Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My Video Card Suspected

2006-06-21 Thread Chris Metzler
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:14:33 -0500 Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > I reinstalled my previous card shortly ago, an Inno3D GeForce2 MX400. > Once again, I had OpenGL capability. It worked fine. I reinstalled the > new card, the eVGA GeForce 6800. I reinstalled the drivers. Once again: > > DirectX: Works >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My Video Card Suspected

2006-06-21 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> > Jon > > > > Your 6800 and the NVIDIA drivers are probably fine or > > else the net would be abuzz about it being a bad card I reinstalled my previous card shortly ago, an Inno3D GeForce2 MX400. Once again, I had OpenGL capability. It worked fine. I reinstalled the new card, the eVGA GeForce 68

[Flightgear-devel] Incidence in YASim

2006-06-21 Thread Lee Elliott
Hi all, I've been looking in to the INCIDENCE control-axis in YASim and although it's there and appears to function, it appears to be normalised and I can't see what angle it's normalised to - 90 deg, 360 deg ? Anyone any idea? LeeE All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the C

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* dene maxwell -- Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:55: > I answered a previous post before before reading yours could this > problem have existed for a while (previous versions)? No. It was a kind of copy&paste error that I committed recently, with this log message: revision 1.47 date: 2006-06-

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread dene maxwell
>From: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions > >To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak >Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:54:54 +0200 > >* Lee Elliott -- Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:39: > > I haven't tried

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread dene maxwell
>From: Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],FlightGear developers discussions > >To: FlightGear developers discussions > >Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak >Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:43:55 +0100 > >On Wednesday 21 June 2006 08:35, dene maxwell wrote: > > >From:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Lee Elliott -- Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:39: > I haven't tried using other fonts yet either, to establish if > it's just with the LED font or with any font. Fixed. Sorry too all. :-) m. All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The hig

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Lee Elliott wrote: > Hi all, > > I think I may have a lead on this now, and it turns out that > there was a connection with the 2D radio stacks but probably not > one that many would suspect. > > First of all I commented out all the instruments on both the vfr > and mini panels to see if just re

[Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Lee Elliott
Hi all, I think I may have a lead on this now, and it turns out that there was a connection with the 2D radio stacks but probably not one that many would suspect. First of all I commented out all the instruments on both the vfr and mini panels to see if just revealing/loading the panels start

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Problem with Sukhoi 26 panel

2006-06-21 Thread flying.toaster
Understood the problem ... Panels have their coordinates with a bottom left origin whereas instruments have a center origin ... My mistake Sorry for the inconvenience ... All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Re

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Lee Elliott
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 08:35, dene maxwell wrote: > >From: Torsten Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions > > > >To: FlightGear developers discussions > > > >Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak > >Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:58:31 +0200 > > > >If this is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:23:04 +0200, Erik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > ..hmm. Nvidea. So here we and Nvidea needs to trust Microsoft. > > Didn't we (they) always? > ;-) .. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a numbe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..hmm. Nvidea. So here we and Nvidea needs to trust Microsoft. Didn't we (they) always? ;-) Erik -- http://www.ehtw.info (Dutch)Future of Enschede Airport Twente http://www.ehofman.com/fgfs FlightGear Flight Simulator

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:02:20 +0200, Erik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > ..just a WAG: I remember seing some Gloklaw discussion on Microsoft > > policy on dropping OpenGL for Longhorn alias Vista alias etc, could > > this be happening now ? > > Yes and no. Mi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-21 Thread Christian Mayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Hofman schrieb: > Olaf Flebbe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The comment for fast_log is IMHO incorrect. >> >> /** >> * This function is about 3 times faster than the system log() function >> * and has an error of about 0.01% >> */ >> >> The relative error c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identifiedasproblematic

2006-06-21 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> Jon > > Your 6800 and the NVIDIA drivers are probably fine or > else the net would be abuzz about it being a bad card > > I suspect that you are picking up a wrong DLL at runtime > > Werent you playing with MingW compiles at one time ? I suspected that could be a problem, but: 1) I went into s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified asproblematic

2006-06-21 Thread Norman Vine
Jon S. Berndt writes: > > Given the earlier reported segfault at gluPickMatrix, I decided to try some > of the test programs in the tests directory in the FlightGear distribution. > Needless to say, these tests are a wonderful idea and immediately pointed > the finger at OpenGL. I got an immediate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..just a WAG: I remember seing some Gloklaw discussion on Microsoft > policy on dropping OpenGL for Longhorn alias Vista alias etc, could this > be happening now ? Yes and no. Microsoft agreed to add a direct rendering API for OpenGL driver implementors (or opened it up o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Olaf Flebbe wrote: > Hi, > > The comment for fast_log is IMHO incorrect. > > /** > * This function is about 3 times faster than the system log() function > * and has an error of about 0.01% > */ > > The relative error can be larger than 7% it is almost nowhere about > 0.01% when used in the rang

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread dene maxwell
>From: Torsten Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions > >To: FlightGear developers discussions > >Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak >Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:58:31 +0200 > >If this is of any help - starting with the ufo on the ground and sitting >th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
And BTW fast_log2 don't work correctly with denormalized numbers, i.e. very small numbers, which can easily happen when cancellation effects occur. Try x = 1.e-45 and you get an error of more then 14%. (This is enormous for a log() type function). Please remove this function and use log() instea