Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit :
> Gerard Robin wrote:
> > with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
> > retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
> > problems .
>
> I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim
On Saturday 11 Jun 2005 16:35, Andy Ross wrote:
> Lee Elliott wrote:
> > One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the
> > fuselage mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a
> > crash. While I was experimenting with the SR45 I found that
> > I had to omit the lower fuselage deck t
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit :
> Gerard Robin wrote:
> > with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
> > retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
> > problems .
>
> I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim
> Andy wrote:
>
> whereas YASim allows different gear object
> to retract independently.
!!!
... now there's a thought. Hmmm. I feel a feature request coming for JSBSim. :-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
ht
Gerard Robin wrote:
> with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
> retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
> problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all but
identical* gear systems. Can you please post the YASim c
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 08:39 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit :
> Gerard Robin wrote:
> > I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
> > been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
> > stand correctly on water with gear-up.
> >
> > To answer that, JSBSim gi
Gerard Robin wrote:
> I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
> been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
> stand correctly on water with gear-up.
>
> To answer that, JSBSim gives a better flexibility.
Both JSBSim and YASim use manually placed g
Lee Elliott wrote:
> One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the fuselage
> mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a crash. While I
> was experimenting with the SR45 I found that I had to omit the
> lower fuselage deck to achieve this, which must then affect the
> flying accura
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 10:20 +0100, Lee Elliott a écrit :
> On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
> > theoreticle wrote:
> > > Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
> > > Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
> > > half loaded with fuel. The ac
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
> theoreticle wrote:
> > Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
> > Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
> > half loaded with fuel. The actual aircraft will sink it's
> > fuselage as far as 5 feet into the wa
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 17:27 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper, that
> wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with fuel. The
> actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
>
theoreticle wrote:
> Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper,
> that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with
> fuel. The actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet
> into the water, perhaps more if landing in 'seas'. There absolutel
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper, that
wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with fuel. The
actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
perhaps more if landing in 'seas'. There absolutely must be some code to
13 matches
Mail list logo
