Le samedi 11 juin 2005 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
theoreticle wrote:
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
half loaded with fuel. The actual aircraft will sink it's
fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 10:20 +0100, Lee Elliott a crit :
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
theoreticle wrote:
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
half loaded with fuel. The actual aircraft
Lee Elliott wrote:
One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the fuselage
mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a crash. While I
was experimenting with the SR45 I found that I had to omit the
lower fuselage deck to achieve this, which must then affect the
flying accuracy.
Gerard Robin wrote:
I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
stand correctly on water with gear-up.
To answer that, JSBSim gives a better flexibility.
Both JSBSim and YASim use manually placed gear
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 08:39 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
stand correctly on water with gear-up.
To answer that, JSBSim gives a better
Gerard Robin wrote:
with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all but
identical* gear systems. Can you please post the YASim
Andy wrote:
whereas YASim allows different gear object
to retract independently.
!!!
... now there's a thought. Hmmm. I feel a feature request coming for JSBSim. :-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all
On Saturday 11 Jun 2005 16:35, Andy Ross wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the
fuselage mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a
crash. While I was experimenting with the SR45 I found that
I had to omit the lower fuselage deck to
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper, that
wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with fuel. The
actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
perhaps more if landing in 'seas'. There absolutely must be some code to
theoreticle wrote:
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper,
that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with
fuel. The actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet
into the water, perhaps more if landing in 'seas'. There absolutely
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 17:27 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit :
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am Clipper, that
wants to land fully loaded with passengers and half loaded with fuel. The
actual aircraft will sink it's fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
13 matches
Mail list logo
