Hi all,
In case someone may have noticed, mpserver07 is down. We lost one of our cable
modems, and the ISP cannot get someone out here until tomorrow.
When we went with a static IP address in 2010, the ISP gave us an additional
modem unit. Now we have two running, and apparently one of them h
Am 21.11.11 22:08, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:55:34 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote in message
> <4eca5856.6060...@sablonier.ch>:
>
>> Hi Gijs
>>
>> I would be very happy with a "reflect" checkbox/property once. Just
>> to remember issue #295 (stalled, why?), this one is still broken with
HB-GRAL wrote:
> Thank you very much for providing this service ! These days I am working
> for a small publication for an organisation. Just found this image here
> to have in the publication:
> http://maptest.fgx.ch/screens/ksfo.png
Oh my, what a crappy Scenery, all the airport boundaries are
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:55:34 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote in message
<4eca5856.6060...@sablonier.ch>:
> Hi Gijs
>
> I would be very happy with a "reflect" checkbox/property once. Just
> to remember issue #295 (stalled, why?), this one is still broken with
> my ati on osx, osg trunk. It is not broken at
"J. Holden" wrote:
> It looks like there are a number of holes in the SRTM-1 data.
One-arcsec SRTM2 is well-known to be pretty 'dirty' and version2_1
doesn't make a big difference in this respect. In most cases you
should be better off using 3 arcsec, even for the U.S.
Cheers,
Martin.
-
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, J. Holden wrote:
> http://www.stattosoftware.com/flightgear/Durango.zip
>
> I have hope as the file size actually went down in this build, but perhaps
> something else went awry.
>
> The only change is remapping "Scrub" to "ShrubCover". Please let me know if
> this works.
>
It looks like there are a number of holes in the SRTM-1 data. I don't know if
GRASS can export HGT files using r.out.binary so I'm not sure if I can fill
nulls, so I'll have to go back and re-generate the scenery using SRTM-3 data.
Cheers
John
--
Roland, thank you for the screenshots!
>From your screenshots it looks to me as if the ShrubCover worked this time
>around as this was the cause of the null-elevation ocean areas in the first
>two builds.
The other elevation errors, do they still drop down to zero elevation as well?
If so, the
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Aircraft shaders are supposed to appear on the list one day, but
> Emillian is currently combining
> most (if not all) of the aircraft-shaders in one file. It's probably
> better to wait on him before we do
> something about aircraft shaders.
Or we def
Spoke too soon. The trees look great, but the frame rate hit makes it
unusable (from 30-35 to 2-4) even with the other shaders disabled.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Gary Carvell wrote:
> Thank you! I haven't had seen trees in FlightGear for ages (can't run
> with shaders). I didn't realize t
Hello Maxime,
I had also noticed more instances of the grey poly with clipper than GPC.
As an experiment, on Saturday, I spent several hours gutting fgfs-construct
down to the bones. Although the grey polys didn't disappear completely, I
got Clipper producing as good results as GPC did.
The are
Updated the merge request:.
Move snow line slider back to the rendering dialog.
Disable shader options with slider on 0 and show a message on how to enable
shaders.
Make vegetation checkbox independant of shaders (sorry Vivian, I did indeed
make a fault!).
Aircraft shaders are supposed to app
Hi Gijs
I would be very happy with a "reflect" checkbox/property once. Just to
remember issue #295 (stalled, why?), this one is still broken with my
ati on osx, osg trunk. It is not broken at all, but it still produce
this renderbin draw errors filling my fgfs log to a huge file running
flight
On 21 Nov 2011, at 13:01, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback/ideas so far! Hope to get some more throughout the
> week.
Just to add my opinion (since this was partly my suggestion)
My key concern is that most people (even developers) don't care about 'material
shaders', so long as
I'm also in favor of this move trees had barely any effect on
framerate here , before being added to shaders.3d clouds are
managable. Water reflection never had much impact (until my last
update) , but i understand that its a work in progress...
Enabling land-mass and transition effects will f
Thanks for the feedback/ideas so far! Hope to get some more throughout the week.
> Vivian wrote:
> This proposal doesn’t seem to address the problem namely that 3d clouds and
> Random
> Vegetation (trees)
require Material Shaders to be checked in the gui
It does, partly. As I said, the 3D clou
I have an application which use FlightGear as a displaying background.
meanwhile, the purpose of the application is to draw something around the
airport showcasing different effects influenced by natural environments.
Now, it is difficult for me to find the entry to start out to do the task
in hu
Am 20.11.11 12:55, schrieb Anders Gidenstam:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, ThorstenB wrote:
>
> Since some effects may be aircraft specific it might be useful to make the
> advanced dialog dynamic - one way would be to add a checkbox for each
> *-effect property found in /sim/rendering/shaders/ .
>
> Pote
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I don't think there is any particularly good reaon for the
> dependency, for either the trees or the clouds. I'm away at the
> moment but will look at uncoupling them later in the week.
Don't forget to pick up your virtual bottle of fine Whisky (note the
spelling) afterw
> In any case, the 3
> frame rate killers here are 3d Clouds, Trees, and AITraffic. Compared to
> these, the effect on frame rate by shaders is trivial.
Not for me. For me, the landmass effect at quality > 3.5 (or 4? - I can't
check without computer) is the killer - with nothing else enabled, it
b
On 20 Nov 2011, at 22:19, "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> I can’t see any reason for the dependency
> between 3d clouds and Material Shaders,
> but Stuart might enlighten us.
I don't think there is any particularly good reaon for the dependency, for
either the trees or the clouds. I'm away at the mom
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 23:03 -0800, J. Holden wrote:
> http://www.stattosoftware.com/flightgear/Durango.zip
>
> I have hope as the file size actually went down in this build, but
> perhaps something else went awry.
>
> The only change is remapping "Scrub" to "ShrubCover". Please let me
> know if t
http://www.stattosoftware.com/flightgear/Durango.zip
I have hope as the file size actually went down in this build, but perhaps
something else went awry.
The only change is remapping "Scrub" to "ShrubCover". Please let me know if
this works.
In other news, this is 3 square degrees of scenery -
23 matches
Mail list logo
