Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATIS audio +- default.vce

2007-02-19 Thread dedmons
Hey all: I wrote a simple ATIS replacement for an old 286 based VTK system for one of our simulators. None of the code would be of any use here, but there are numerous audio files I recoded using my Ham radio and adjusted the levels while monitoring the audio on an o-scope. They aren't great, bu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATIS audio +- default.vce

2007-02-19 Thread Holger Wirtz
John, On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:57:10PM -0500, John Denker wrote: > It appears that interest is coming from multiple directions, > interest in upgrading the audio overall, plus particular > interest in having usable ATIS audio. This is not unrelated > to the effort to handle non-ISA-standard-day

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft/Instruments-3d/mag.sw/

2007-02-19 Thread Dave Perry
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 15:45 +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > Can people, please, choose meaningful names for files/dirs in "public > space"? This directory could simply have been called "magneto-switch" > or "mag-switch" if it really, *really* needs to be short. But "sw" is > IMHO a bad and non-obvio

[Flightgear-devel] 787

2007-02-19 Thread Laurence Vanek
I love this model. My company is designing hardware for this aircraft. Very nice work. Now starts up ok using FG cvs OSG (used to crash on initialization). I get these messages at in terminal window: === . . . Nasal runtime error: function/method call invoked on uncallable object at /h

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Possible bug in b1900d display of avionics.

2007-02-19 Thread
Ed Sirett wrote: > If you rotate your view towards the avionics stack and zoom in with 'X' > I find that at some point the red figures on the displays simply > disappear. > > When this happens all the radio displays (NAV, COM and ADF) go blank. > Changing the level of zoom brings the numbers back

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATIS audio +- default.vce

2007-02-19 Thread Dave
John Denker wrote: > It appears that interest is coming from multiple directions, > interest in upgrading the audio overall, plus particular > interest in having usable ATIS audio. This is not unrelated > to the effort to handle non-ISA-standard-day weather conditions, > since if you're going to h

[Flightgear-devel] Possible bug in b1900d display of avionics.

2007-02-19 Thread Ed Sirett
If you rotate your view towards the avionics stack and zoom in with 'X' I find that at some point the red figures on the displays simply disappear. When this happens all the radio displays (NAV, COM and ADF) go blank. Changing the level of zoom brings the numbers back but not every time. Is th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Curtis Olson
On 2/19/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, you are right. The customer gets them set up, not knowing about them. And everyone else can look at the source code. For more serious work this will probably always be necessary. Not that it can't all be documented, but it's a lot of work

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 19 February 2007: > * Curtis Olson -- Monday 19 February 2007: > > How do you do: > > > > set /sim/audio/play /usr/local/share/sounds/ foo.wav ? > > Simple and without overengineering::-P > > set /sim/audio/play /usr/local/share/sounds/ > set /sim/audio/play

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis Olson -- Monday 19 February 2007: > I don't think it's fair to characterize these as secret features that can > only be used by one customer. OK, you are right. The customer gets them set up, not knowing about them. And everyone else can look at the source code. For more serious work this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Georg Vollnhals schrieb: > Melchior FRANZ schrieb: > >> * >> Works here. But I compile from source, because AFAIK it does indeed >> demand Python 2.4 by default. See attached my very trivial >> user-config.py. >> ... >> m. >> >> > Thanks for the hint. I will try to compile Blender

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Curtis Olson
On 2/19/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I don't like secret features that can only be used by one "customer", and are of no use for the majority of users. That doesn't mean that I would like to see the extra commands in "help", because this is exactly the clutter that doesn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 19 February 2007: > And "set /sim/screenshot 1"? Or even better: set /sim/screenshot /tmp/crashed-again.tga :-) m. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis Olson -- Monday 19 February 2007: > My intent here isn't to try to contest each and every point, but let me > continue on with the discussion. And it wasn't the least intent to have yet another argument. In the end, it would probably just mean more work for me, so leaving the hacks in the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Curtis Olson
On 2/19/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not enthusiastic about ripping this direct procedure call functionality > out and replacing it with a complicated set of nasal based indirections. Who said "nasal"?! I said "listener". You know that Nasal listeners are only wrappers ar

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 19 February 2007: > Who said "nasal"?! I said "listener". You know that Nasal listeners > are only wrappers around the real listeners (SGPropertyChangeListener). > I meant such a C++ listener -- they were made exactly for such > purposes. Err ... and I really meant tied

