There you go for the French Translation.
==
L'équipe de développement de FlightGear a le plaisir d'annoncer la sortie
de la version 2.6.0 de FlightGear, le simulateur de vol libre et gratuit. Cette
nouvelle version contient de nombreuses et
Should i remind everyone that this all is about open source and GPL v2
data. Some spirit that have already proved it's capacity and functionality.
It's all about data that is contribute by different talented peoples from
all around the world. It's all about little self made parts from each other
t
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:38:59 -0600
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Obviously I need to steer clear of images that show development or testing
> features that are not yet available in the v2.6 release
What about custom scenery?
Joe
Le 15/02/2012 19:38, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
> --
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:30:51 +0100
> From: kreuzritter2000
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fair practice& autorisations
> To:flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne
Sorry, without any offense, I have to disagree in following points.
>>The original author of instruments panel is Alexis Laille
>Absolutely and totally false! The first version, albeit a very simple,
>is my work. Alexis Laille has nothing to do with that!
When he improves/ replace the panel, w
Hello,
>I agree he is the owner of the model, but he is not the owner of the
>FlightGear project.
I would disagree here in one point.
>From my understanding of the law, he is just the owner = copyright-holder of
>the parts he made (basic 3d-model, basic .xmls), but not the parts which had
>be
I would also like to put a call out for screen shots for the v2.6 release.
What I'm looking for is an honest representation of FlightGear v2.6, but
of course shown in the best light/angles/environment possible. I'm ok with
images generated from pre-releases or release candidates. Obviously I nee
ThorstenB wrote:
> Every free, open source project is really driven by active community
> _participation_, [...]
I overly agree with the opinions presented by the two Thorsten's !
Aside from that I'd like to point out that I'm having mixed feelings
concerning the prominent use of the term "comm
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new version contains many exciting new features, enhancements and
> bugfixes. Major improvements from v2.4.0 include reduced AI aircraft
> load times, easier gra
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:38:34 +0100
Jan Mattsson wrote:
> The concept of ownership does not work well with GPL.
What about maintainers?
Who is the official maintainer of a 'placeholder'?
--
Virtualization & Cloud Mana
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> Guys take a look at this in php
> http://flightgear.daffodil.uk.com/index.php
Looks familiar, isn't this your proposal for a re-design of the main
FlightGear site ?
> So what it boils down to is the fact that all of us are working on
> different tangents in php// and alike.
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> Can I make a suggestion;;
>
> To split the sceneryweb into two repositories..
> eg
> fg-www-mapserver
> fg-www-scenemodels
"Scenemodels", the former "FlightGear Scenery Database" and the
FlightGear MapServer had been starting as independent projects. We're
now right in the
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> Actually can I ask some questions..and some feedback.. maybe..
One day I'll probably publish the Apache config as well.
> 1) the server is using mod python and php ?
Yes.
> Also I assume there are a few mod reqrites on the server to make index.psp
> appear as homepage..
The concept of ownership does not work well with GPL.
/J
2012/2/15 kreuzritter2000 :
> I agree he is the owner of the model, but he is not the owner of the
> FlightGear project.
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using
Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2012, 11:00 +0100 schrieb Erik Hofman:
> So Emanuel has every right to dismiss any modifications on *his* model
> and to update git accordingly.
I agree he is the owner of the model, but he is not the owner of the
FlightGear project.
I see the aircraft name DC-3 as a placeho
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> So ive created a pyqt interface GUI, with an embedded "marblemap" map, and
> would like to aquire data about scene models online via ajax.. so I can
> splat on the map.. and being clever with which models are used where etc..
>
> So the "full web interface" is not required
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> Have you considered Smarty templating (am biased as am a developer)
Most of the code which now makes the "Scenemodels" web site had been
written more than seven (!) years before now and, as far as I can tell,
functionality was the foremost obligation, not elegance ;-)
That
Pedro Morgan wrote:
> would it be possible to "dump" the fgs_* tables and made available as a
> tarball...
I'm not too enthusiastic about making DB dumps publicly available, but
as an additional illustration to the table structure here's an example
SQL script to add a model and the corresponding
I intended to say "Spherical *dome* projection example" but my phone knew
better and autocorrected..
/T
On 15.2.2012 15:35 tuomas.kuosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Two things: First, keep us posted of your progress :) I am also working on
simulator stuff at our aviation club, so this kind of st
Hi.
Two things: First, keep us posted of your progress :) I am also working on
simulator stuff at our aviation club, so this kind of stuff is interesting to
follow.
Another thing that comes to my mind is a spherical door projection example I
remember seeing on README.multiscreen (or it was one
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 10:27 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I spent some time last night putting together a proper Port/Industrial
> material definition using the models under Models/Industrial and the
> object masking against the existing urban texture. It looks quite good,
> though due to the la
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Even slightly further (I think both sites are just RSYNC-Mirrors of the
> same master):
>
> ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Everything-0.0-0.6/Base-Packages/
Project archaeology!
Anyone want to try compiling it to see how far we've co
Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:44 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
>> And even further back :)
>> ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Shared/
>
> euh: http://ftp.linux.kiev.ua/pub/fgfs/Everything-0.7/Base-Packages/
Even slightly further (I think both sites are just RSYNC-Mirrors of the
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:44 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:25 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> > Ah found a backup of all base packages (your own repository by any
> > chance?):
> > ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Shared/
>
> And even further back :)
> ftp://ftp.de.flightg
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:25 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Ah found a backup of all base packages (your own repository by any
> chance?):
> ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Shared/
And even further back :)
ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Shared/
Erik
-
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> I'm running "pickaxe" on the GIT repo - will fetch the results in an
> hour or two when I'm getting back from the customer. The GIT history
> dates back to year 2k, I guess,
I spent some time last night putting together a proper Port/Industr
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 10:13 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:57 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> >> Erik Hofman wrote:
> >>
> >> > Correction, there was once. It looks like someone cleaned out the
> >> > Textures directory.
> >>
> >> I hope this wasn't me .
Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:57 +, Martin Spott wrote:
>> Erik Hofman wrote:
>>
>> > Correction, there was once. It looks like someone cleaned out the
>> > Textures directory.
>>
>> I hope this wasn't me I think the change should still be
>> available in the history, th
Started playing with smarty...
https://gitorious.org/~ffs/fg/ffs-sceneryweb
pete
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:57 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> > Correction, there was once. It looks like someone cleaned out the
> > Textures directory.
>
> I hope this wasn't me I think the change should still be
> available in the history, thus reverting the commit shou
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Correction, there was once. It looks like someone cleaned out the
> Textures directory.
I hope this wasn't me I think the change should still be
available in the history, thus reverting the commit should do it.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it
Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:30:37 + (UTC)
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> Emilian Huminiuc wrote:
>>
>> > If we're on the subject of materials*.xml:
>> > 1. could Construction, Industrial, Port be split from Urban/BuiltUpCover
>> > as
>> > they are now in materials-dds.xml?
>>
>>
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 00:12 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
> There should already be an Industrial texture available. I made one way back
> that has been used for a while but was rendered unused when flightgear
> switched to vmap0 only.
Correction, there was once. It looks like someone cleaned out t
Le 15/02/2012 00:58, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Hey Ant,
You cite in your response the write of Clement, but it's wrong !
> The original author of basic XML animation for model is Emmanuel
> Baranger The original author of instruments panel is Alexis Laille
Absolut
34 matches
Mail list logo
