightGear.
I've taken off one (in the back seat, though), it's surprisingly
smooth. I think it's the same effect as when you ride over a
Major A writes:
>
> > I've never had the chance to use a grass runway -- how does it feel as
> > you get close to takeoff speed? We need to start modelling the bumps
> > and jolts in FlightGear.
>
> I've taken off one (in the back seat, though), it's surprisingly
> smooth. I think it's the same
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Major A writes:
> >
> > > I've never had the chance to use a grass runway -- how does it feel as
> > > you get close to takeoff speed? We need to start modelling the bumps
> > > and jolts in FlightGear.
> >
> > I've taken off one (in the back seat,
On Thursday 03 April 2003 16:16, David Megginson wrote:
> Yes, a 150 was simply too small for me -- I paid the extra money to
> train in 172s, but I think that our rates are a bit cheaper over here.
Cost-wise it simply isn't an option open to me. Also, I'm not sure but I
think the club reserves
Matthew Law writes:
> It actually felt OK - far less bumpy than the C206's I've been in
> on concrete runways. I seem to remember that he held the yoke
> quite far back early on in the take off run. Would this help? But
> I might be mistaken...
That would be a standard soft-field takeoff pr
From: Matthew Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday 03 April 2003 16:16, David Megginson wrote:
> > Yes, a 150 was simply too small for me -- I paid the extra money to
> > train in 172s, but I think that our rates are a bit cheaper over here.
> Cost-wise it simply isn't an option open to me.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seems that the base repository is down. Has it moved or something? Thanks,
David
- --
It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring
things.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+jPf+Z
The attitude indicator can now optionally tumble in extreme attitudes,
making it useless for recovery. The behaviour is controlled by the
/instrumentation/attitude-indicator/config/tumble-flag
property. We'll want to enable tumbling for most of the small planes,
at least.
All the best,
Da
Jim Wilson writes:
> The model code is returning a "not found" error (can't find a named
> object) if the object is a simple triangle or rectangle surface.
Yes, we've discussed this problem before on the list. Plib optimizes
out parent branches with only one child, so the name of an object wit
The model code is returning a "not found" error (can't find a named object) if
the object is a simple triangle or rectangle surface. There may be certain
other conditions for this to happen, I haven't gotten that far. Just thought
I'd mention this in case someone following plib closely knows of a
20 matches
Mail list logo