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis Olson -- Monday 19 February 2007: > On 2/19/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-sea-level-air-temp-degc" ) { > > } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-outside-air-temp-degc" ) { > > } else if ( tokens[1] == "timeofday" ) { > > } else if ( tokens[

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Curtis Olson
On 2/19/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And while we are at it, we should get rid of this ugliness: } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-sea-level-air-temp-degc" ) { [...] } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-outside-air-temp-degc" ) { [...] } else if ( tokens[1] == "timeofday" ) {

[Flightgear-devel] ATIS audio +- default.vce

2007-02-19 Thread John Denker
It appears that interest is coming from multiple directions, interest in upgrading the audio overall, plus particular interest in having usable ATIS audio. This is not unrelated to the effort to handle non-ISA-standard-day weather conditions, since if you're going to have a non-standard day, you n

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Melchior FRANZ schrieb: > * Georg Vollnhals -- Monday 19 February 2007: > >> this is all very nice but the bad message is that blender 2.43 still >> does not run external *.py plug-ins with Python 2.5 installed on the >> system. >> > > Works here. But I compile from source, because AFAIK i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
The proof of the pudding: $ cat /etc/SuSE-release openSUSE 10.2 (i586) VERSION = 10.2 $ blender --version guessing 'blender' == '/usr/local/bin/blender' Blender 2.43 $ python --version Python 2.5 $ gcc --version|head -1 gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) $

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Georg Vollnhals -- Monday 19 February 2007: > this is all very nice but the bad message is that blender 2.43 still > does not run external *.py plug-ins with Python 2.5 installed on the > system. Works here. But I compile from source, because AFAIK it does indeed demand Python 2.4 by default. S

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Melchior FRANZ schrieb: > Available here: http://www.blender.org/ > New features: http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-243/ > > Most relevant for fgfs developers: > - vastly improved ac3d-importer (tested on 388 models in fg/cvs :-) > - quite good integrated unwrapper and texture

Re: [Flightgear-devel] altimetry method ... alpha version

2007-02-19 Thread Dave Perry
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 18:02 -0700, Dave Perry wrote: > I am not sure the new patch is giving the > same results, but I have not done any controlled comparisons;... I will > double check and compare some examples with the previous patch. > I was wrong. Both are giving the same results, much impr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
And while we are at it, we should get rid of this ugliness: } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-sea-level-air-temp-degc" ) { [...] } else if ( tokens[1] == "set-outside-air-temp-degc" ) { [...] } else if ( tokens[1] == "timeofday" ) { [...] } else if ( tokens[1] == "play-audio-message" ) {

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Martin Spott
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > As a first step I'd change all occurrences of --props in the > documentation to --telnet and add a warning message in the code. I never knew that these two are in fact identical. If this is really the case, then I'm certainly in favour of the proposed action. If you're go

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Connecting to FG

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Pep Ribal -- Monday 19 February 2007: > What I've done: I've started FG with the option --props=5400; I've > startet a successful telnet session in the same host, and everything > works fine. Please use --telnet instead. (Not that it makes any difference. :-) > But I can't manage to make an a

[Flightgear-devel] [RFC] depreciation of --props option

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
I suggest to finally phase out the --props option. It's badly named and has been superseded by the --telnet option, to which it is identical: - properties ("props") can be read/set via other networking options, too, such as with --httpd, so the name --props is misleading - there's also the --pro

[Flightgear-devel] Connecting to FG

2007-02-19 Thread Pep Ribal
Hi all, I'm trying to make a simple application that just retrieves the FG status via the property tree. What I've done: I've started FG with the option --props=5400; I've startet a successful telnet session in the same host, and everything works fine. But I can't manage to make an app that does

[Flightgear-devel] Aircraft/Instruments-3d/mag.sw/

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
Can people, please, choose meaningful names for files/dirs in "public space"? This directory could simply have been called "magneto-switch" or "mag-switch" if it really, *really* needs to be short. But "sw" is IMHO a bad and non-obvious choice for a switch. m.

[Flightgear-devel] fg_sqawk Version 0.2.1beta

2007-02-19 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, I put a slightly better version of fg_sqawk on my web server: http://squonk.abacab.org/dokuwiki/fg_sqawk This is version 0.2.1beta. Read the changes that were made after the first responses from the users. Thanks Martin for testing the conference system! 0.2.1beta * iaxcli static l

[Flightgear-devel] Blender 2.43 released

2007-02-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
Available here: http://www.blender.org/ New features: http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-243/ Most relevant for fgfs developers: - vastly improved ac3d-importer (tested on 388 models in fg/cvs :-) - quite good integrated unwrapper and texture baker (with support for seams an