Thought I'd chime in here, as I've been going through the git
transition pains myself recently, and the other answers have been all
about the "what" and not the "why" of the task.
Git adds an extra level of indirection that you're not used to: the
cvs/svn model of the world had only one repository
Reagan Thomas wrote:
> Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>
>> i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD.
>> OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC).
>> This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse
>> engeneering if lisence agreements
Thanks for the links , I'll do some reading tonight . I was just a surprised
because I hadn't seen it mentioned on the dev-list . Or I just missed that
one maybe :)
Cheers
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:01 AM, wrote:
>
> > Glad to know it's just not me. I wonder if it has anything to do with
> > this
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:20 -0500, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Here's a dumb git question.
>
>
> Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or
> screwed up a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the
> repository version, I could just remove the file and run "cvs/svn
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Here's a dumb git question.
>
> Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or screwed up
> a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the repository
> version, I could just remove the file and run "cvs/svn update" and the
git stash.
WARNING: This will remove ALL of your custom changes IIRC. Be careful.
Otherwise just do git checkout path/to/file if you have accidentally
deleted a file.
> Here's a dumb git question.
>
>
> Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or
> screwed up a file really b
I figured to not delete the file and use the revert option. (using
tortoisegit on win7)
Not sure if there is a better way to do this.
Cheers, Oliver
_
Von: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Juni 2010 22:21
An: FlightGear developers discussions
Betreff: [
Here's a dumb git question.
Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or screwed up
a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the repository
version, I could just remove the file and run "cvs/svn update" and the
missing file would be noticed, and the system would
Things have certainly changed.
Back in 1995 I was helping to run a Virtual American Airlines and after 4 or so
months of operating actively (FS95 it was!) we got a letter stating we had to
shut down immediately or start paying licensing costs, which were thousands per
day if I recall correctly
Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
> i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD.
> OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC).
> This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse
> engeneering if lisence agreements (e.g. eula) did not take care o
> Glad to know it's just not me. I wonder if it has anything to do with
> this new cloud creating menu ?
Certainly not - completely separate system.
> Which I haven't quite figured out the purpose of ,
> wasn't the METAR string supposed to
> handle the user defined weather ?
If you pass a META
Don't bother asking Willie on this.
Willie is quite happy with the New Features forum for now. I haven't
posted there yet but intend to be punting GSoC quite heavily there soon.
Just how I go about this will be influenced by replies I get from
another ongoing thread in flightgear-devel.
This i
I've been tinkering around with a JEE ATC support web app concept,
the idea is to support ATC controllers using one of the ATC aircraft or
perhaps the OpenRadar app, by having a central place to file flight
plans (virtual airline websites could post data through a REST or
XML/HTTP interface per
Hi Pete,
what exactly would be the advantage of this over the New Features forum?
I see you've posted redirects in a couple of topics, so I would like to ask for
your motives. Spreading discussion over yet another spot doesn't make things
better and defenitely won't speed up discussions...
Chee
Thanks for that Martin, I'd never seen OpenRadar before. Been dabbling in Java
recently (the lazy mans attempt at CrossPlatform ;) ) might be something to
have a tinker with!
Thanks again.
Alex
On 22 Jun 2010, at 09:36, Martin Spott wrote:
> Peter Morgan wrote:
>
>> although there are a fe
Peter Morgan wrote:
> although there are a few "atc" client around such as
> 1) ATC
> 2) ATC2
> 3) ATCML - fav
I don't know any of these.
> so is there a way to create an "ATC client" without FG ?
Depends on what you're looking for - "ATC client" is a very vague
description. There's something l
i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD.
OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC).
This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse
engeneering if lisence agreements (e.g. eula) did not take care of such
notices - on this very C
17 matches
Mail list logo
