Re: [Flightgear-devel] "scale" animation change -- checking aircraft required

2007-06-18 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Stewart Andreason -- Tuesday 19 June 2007: > Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > Note that a single 0.123 > > does *not* work on fg/plib. ^^^ > I was using a single in several places... but after specifying > all three axis, it needed fixing. *fg/plib*! You are using fg/osg,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] "scale" animation change -- checking aircraft required

2007-06-18 Thread Stewart Andreason
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > Note that a single 0.123 > does *not* work on fg/plib. Never has. So you need the three x/y/z > offsets of 1 there, too. > > What Never? I was using a single in several places... but after specifying all three axis, it needed fixing. I've made several changes and enh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] keyboard.xml question

2007-06-18 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Holger Wirtz -- Monday 18 June 2007: > I tried the following but I never get the value 2: > > property-assign > /instrumentation/comm/ptt > 0 > > > >property-assign >/instrumentation/comm/ptt >2 > > You mixed up the normal (key-

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear at the 25th Falklands/Malvinas Anniversary - Report

2007-06-18 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, As I mentioned in a previous post, I demonstrated FlightGear at our local Museum of Flight near Edinburgh, Scotland, as part of their events for the 25th anniversary of the Falklands Conflict. For those who might be interested in doing something similar, here's my report. The event was

[Flightgear-devel] keyboard.xml question

2007-06-18 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, I have a simple(?) question about the file keyboard.xml: I have a property named /instrumentation/comm/ptt where I will show if a PTT key for the communication radio is pressed. For this I use the key "y" and this works fine (1=pressed, 0=unpressed). Now I want to use this key in combination

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread Jon S. Berndt
John Denker wrote: > That's an interesting question. > > So there's not a clean division between "instrumentation" and > "other". > > 2) But wait, there's more. The FDM's model of the atmosphere > model is blissfully ignorant of the properties of the actual > air mass. If you change the local ba

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread Vivian Meazza
John > Sent: 18 June 2007 10:41 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable > to indicate altitude above 61831 feet > > > On 06/18/2007 04:06 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote: > snip > > 4) By the way, did you ever wonder what "osi" means, in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread alexis bory
John Denker a écrit : > 4) By the way, did you ever wonder what "osi" means, in the context > of the mp-osi property? The only documentation I can find on the > subject is here: > http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-May/017373.html > The only problem is that it is 100%

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 18 June 2007 10:06, Stefan Seifert wrote: > John Denker wrote: > > If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately > > 62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx > > > >You can contrast that with the ISA table that goes up to 278,000 > >feet as found

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread John Denker
On 06/18/2007 04:06 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote: >> If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately >> 62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx > Just for my understanding: this table is only used for instrumentation, > isn't it? > Both JSBSim and YASim have their

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable to indicate altitude above 61831 feet

2007-06-18 Thread Stefan Seifert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John Denker wrote: > If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately > 62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx > >You can contrast that with the ISA table that goes up to 278,000 >feet as found e.g. at th