Added missing terrsync make+header files...
commit 0fd7bb8d3f7bcf62230d960a01cafab2a59ddf2e
Author: ThorstenB
Date: Sat Jun 11 23:22:26 2011 +0200
Convert terrasync into a subsystem.
Fixed scenery tile refresh method.
Simgear automake makefiles with libsvn detection.
With MSVC10
-- Build started: Project: fgScripting, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
NasalSys.cxx
NasalSys.cxx(918): error C2039: 'PRESERVE' : is not a member of
'SGPropertyNode'
C:/FlightGear/install/msvc100/SimGear/include\simgear/props/props.hxx(739)
: see declaration of
- Alan Teeder a écrit :
Added missing terrsync make+header files...
commit 0fd7bb8d3f7bcf62230d960a01cafab2a59ddf2e
Author: ThorstenB
Date: Sat Jun 11 23:22:26 2011 +0200
Convert terrasync into a subsystem.
Fixed scenery tile refresh method.
Simgear automake
Syd wrote
I'll have to agree here . There's also some pretty gaudy terrain
textures too , whatever happened to a general vote on commits ?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Can we please have the old airport textures back: the new ones
I wrote:
Syd wrote
I'll have to agree here . There's also some pretty gaudy terrain
textures too , whatever happened to a general vote on commits ?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Can we please have the old airport textures back:
I wrote:
I wrote:
Syd wrote
I'll have to agree here . There's also some pretty gaudy terrain
textures too , whatever happened to a general vote on commits ?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Can we please have the old
Hi all,
just pushed ratings for my vehicles to Git (wow, didn't know I had that many
(uninished) vehicles!
This year I didn't start new aircraft IIRC, I'm now finishing up my existing
ones instead, as I should
have done in the past years...). Anyway, I came across some issues with the
Gijs,
Some comments inline.
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Gijs de Rooy [mailto:gijsr...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 13 June 2011 13:17
To: FlightGear Development list
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rating System Redux
Hi all,
just pushed ratings for my vehicles to Git (wow,
Vivian wrote:
Just how many systems are there – this must be a 4 as well?
So that would become 3 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 14 = early production. Good enough for
me J
My 2nd point wasn't about the Jetman ;)
But yeah, I do think the Cockpit might be a 4 rather than a 5 then. Will wait
for some more
On 13.06.2011 12:16, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
This is with LIBSVN not enabled in SIMGEAR Cmake.
If I do enable LIBSVN it seems to need APR_CONFIG, which I do not
have.
Right, libsvn depends on APR - both needed. Detection of dependencies
should work with automake. But I know nothing about
With MSVC10
-- Build started: Project: fgScripting, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
NasalSys.cxx
NasalSys.cxx(918): error C2039: 'PRESERVE' : is not a member of
'SGPropertyNode'
C:/FlightGear/install/msvc100/SimGear/include\simgear/props/props.hxx(739)
: see
On 12.06.2011 21:20, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Introduce PRESERVE flag to protect properties on sim reset.
Some specific properties need protection and shouldn't be restored to
their
original values on sim-reset.
This commit is buggy. Contest opened ...
m.
What's wrong?
Gijs wrote:
Vivian wrote:
Just how many systems are there - this must be a 4 as well?
So that would become 3 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 14 = early production. Good enough
for me :-)
My 2nd point wasn't about the Jetman ;)
But yeah, I do think the Cockpit might be a 4 rather than a 5 then. Will
wait
Oh - and Syd, which crop texture is offending you in particular?
Vivian
not the crop textures ... the forest1a , b and c . I dont remember who
did the previous terrain textures , but he/they did a great job ...
especially the look of irregular terrain type as it faded in the
distance. Now we
Currently, there are two A320s in fgdata- Fred's A320 and A320-family by
me and Ampere. I propose that the former A320 be removed some time
before release, to prevent confusion, etc.
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's
--
From: ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:29 PM
To: FlightGear devel list flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Introduce PRESERVE flag
With MSVC10
-- Build started: Project:
Yves wrote
Am 13.06.11 18:33, schrieb syd adams:
Oh - and Syd, which crop texture is offending you in particular?
Vivian
not the crop textures ... the forest1a , b and c . I dont remember who
did the previous terrain textures , but he/they did a great job ...
especially the look
But problem solved. Simgear´s Cmake install directory had got reset to its
default instead of when I did a Delete Cache . Consequently when I built
FG itself it still found the old Simgear headers and libraries.
I am re-compiling and will report back if there is still a failure.
Ok,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hi Syd
Your biggest beef is the lack of any kind of absence in discussion about
this textures and realted shaders, and help to improve them.
So please stop to blame my work here in the list when you're not
interested in any kind of contribution
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, ThorstenB wrote:
Ok, thanks. And let us know if the libsvn issue is still there. CMake
worked on Hudson (Linux/Mac) - but we're missing the MSVC build machine
for a few days now. Does the Windows slave just need a reboot - or is
anything broken?
The service on the
Am 13.06.11 19:36, schrieb Gene Buckle:
I've got this sneaking suspicion that 90% of the problems here are caused
by two people, separated by a common language translating engine. :)
g.
Hm, I guess you can say 100 %, at least on my side. Just found to
buckle sideways in a tranlating
--
From: ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 6:30 PM
To: FlightGear devel list flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Compile and Hudson builds
But problem solved. Simgear´s Cmake install directory
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, HB-GRAL wrote:
Am 13.06.11 19:36, schrieb Gene Buckle:
I've got this sneaking suspicion that 90% of the problems here are caused
by two people, separated by a common language translating engine. :)
g.
Hm, I guess you can say 100 %, at least on my side. Just found to
On 13.06.2011 20:23, Alan Teeder wrote:
It looks as if I still have one error with the FG compile .-(
fgGUI.lib(gui_funcs.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
bool __cdecl copyProperties(class SGPropertyNode const *,class
SGPropertyNode *)
Hi,
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now (main menu:
Environment = Scenery). Credit for the idea goes to James - bugs are
mine ;-).
It provides built-in
Currently, there are two A320s in fgdata- Fred's A320 and A320-family
by
me and Ampere. I propose that the former A320 be removed some time
before release, to prevent confusion, etc.
Feel free to remove mine if you think yours is better
Regards,
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bouvier
On Monday, June 13, 2011 06:12:04 AM Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Vivian wrote:
Just how many systems are there – this must be a 4 as well?
So that would become 3 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 14 = early production. Good enough
for me J
My 2nd point wasn't about the Jetman ;)
But yeah, I do think the
On Monday, June 13, 2011 05:16:59 AM Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi all,
snip
I think the alpha-range is rather big, compared to the others. There is an
awfull lot of difference between a total=0 aircraft and a total=8 (eg.
Model=3, FDM=3, Cockpit=0, Systems=2). I don't care if my vehicles end up
low
Wasn't 'blaming' your work , I just don't like the current texture, it
doesn't seem to fit the rest of the terrain textures at all. But that
IS just my point of view , others may like it.
As for the terrain bump mapping , i think it would look much better if
the surface was roughed up a bit on a
29 matches
Mail list logo
