Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * James Turner -- Wednesday 17 December 2008:
> > > + var KT2MPS = 0.51; # knots to m/s
>
> > Personally I think all these constants would be easier to
> > read if they were written the same way as the Simgear ones,
> > i.e MPS_TO_KT, NM_TO_M and so on.
On 12/17/2008 12:33 AM, James Turner wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2008, at 01:03, Melchior Franz wrote:
>
>> + var KT2MPS = 0.51; # knots to m/s
>> + var MPS2KT = 1 / KT2MPS;
>> +
>> var LB2KG = 0.45359237;# pounds to kilogram
>> var KG2LB = 1 / LB2KG;
>
> Personally I
- "gerard robin" a écrit :
> On mardi 16 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Hi Fred,
> >
> > On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:50:51 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > I replied that the target is next Friday. After that I may have
> > > difficulties to build a binary from where I will be.
> > >
It seems I introduced a bug in the airports code some time ago, which
has gone rather unnoticed, or somehow I escaped the blame for it: in
the 'tower' view, where the tower position is explicitly given in
apt.dat (most of the larger airports), I was incorrectly treating the
tower elevation
On 17 Dec 2008, at 15:44, Syd wrote:
> I dont know if this makes sense to anyone else , but to me the first
> version is a word , the second option is a sentence :)
Agreed completely - the issue is, I think of all these things as
sentences (well, phrases, anyway) - so I find FOO2BAR rather lik
Hi All,
Attached is a very small patch that fixes the issue reported by Martin where
--prop:/environment/weather-scenario=METAR had no effect.
I think this is a pretty safe patch that should be included in the release.
-Stuart
flightgear.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
I wrote:
> Subject:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is a very small patch that fixes the issue reported by Martin where
> --prop:/environment/weather-scenario=METAR had no effect.
>
> I think this is a pretty safe patch that should be included in the release.
>
> -Stuart
Sorry for the lack of su
On mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> - "gerard robin" a écrit :
> > On mardi 16 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > > Hi Fred,
> > >
> > > On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:50:51 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > > I replied that the target is next Friday. After that I may have
>
Hello,
I have encounterd a little bit strange thing in Flightgear v1.0.0. I'm
implementing I/O communication with Flightgear using native-fdm protocol and
TPC sockets. I would like implement following communication.
1. In Matlab - Simulink are computed positions, velocities etc using
Simulink airc
Hi Gerard,
> Hello, Durk
>
> How do you schedule the period test with OSG 2.8 before rolling up the
> release ?
> OR do you avoid any test with it ?
>
> Cheers
As Fred mentioned, I'm routinely building and testing FlightGear against
OSG/SVN. I haven't noticed any problems. I have the impressi
- "gerard robin" a écrit :
> On mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > - "gerard robin" a écrit :
> > > On mardi 16 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > > > Hi Fred,
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:50:51 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > > > I replied that the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * James Turner -- Wednesday 17 December 2008:
>
>>> + var KT2MPS = 0.51; # knots to m/s
>>>
>
>
>> Personally I think all these constants would be easier to
>> read if they were written the same way as the Simgear ones,
>> i.e MPS_TO_KT, NM_T
On mardi 16 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:50:51 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > I replied that the target is next Friday. After that I may have
> > difficulties to build a binary from where I will be.
> >
> > -Fred
>
> How would your availability be af
James Turner wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008, at 00:53, Syd wrote:
>
>
>> Looks good so far , Ive been thinking along the same lines for the
>> Primus 1000.
>> I dont know the specs for that instrument , but the Primus can only
>> display a maximum of 4 airports, 4 navaids , etc , which should be
>> easi
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> var MPS_TO_KT = MPS2KT;
>
> What do other Nasal developers think? I'm willing to change it if
> others have problems with that, too. (And to change all occurrences
> in the repository.)
