Hello Gerard,
very nice Aircraft indeed
Am Freitag, den 29.06.2007, 23:07 +0200 schrieb gh.robin:
> On Fri 29 June 2007 21:55, Martin Spott wrote:
> > "gh.robin" wrote:
> > > On Fri 29 June 2007 19:02, Martin Spott wrote:
> > > > Woohooo, did anyone try putting this baby into a low-speed stall ?
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> On June 29, 2007 01:44:27 pm Curtis Olson wrote:
> > I got to see it a day earlier, even before the folks that have
> > plunked down $100k to get on the waiting list got to see it ... but all the
> > employees got to see it before me.
> I'm more interested in those g
* Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 29 June 2007:
> http://members.aon.at/mfranz/ai.nas [1.7 kB]
>
> It's a bit faster, too, although 8.7 seconds for EHAM/parking.xml
> is still a lot (was 12.8 before).
And that comes from bad Nasal code, not from the c(++) expat/EasyXML
parser code, which is very fast
On Saturday 30 June 2007 09:11:36 Detlef Faber wrote:
> very nice Aircraft indeed
Speaking of which, here is a very interesting story:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/scotland/highlands_and_islands/6245802.stm
Nick
--
Free Software Foundation Associate Member 5508
An airliner some years ago crashed into the Everglades in Florida because the
autopilot
was unknowingly disengaged by accidental knee pressure on the Yoke as the pilot
was getting out of his seat. Specs showed that the minimum 45 pounds pressure
required was faulty.
The aircraft had been in a h
In the plib branch,
diff -r 131a68f9fb0c autogen.sh
--- a/autogen.shFri Jun 29 15:34:40 2007 +
+++ b/autogen.shSat Jun 30 07:50:40 2007 -0600
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
OSTYPE=`uname -s`
MACHINE=`uname -m`
-AUTO_MAKE_VERSION=`automake --version | head -1 | awk '{print $4}' |
sed -e 's/
On Sat 30 June 2007 10:11, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Hello Gerard,
>
> very nice Aircraft indeed
>
> > > > > Woohooo, did anyone try putting this baby into a low-speed stall ?
> > > > > Make sure to gain enough altitude before !
> > > >
> > > > yes it is given to stall at 91 kt, the model with that "c
On 06/30/2007 09:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An airliner some years ago crashed into the Everglades in Florida
> because the autopilot
> was unknowingly disengaged by accidental knee pressure on the Yoke as
> the pilot
> was getting out of his seat. Specs showed that the minimum 45 pounds
Those are complex issues about disengaging autopilot. Your comments
helped me to understand why the FG aircraft sometimes does gyrations when
disengaging
the VOR NAV setting Ctrl-N. I'll try setting the controls to neutral before
hitting Ctrl-N
to disengage.
Tom
- Original Message
Nice explanation.
As a non-novice non-expert with a plain old joystick, I would prefer
that when I engage the autopilot that the autopilot does its thing and
my (untouched) joystick doesn't fight with it. Otherwise the autopilot
is useless. So ignoring the joystick seems like the right thing to do
John Denker
> Sent: 30 June 2007 17:16
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [off list] patch forcontrol
> lockingbyautopilot
>
> Note that there are four stages of sophistication among FG users:
> a) Using the keyboard for primary flight control;
> b) U
On 06/30/2007 02:21 PM, Hans Fugal wrote:
> Nice explanation.
:-)
> What would happen if the yoke
> movements were additive to the autopilot, similar to how they are
> additive to the current trim settings
Interesting question; see below.
> (and indeed the autopilot changes trim settings).
Hello.
As a very first attempt to contribute to the flightgear source code, I
have tried to write a patch that automatically sets a scenery model's
elevation to ground level at the object's site if an elevation < is
defined in the .stg file.
At this point, many thanks to Melchior, who g
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Bechtold wrote:
> As a very first attempt to contribute to the flightgear source code, I
> have tried to write a patch that automatically sets a scenery model's
> elevation to ground level at the object's site if an elevation < is
> defined in the .stg file.
For s
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-25_10:29:45 (mfranz)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/environment/visual_enviro.cxx
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/environment/visual_enviro.hxx
revert last change (part of the radar patch). It changed the interface for
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-24_03:05:30 (mfranz)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Instrumentation/wxradar.cxx
fix the most horrible indentation crimes :-}
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-24_03:30:56 (mfranz)
/var/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-24_10:23:36 (mfranz)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/puff-impact.ac
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/puff-new.rgb
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/smoke-impact.xml
/var/cvs/Flig
Hi Hans,
>> Now I'm working on building both 0.9.11-pre1 and cvs head.
>> I had some errors in linking osgViewer (when building fgfs cvs-head/
>> OSG-svn head)
>> OSG-2.0 seems OK so I'll go with it for cvs-head for a while.
>> By the way, do you know which revision/tag is suitable for building
>>
18 matches
Mail list logo
