> With Catapult it is less a problem, with answering time
> delay, i mean it should work.
> Catapults features need only to know the "starting position"
> with a more or less value precision: a carrier with 20 km
> speed does 5.6 meter per second => 0.50 1/10 sec => 0.05 1/100 sec
>
> The
Schweet. Details? Are those dedicated instruemtns, or a FG monitor behind a
mask?
Bill
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 8:17 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] 350 Mb movie
There is someone in the DATCOM world working on an aero model DA-40. This
is what it looks like. Is it close to what you are doing? If so, I'll hook
you up with him.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tatsuhiro Nishioka
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 10:43 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] an important growing trend now in
softwareapplications to make them" portable" in the sense th
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee
Duke
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:14 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Prerelease 0.9.11 some
testresults
How about 0.x.y where x and y can be variables and ev
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:52 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Prerelease 0.9.11 some
testresults
I'm just a little surpised that the version numbe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Syd&Sandy
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 3:04 PM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re:
> [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/R22/Models R22.xm
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Durk Talsma
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 5:30 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] The Big Monitor show at FSWeekend,
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> One th
> > I am clearly one that prefers to start with the brakes set and all
> > switches off as that is the way every real flight starts.
>
> (An aside: In my experience, it's rare that the parking brake
> is on when a real light plane is parked, because line staff
> wouldn't be able to move it
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:57 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tunnel for glide slope visualization
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] tunnel for glide slope visualization
>
> Here's a first stab at
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Phil Panelli
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:02 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Glass cockpit and external gauges.
>
> Hi ,
>
> Is there anyone w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Romeo Ahohe
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 2:38 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Compiling SimGear on Cygwin
>
> Hi,
>
> I was able to compile and
> Indeed, I was talking about two 2-D tables, "wrongly"
> guessing that JSBSim would interpolate the data in case,
> let's say, the current slat position is not any of the
> specific slat for which the tables are defined. Such an
> interpolation would be quite accurate, being better the mor
> On the topic of calculating downwash at the tail, and the
> effects thereof, rather than make a four dimensional table it
> might be better to think outside the box and consider
> alternative ways to do what you need.
I agree. That's why I brought it up in the first place, to see if anyon
> Quoting Fabian Grodek
> Now, regarding the 737 sample case, it should be checked
> which flaps-slats combinations are normally possible; it may
> be the case where let's say flaps 20 cannot come with
> retracted slats (if there is a problem with the slats
> deployment you are allowed to u
> I saw that ans it is a bit disturbing. If I understand well
> you take the output from datcom and assign half of those
> numbers to each flap. Except that we suddenly have negative
> flap angles in the datcom.xml (they are positive in datcom.out).
ZOIKS! You are correct. It was caused by
> Jon Replies:
>
> I've been thinking about these issues for some time. I've
> actually considered just guessing. :-) I wonder how much
> data is too much data? It would be great to have this level
> of fidelity modeled.
>
> Jon
>
Don't know if anyone noticed, but the flaps are already
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jon S. Berndt
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 2:49 PM
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Epsilon,alpha_tail and
> independent tail contributions
>
> > >
> > Any chance JSBSim could be expanded to do infinity number of
> > dimensions of tables (if it doesn't do it already)?
> >
> > Bill
>
> We might actually be able to effectively do that, since we
> could have multiple tables defined that create multipliers
> that could be used later.
>
>
>
> Jon Replies:
>
> I've been thinking about these issues for some time. I've
> actually considered just guessing. :-) I wonder how much
> data is too much data? It would be great to have this level
> of fidelity modeled.
>
> Jon
>
>
Any chance JSBSim could be expanded to do infini
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon S.
Berndt
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 12:48 PM
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Epsilon,alpha_tail and independent tail
contributions
Fabian wrote:
Currentl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jon S. Berndt
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 12:51 PM
> To: Flightgear-Devel
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] List message format
>
> Is there a convention we should follow for formatting
> messag
Is there a recently compiled distribution package of the Flight Gear
0.9.pre11 package available, say something built within the last month?
I want to do some model development without having to build the pre11
release myself.
...and, as long as I have you on the line, with the 0.9.11 release i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of AnMaster
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:48 AM
> Why couldn't Datcom be installed in the user's home directory
> like most programs? Or does datcom not support --prefix to
> ./configure? (N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Torsten Dreyer
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:52 AM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datcom+ 2.1 Release annoucement
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> thanks for this
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pablo
Rogina
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:18 AM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datcom+ 2.1 Release annoucement
> 'helping', but he complained about stuff that I just wasn'
y UAV altitude hold controller this morning before
work. I have a plot and a movie of the flightgear replay under today's
entry at this url:
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/UAV/MicroGear1/
Full res movie (so you can read the gauges) is here:
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp
I am happy to annouce the release of of Datcom+ 2.1. This has been a LOT of
work packaging these tools into nice installation packages, for Windows XP
and Windows Vista for point and click people, Cygwin under Windows XP and
Vista for the smells-like-Linux group, and Linux (compiled under Debian).
and.
(Usually when people send me this stuff, they want a DATCOM model and a
FlightGear package).
Thanks for not asking ;-}
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:57 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussi
>
> > I also have doubts that a single fdm can accurately
> reproduce ship and
> > car characteristics - [...]
A true Ship FDM would require sea state simulation, as a carrier is going to
rock in a heavy sea. Landing on a carrier in calm water in the daylight is
easy. It's that Sea State 5,
Okay, now someone needs to refuel behind it. I understand the tanker is
firewalled, and the SR-71 is on the verge of stalling.
Bill
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:02 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Flight Gear being sold on ebay
On 6/14/07, Bill Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DId you report this to EBay? They are usually pretty good about resolving
issues like this.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:50 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Flight G
This message is getting long and probably 99% of you have clicked
delete/next by now, but let me brag on FlightGear now a minute.
First off, let me say CONGRATULATIONS. Not only did you have a successful
first flight, in that you proved that you could engage and override the
autopilot,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ralf Gerlich
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
>
> Hi,
>
> Gene Buckle wrote:
> >>> Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Spott
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 5:01 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
>
> Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Spott
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 4:17 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
>
> Maik Justus wrote:
>
> > Does anyon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Stefan Seifert
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:38 PM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Palmer
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:06 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
Thanks to all for the input... the collaboration of many is what makes FG
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Spott
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:04 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
>
> James,
>
> "James Palmer" wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jon S. Berndt
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:29 PM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Phidot not zero.. And bank
> angle constant...
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Nicol Carstens
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:51 AM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Phidot not zero.. And bank
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Yurik V. Nikiforoff
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 6:44 AM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] An2 problems
>
> В сообщении от 23 Март 2007 15:53 AJ MacLeod
There were some tanker chase videos that were pretty decent. I think they
were Curt's. I have them, if you'd like me to send them to you.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berndt,
Jon S
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:20 AM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.source
> To me , the last JSBSim FG CVS update is right, I can start
> and fly every propeller Aircraft, but the An2 which does not
> take off (not enough power to take off) , it can fly only if
> we launch it from altitude (enough power to fly).
Do the props have pitch to them? Do you have to se
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ron Jensen
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:43 AM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] An2 problems
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 21:54 -0600, Jon S. Berndt wr
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Betka
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 8:48 AM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Better audio for FG
Hello all,
I am new to FG and to the developer list. I sent an earlier e
48 matches
Mail list logo