No problem here with shorter names for the constants. For me they are
easy to reco
On mercredi 17 décembre 2008, John Denker wrote:
> On 12/17/2008 12:33 AM, James Turner wrote:
> > On 17 Dec 2008, at 01:03, Melchior Franz wrote:
> >> + var KT2MPS = 0.51; # knots to m/s
> >> + var MPS2KT = 1 / KT2MPS;
> >> +
> >> var LB2KG = 0.45359237;# pound
Hi Tat et al.,
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 18:16:29 Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> >> Personally, I think a big build up to an oddball version number like
> >> 1.99.5 is a little strange, but again, I'm not so hung up on version
> >> numbers as long as they keep increasing. It would also
Durk Talsma wrote:
> Just to make a blunt suggestion, although not completely of my own
> imagination: would it be an idea to release this version as 2.0?. Initially,
> we wanted to do a 1.9.0 release, because we felt that the OSG transition
> wasn't quite there yet. Since then, enormous progre
>
> There are still problems with the clouds (the draw order
> problem with
> particles), and Tim has already mentioned his intention to
> start
> committing the code required for shadows after this
> release. I believe
> that code also makes landing lights a possibility. I'd
> be tempted to
A couple more six-legged crawly things:
41:: c172p: As of rc2, if the pilot is tall or if the pilot's seat is
cranked up high, a weird artifact appears in the field of view. To
demonstrate this, use the property viewer to set
/sim/current-view/y-offset-m to 0.4 (instead of the default value of
* Durk Talsma -- Wednesday 17 December 2008:
> would it be an idea to release this version as 2.0?.
I'm against that. fgfs is in acceptable shape for a minor
release, but it would be an embarrassment for a major release.
Curt says he doesn't care about version numbers, but the
"community" certainl
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 17 December 2008:
> [...] 0.95 (or something like that)
Err ... 1.95
> Before we drop the 0.9* idea, [...]
and 1.9*. But I guess you got the idea. :-)
m.
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Attached is a very small patch that fixes the issue reported by
> Martin where --prop:/environment/weather-scenario=METAR had no
> effect.
Oh, great ! thanks a lot,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Ok, this might be a silly question but here it goes, Will the final 1.99
release be on the main flightgear website and replace 1.0 on the site?
Thanks
--
Michael Smith (mdsmith2)
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09
On mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> - "gerard robin" a écrit :
> > On mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > - "gerard robin" a écrit :
> > > > On mardi 16 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > > > > Hi Fred,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday 13 December
On 17 Dec 2008, at 20:28, Syd wrote:
> Just a request while your tweaking the route-manager , I'll keep my
> fingers out of it :)
> I use it as an FMS for my aircraft with such instruments , but what
> would be convenient is a property to flag when the TTG switches from
> hours to minutes ...
P
James Turner wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2008, at 20:28, Syd wrote:
>
>
>> Just a request while your tweaking the route-manager , I'll keep my
>> fingers out of it :)
>> I use it as an FMS for my aircraft with such instruments , but what
>> would be convenient is a property to flag when the TTG switches
43:: CPU hog: When the sim is paused, it eats CPU cycles. It will
happily use 99+% of the CPU if there is no competition. I don't
understand why any appreciable CPU cycles are needed during pause.
44:: Memory hog: When the sim is paused, if you leave it alone for 15
minutes or so, it starts
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:04 AM, John Denker wrote:
>
> 43:: CPU hog: When the sim is paused, it eats CPU cycles. It will
> happily use 99+% of the CPU if there is no competition. I don't
> understand why any appreciable CPU cycles are needed during pause.
I assume you are not using sync-to-v
On 12/17/2008 08:04 PM, Csaba Halász wrote:
> I assume you are not using sync-to-vblank or fps throttle.
That's a correct assumption. Forsooth, I've never heard of
sync-to-vblank or fps throttle in this context. The names
sound nice, but
-- They are not mentioned in --help --verbose
-- They
An unrelated question for you - I'm using the B1900d to test my GPS
> changes, since it has the best GPS setup that I can find - I'm a
> little surprised by the way CDI deviation is handled - I was led to
> believe that in normal VOR mode, one 'dot' of CDI deviation usually
> corresponded to
31 matches
Mail list logo
