I'll route FSP's domains to 127.0.0.0 in my hosts file, then start clicking...
My hope is that facebook will actually pay heed to my complaints, and look into
the legality of the FSP adverts. That might save us from having to employ
someone to do the same.
Regards,
Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE.
I'm trying to figure out the best way to model the Rheinfall in Switzerland for
an upcoming scenery project.
There is no land cover layer for waterfalls. A fountain-like particulate model
may work but there are problems with creating terrain-like models.
What is the best way to go about this?
On Monday 22 November 2010 14:41:42 Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi guys/gals,
>
> I notice a big step up in frequency of seeing those pesky FSP ads on
> facebook. Sometimes I'm seeing 2 of them on the same page. My response to
> those is to click the little 'X' and respond that its either misleading,
Hi guys/gals,
I notice a big step up in frequency of seeing those pesky FSP ads on facebook.
Sometimes I'm seeing 2 of them on the same page. My response to those is to
click the little 'X' and respond that its either misleading, or click 'other'
and give a quick comment that it may not fully m
On 2010-11-21 12.44, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 21 Nov 2010, at 01:43, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>> I prefer fixing instead of releasing
Fixers and releasers can be different people. Of course, releasers need
to be given the power of steering fixers focus. (Yes I know that people
are working voluntari
On 2010-11-21 18.01, manday wrote:
> Once you tell me what exactly I should file the bug on I will get some
> screenshots to give you a better idea.
There is a bugs page at the wiki,
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Bugs, and an issue tracker at
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/
---
Hi Csaba,
Shouldn't be any problem. I have some tools to fetch upstream fixes and
incorporate these back into my main database (and a streamlined version of
those tools is waiting to be included into the "scripts" subdirectory of
FlightGear / git soon).
Cheers,
Durk
On 22 Nov 2010, at 14:47
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions
> (which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job).
Does it cause any problems if I commit the "obvious" fixes to git? I
have already don
Hi,
Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions
(which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job).
Cheers,
Durk
On 21 Nov 2010, at 23:05, Alasdair wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:01 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:08 +, Alasdair wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi Alasair
> >
> > What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU
> > is
> > still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
> > Dubbo i
Hi Alasdair
Oh Ok I am not sure how that slipped through I will look at it.The best
I can suggest is for you to amend your local copy as I would not think it
will change any time soon in FG.Thanks for the heads up.
And it is nice to know someone else is using Australian traffic.
Cheers
Innis
>
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Alasair
>
> What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU
> is
> still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
> Dubbo in the select airport dialog.
>
> Cheers
> Innis
In QFL.xml, flig
Hi Alasair
What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is
still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
Dubbo in the select airport dialog.
Cheers
Innis
>
> For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I
> have found
13 matches
Mail list logo
