Re: [Flightgear-devel] Performance analysis

2003-01-23 Thread Per Liedman
David Megginson wrote: > Per Liedman writes: > > > Not saying it's easy, not saying it's the right way to go, and > > *absolutely* not volunteering to code one for FGFS, but MSFS2002 > > definitely has CLOD which works for the whole globe, and yes - MSFS2002

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Performance analysis

2003-01-23 Thread Per Liedman
> Per Liedman writes: > > Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > > The CLOD techniques are really slick, and I've seen some cool demos. > > > However, I personally so far (and maybe something exists, I dunno) > > > have not seen anyone pull all the pieces of this toget

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Performance analysis

2003-01-23 Thread Per Liedman
y achieve high frame rates and there are no real problems pushing the far clip plane way out. Just proof that it *is* possible, given a huge amount of well paid programmers! :-) Best regards, Per Liedman ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datatid

2002-04-29 Thread Per Liedman
eta nyheter" (or something very similair, swedish and danish are a little bit different). You got the rest right - I'm impressed! :-) Regards, Per Liedman ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear, FS2K2 and GMAX

2002-03-15 Thread Per Liedman
esigned for, so I don't know how well it will work with models exported from GMAX for MSFS 2002. Regards, Per Liedman ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 aircraft files?

2002-01-06 Thread Per Liedman
On Saturday 05 January 2002 19:38, throttle1000 wrote: > I think rj? is better. He seems to have lot of knowledge about the matter. > I am bretty busy with my moving map project at the moment. And I have > no idea about what is done in the FG project so far. To me it looks a bit > messy. I would s