Re: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing

2011-03-07 Thread George Patterson
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Oliver Fels oliver.f...@gmx.net wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: ... Oliver P.S.: Noted the sarkasm? Yes, you spelt sarcasm wrong! :-P -- What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing

2011-03-07 Thread Vivian Meazza
Oliver Vivian Meazza wrote: One final thought. We have been using logos in FG ever since I've been involved - 2004 and probably longer. In that time we have not had a problem. Are we saying that no rights holder has ever noticed it anywhere? I find that a bit improbable; perhaps they

Re: [Flightgear-devel] What causes this error?

2011-03-07 Thread Torsten Dreyer
So, I am wondering: 1) Am I seeing something unrelated, which just by a funny coincidence obscures an error message from the Nasal code that it relevant for me by generating tons of warnings? 2) Am I seeing something related to what I do, e.g. am I using an ill-formed model somewhere

[Flightgear-devel] Modeling Cessna Stationair 206 (2010)

2011-03-07 Thread David Van Mosselbeen
Hi there, I don't see this aircraft modeled somewhere for flightgear. This looks some other amazing aircraft from Cessna and on they website we can get some information about it. I love these aircraft's and i would like to model this version with it's complete console. There isn't many things so

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing

2011-03-07 Thread Oliver Fels
Vivian Meazza wrote: I find that a bit improbable; perhaps they aren't looking or aren't bothered. Of course, I'm inviting disaster to strike us Monday morning. Ah, yes, at night, I am sneaking into my neighbors garden and take photographs of her in her bedroom through the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing

2011-03-07 Thread syd adams
My own thought on the matter . I still don't think it's as big a problem as has been stated here. Erickson Aircrane goes so far as to supply data just for aircraft modellers providing they model it accurately with proper paint schemes and dimensions. To me this suggests that they enjoy having

[Flightgear-devel] Serial Connection is broken in Windows binary

2011-03-07 Thread Roberto Inzerillo
Hi everybody, I'm getting results with Arduino and FGFS, at least in a Linux environment, that's good. But I will just shortly mention there's something broken in the Windows binaries. I have a fully working hardware/software system that let's me feed FGFS with data coming from a serial

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Serial Connection is broken in Windows binary

2011-03-07 Thread ThorstenB
On 07.03.2011 22:49, Roberto Inzerillo wrote: I'm getting results with Arduino and FGFS, at least in a Linux environment, that's good. But I will just shortly mention there's something broken in the Windows binaries. You mentioned using \n as a line separator in an earlier email. One common

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing

2011-03-07 Thread Chris O'Neill
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:36 +0100, Oliver Fels wrote: I am not sure if you really noticed what I was going to say. If we do not respect the rights of trademarks owners (unless somebody slaps us) what would be the motivation for FPS to respect ours? My point, exactly. It's not about what one

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Serial Connection is broken in Windows binary

2011-03-07 Thread Curtis Olson
There is an entirely different code path/implementation for serial IO under windows versus Linux, so it's entirely possible that a problem has crept in for Windows. I don't have a good way to test it here though. Curt. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM, ThorstenB wrote: On 07.03.2011 22:49,