Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote: I usually plan on a full week of *all* my non-work spare time plus some to get a release out. Right now I'm getting hammered at work and at home so I don't have *any* spare time. I have to go out of town for the entire weekend which means I'll be playing catchup most of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jim Wilson wrote: Erik Hofman said: Matevz Jekovec wrote: Why not simply name it 0.9.5.1 (latest kernel is 2.6.8.1 as well as they found a tiny bug in 2.6.8 version). Letters behind a version could mess with things like a for Alpha, b for Beta, RC for Release Candidate and so on. I think

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman said: > Matevz Jekovec wrote: > > > Why not simply name it 0.9.5.1 (latest kernel is 2.6.8.1 as well as they > > found a tiny bug in 2.6.8 version). Letters behind a version could mess > > with things like a for Alpha, b for Beta, RC for Release Candidate and > > so on. I think 0.9

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Matevz Jekovec wrote: Why not simply name it 0.9.5.1 (latest kernel is 2.6.8.1 as well as they found a tiny bug in 2.6.8 version). Letters behind a version could mess with things like a for Alpha, b for Beta, RC for Release Candidate and so on. I think 0.9.5.1 is the only logical explenation to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Are you sure js changes are fixes ? I saw problem reports recently. They seem to have been fixed. But I wouldn't know, I don't have a joystick. I don't update plib for ages and I am not keen to do it after what I read. Moreover, we rely on plib released versions, not CVS,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Matevz Jekovec
Erik Hofman wrote: Kalle Valo wrote: Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1, please. That would create lots of confusion for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Erik Hofman wrote: > Erik Hofman wrote: > > Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > >> What specific changes are you refering to? > > > > > > Fixes for the "Scenery Loading" dialog that now loads much faster on low > > end hardware because it is frame rate independent (thanks to Frederic). > > > > Lot

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Erik Hofman wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote: What specific changes are you refering to? Fixes for the "Scenery Loading" dialog that now loads much faster on low end hardware because it is frame rate independent (thanks to Frederic). Lots of small fixes (joystick configurations, Nasal fuel handling

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-16 Thread Chris Metzler
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:08:42 +0200 Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1, >> please. That would create lots of confusion for both users and >> distribution packagers. > > Good point, I realized that aft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Kalle Valo wrote: Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1, please. That would create lots of confusion for both users and dis

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: Hi, I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? I have the feeling that it does. I realize Curtis is busy for the next two weeks so it has to wait some more, but if this is desired I will hold

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-16 Thread Kalle Valo
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or > so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1, please. That would create lots of confusion for both users and distribution pack

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Erik Hofman wrote: Hi, I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? I have the feeling that it does. I realize Curtis is busy for the next two weeks so it has to wait some more, but if this is desired I will hold off any drastic changes

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 0.9.5-1

2004-08-15 Thread Erik Hofman
Hi, I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? I have the feeling that it does. I realize Curtis is busy for the next two weeks so it has to wait some more, but if this is desired I will hold off any drastic changes to the code until