Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p 3D Turn-Coordinator

2010-06-26 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi Joe, > In case anybody is still working on the C172p-3D: Heiko and I currently maintain it, so we're interested in any bugs/suggestions. > While trying to describe how to fly turns with the c172p 3D-model I > noticed problems with the there used 3D-Turn-Coordinator/Indicator (as > well in the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
On 26 Jun 2010, at 21:00, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Should be fixed now, thanks for reporting. And thanks to Torsten for fixing! James -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the fir

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Jason Cox
Thanks for that. I have just been using a "git clone" and letting it decide on what was the working copy. I think it used v2.0.0-r4 or something. All 3 were done the same, I will change them to "next". only other nice thing would be a cut down of the fgdata so that I got only minimal data and do

Re: [Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> if i try to set the time of day (--timeofday) to anything i get > > fgfs: sunsolver.cxx:60: void fgSunPositionGST(double, double*, double*): > Assertion `sun' failed. Abort > > without the timeofday flightgear starts normally. this is with the > latest git. > > --alex-- > Should be fixed now

[Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread Alex Romosan
if i try to set the time of day (--timeofday) to anything i get fgfs: sunsolver.cxx:60: void fgSunPositionGST(double, double*, double*): Assertion `sun' failed. Abort without the timeofday flightgear starts normally. this is with the latest git. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Durk Talsma
On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:55:10 pm Frederic Bouvier wrote: > I forgot to mention I proposed this change in the CVS era before I had > commit privilege. It's obvious that now I could commit the file with the > correct version number, because I doubt a Linux developer will do it > spontaneously ;-)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> I am away on vacation now so I can't promise when this will be done, > but it may be wise to remove the .in files and their reference in > configure.ac, and remove the target files from .gitignore Done and pushed. Have a great vacation! Torsten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Jari Häkkinen
On 6/26/10 7:36 PM, Alan Teeder wrote: > Is there any need for this to be done by all new cloners before compilation? > It seems to be an unnecessary complication. The reason for having autoconf to replace the version string is that there should only be one place where the version string is set (

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Git merge oops.

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
On 26 Jun 2010, at 17:41, James Turner wrote: > I pushed a wrong branch by accident, which will mess up history in the repo. > Not the end of the world, but Tim can fix it if people avoid committing to fg > (simgear and fgdata are unaffected) until he's rolled back my mistake. > There's a sepa

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Alan Teeder" a écrit : > Is there any need for this to be done by all new cloners before > compilation? > It seems to be an unnecessary complication. > > All GIT users should be currently working with the same version > (2.0.0) in both simgear and flightgear. As and when a new version com

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Alan Teeder
-- From: "Frederic Bouvier" Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 5:57 PM To: "FlightGear developers discussions" Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx >> > The files config.h-msvc8 and config.h-msvc90 are necessary for a >> > windows bu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Official

2010-06-26 Thread Jim Duchek
Use of trademarked logos on liveries may possibly fall under nominative fair use, assuming they are accurate, as depiction of the trademarks are necessary to depict a publicly visible plane. To quote wikipedia with my own comments in brackets, and randomly using American Airlines as the example:

[Flightgear-devel] Git merge oops.

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
I pushed a wrong branch by accident, which will mess up history in the repo. Not the end of the world, but Tim can fix it if people avoid committing to fg (simgear and fgdata are unaffected) until he's rolled back my mistake. There's a separate issue that the build will be broken following my ea

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Frederic Bouvier
> > The files config.h-msvc8 and config.h-msvc90 are necessary for a > > windows build but are now in .gitignore making them inaccessible. > > Natively windows has no method to generate these files from the .in > > files, although this is probably possible by installing Perl, and GNU > > versions

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> these were both pulled down from gitourious today with a git clone > command. Be sure to clone the branch 'next' from FlightGear and SimGear. This is the branch for the latest changes. > > PS. is there a better way of doing things apart from git pull and > getting everything ever committed bein

Re: [Flightgear-devel] problem with git v2.0.0 -- unable to run flightgear

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> > any ideas as miss using flightgear and want to get back to using it > again soon Do you have the latest data from git but not the latest sources from git? Torsten -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> The files config.h-msvc8 and config.h-msvc90 are necessary for a windows > build but are now in .gitignore making them inaccessible. > > Natively windows has no method to generate these files from the .in files, > although this is probably possible by installing Perl, and GNU versions of > auto

[Flightgear-devel] problem with git v2.0.0 -- unable to run flightgear

2010-06-26 Thread Jason Cox
Hi all, finally got it all compiled but now I get lots (about 14600) of the following that ends in a segfault Error building technique: findAttr: could not find attribute bool Error building technique: findAttr: could not find attribute bool Error building technique: findAttr: could not find attri

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2010-06-26 Thread Erik Hofman
Good news, switching to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS solved all git problems for me. No idea why Xandros 4.5 gave me problems but Xandros seemed to have abandoned the desktop market anyhow. For what it's worth, I'm very pleased with Ubuntu so far. Erik ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Martin Spott
Jason Cox wrote: > 1. is simgear-cs & flightgear-cs still required or cn I just use th > gitorious versions? "simgear-cs" is just a customized version of SimGear for "terragear-cs" to run headless if you don't have a $DISPLAY available. It's not required for general operation of FlightGear. Chee