Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On a semi serious note, if anyone sees any pictures from the same point of
> view but at night and showing the landing lights, please post a link. It
> Would be handy in trying to work something out.
>
> Ta,
>
> LeeE
>
Try this.
http://www.airline
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:12:47 -0500, David Megginson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
>> Nope, it turns out that bathrooms are typically only on things like
>> 737's and DC-9's and stuff.
>
>Smaller planes have them as well -- on small business jets and turboprops,
>one of the
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 23:31, Andy Ross wrote:
> Lee Elliott wrote:
> > A couple of things about modelling sea-planes in FG though - a) unless
> > you start in the air, you have to start on a runway, and b) with
> > YASim, at least, you can't define the fuselage properly because part
> > of
Lee Elliott wrote:
> A couple of things about modelling sea-planes in FG though - a) unless
> you start in the air, you have to start on a runway, and b) with
> YASim, at least, you can't define the fuselage properly because part
> of it has to start below the surface and you get a collision at
> s
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 18:02, Jim Wilson wrote:
> David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Disclaimer:
> >
> > It's not my picture and not my kid :)
> >
> > The airplane is a 737-200, I think. It's definitely Boeing, no glass,
two
> > engines. The airport markings look non-US, and j
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 13:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Jon Berndt writes:
> > > Reminds me of the time I was 4 years old and flying in a Catalina
and
> >
> > Are you serious? I'm jealous. One of my favorites.
>
> Yup, wish I had been older so I could have remembered more about it.
>
>
> >
> >That's the way Boeing USED to make them.
> >Compare that cockpit to a new 737-800 ...
> >
> >The new cockpits must make pilot's lives pretty boring.
> >
> >Paul
Take a peek at the 727 and 737 here. Real analog stuff. :)
http://deltasoft.fife.wa.us/BehindTheScenes/
g.
_
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:42:06 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should settle the issue:
!GASP!
He fell OFF!
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I also noticed some covering missing on the center wind screen divider
> > with exposed wiring, made me wonder if this is a sim cockpit.
>
> That's the way Mr. Boeing makes them. No frills there :)
>
> > Also, if you look carefully at the runway number, i
Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's the way Boeing USED to make them.
Compare that cockpit to a new 737-800 ...
The new cockpits must make pilot's lives pretty boring.
Paul
http://tinyurl.com/xkxh
Yep.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing l
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Nope, it turns out that bathrooms are typically only on things like
737's and DC-9's and stuff.
Smaller planes have them as well -- on small business jets and turboprops,
one of the seats cushions often lifts up to reveal a small toilet, with a
curtain that you can pull ar
On Wednesday, 3 December 2003 20:42, David Culp wrote:
> That's the way Mr. Boeing makes them. No frills there :)
That's the way Boeing USED to make them.
Compare that cockpit to a new 737-800 ...
The new cockpits must make pilot's lives pretty boring.
Paul
> I also noticed some covering missing on the center wind screen divider
> with exposed wiring, made me wonder if this is a sim cockpit.
That's the way Mr. Boeing makes them. No frills there :)
> Also, if you look carefully at the runway number, it is quite clearly
> a two digit number. I would
Jim Wilson writes:
> David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Disclaimer:
> >
> > It's not my picture and not my kid :)
> >
> > The airplane is a 737-200, I think. It's definitely Boeing, no glass, two
> > engines. The airport markings look non-US, and judging by the high altitude
> > and
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Disclaimer:
>
> It's not my picture and not my kid :)
>
> The airplane is a 737-200, I think. It's definitely Boeing, no glass, two
> engines. The airport markings look non-US, and judging by the high altitude
> and low visibility, heading about 050, pa
Jonathan Polley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Oh, now that is just PURE EVIL. Funny, but evil just the same ;)
>
Nah it's good for him. Builds character. :-D
Yes...funny pic.
Best,
Jim
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail
David Culp wrote:
Disclaimer:
It's not my picture and not my kid :)
The airplane is a 737-200, I think. It's definitely Boeing, no glass, two
engines. The airport markings look non-US, and judging by the high altitude
and low visibility, heading about 050, parallel runways, I'd say this is
M
Disclaimer:
It's not my picture and not my kid :)
The airplane is a 737-200, I think. It's definitely Boeing, no glass, two
engines. The airport markings look non-US, and judging by the high altitude
and low visibility, heading about 050, parallel runways, I'd say this is
Mexico City.
Dave
Jon Berndt writes:
> > Reminds me of the time I was 4 years old and flying in a Catalina and
>
> Are you serious? I'm jealous. One of my favorites.
Yup, wish I had been older so I could have remembered more about it.
> > went looking for the bathroom, because of course, all airplanes have
> >
On 22:13 Tue 02 Dec , David Culp wrote:
> I brought my son to work for a day, and he had a wonderful time.
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/kidsday.jpg
At least he didn't have to hold on for much longer :)
All the best,
Matt
___
Flightgea
> Reminds me of the time I was 4 years old and flying in a Catalina and
Are you serious? I'm jealous. One of my favorites.
> went looking for the bathroom, because of course, all airplanes have
> bathrooms (something I was very convinced of when I was 4.)
Did it?
___
David Culp writes:
> I brought my son to work for a day, and he had a wonderful time.
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/kidsday.jpg
Reminds me of the time I was 4 years old and flying in a Catalina and
went looking for the bathroom, because of course, all airplanes have
bathrooms (something
I'm going to have nightmares, now. :-)
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Culp
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:14 PM
> To: flightgear-devel
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] (OT) Kid's day at work
Oh, now that is just PURE EVIL. Funny, but evil just the same ;)
On Tuesday, December 02, 2003, at 10:13PM, David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I brought my son to work for a day, and he had a wonderful time.
>
>http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/kidsday.jpg
>
>Dave
>--
>***
I brought my son to work for a day, and he had a wonderful time.
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/kidsday.jpg
Dave
--
David Culp
davidculp2[at]comcast.net
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[
25 matches
Mail list logo
