> On Thursday 25 April 2013 15:41:54 henri orange wrote:
> > Here is quoted Renk sentence himself:
> > "I hope you have the fairness to ask FredB to remove Rembrandt then as
> > well, because we need to ship the default rendering scheme such that
> > u
Hi, Stefen
> On Thursday 25 April 2013 14:45:05 henri orange wrote:
> > So, your long answer to explain you don't like Rembrandt and you prefer
> > to
> > work on your own system, as just been underlined there by you.
> > Your conclusion is "REMOVE REMB
Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 06:24:41 Renk Thorsten a écrit :
Hello, Renk
> I hope you have the fairness to ask FredB to remove Rembrandt then as well,
> because we need to ship the default rendering scheme such that users
> without good graphics cards (the integrated intels for instance) can use FG
>
Le mercredi 24 avril 2013 06:58:41 Renk Thorsten a écrit :
> It occurred to me yesterday that there seems to be a major misunderstanding
> in the way Atmospheric Light Scattering (ALS) is perceived by different
> people. So in order to avoid future misunderstandings, let me try to
> clarify my side
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 08:58:46, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a écrit :
SNIP
> Thanks for that as well!
>
> For the next release, I'd just have one suggestion: Feature freeze
> for aircraft 2 weeks after feature freeze for core, so that
> aircraft can be tested against what is to become the release
> can
i was naive , when i asked it, on the forum,
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=9972
giving an example coming from an old flightgear version.
The effect was great, however the answers were not promising.
what a pity we have lost it.
2011/3/28 Vivian Meazza
>
> Hell, we can
Argh, which explain i did not find the example, i just remember the effect ,
but did not noticed it was not dynamic.
Sorry for the noise.
I though it was like the livery change, which can be done on the fly.
2011/3/28 Heiko Schulz
> Hi,
>
> >>About: An aircraft flying in the alps reflecting ve
Hi Heiko,
My two cents:
About: An aircraft flying in the alps reflecting very visible the ocean
doesn't look realistic.
Won't it be possible to select the reflection according to the terrain
under, it is done with some particule animations (helicopter), it is
possible to make it with the reflec
That's was my conclusion "a potential misunderstanding here".
Your system is more a simulator dedicated to meteorologist engineer.
To fly within Flightgear we have a lot of ready made aircraft model , we are
not obliged to make the aircraft.
With your local weather system we must build the weathe
Sorry what do you mean with
" (= tick the option box)." ?
however just try to modify the wind kt within the local weather tile gui,
iget nasal error
Cheers
2011/3/21
> > when playing with the Local weather menu, i get the following message
> >
> > Nasal runtime error: setprop() value is not s
Hi,
Git version:
when playing with the Local weather menu, i get the following message
Nasal runtime error: setprop() value is not string or number
at /../data/Nasal/weather_tile_management.nas, line
189
called from: /../data/Nasal/local_weather
henri orange
> Hi, Jano,
>
> I guess i understand my issue, with your patch
> I am working with 3D models whose the XY axis are under the deck. The wake
> 3D object had been replaced by particles effect ( osg model ).
> The consequence is , the lon and lat coordinate given to
jean
> Le 13/02/2011 23:32, henri orange a écrit :
> > Hi, Peter
> >
> > I have done from an old code by Gérard a process which answer to the
> > request.
> > It adjust the altitude of the Carrier, when cruising, according to the
> > visual surface of the water.
Hi, Peter
I have done from an old code by Gérard a process which answer to the
request.
It adjust the altitude of the Carrier, when cruising, according to the
visual surface of the water.
But mistake, it does answer to any condition, including the Tsumani effect
when two tiles are not the same hig
P. (author of the script)
>
>
> On 02/11/2011 05:49 AM, henri orange wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Though, newbe, since i have to maintain some old jsbsim aircraft, my
> understanding ts becoming better.
> Here we do have a c172p which is using nasal only for animation, that scrip
Hi,
Though, newbe, since i have to maintain some old jsbsim aircraft, my
understanding ts becoming better.
Here we do have a c172p which is using nasal only for animation, that scrip
is, to me, right now, useless.
The data compression, rotation and so on, are exposed in the, today,
jsbsim FDM.
Hi, Andreas
Thanks a lot.
However , with the Catalina last updated version:
https://sites.google.com/site/grtuxhangar/home/download/PBY-Catalina.tar.bz2?attredirects=0&d=1
On my system, the error vanished, i don't understand why.
Anyhow your jsbsim fix should solve , or at least reduce the bad
By the way we can play with the gear Z position (gear/unit/z-position) and
the well known terrain nasal script (geodinfo) which expose the terrain
load-resistance.
Though, that feature is only eye candy.
More constructive, to use the specifics friction_factor, rolling_friction
experimented with th
/Aircraft/Boeing314/Nasal/Boeing314.nas,
line 125
called from: /wrklvm/FlightGear/FlightGear_CVS/data/Nasal/globals.nas,
line 100
2011/2/8 Csaba Halász
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:05 PM, henri orange wrote:
> > Will it solved the Boeing314 issue ?
>
> The Boeing314 in GIT d
Will it solved the Boeing314 issue ?
2011/2/8 Torsten Dreyer
> > And that is because of the hardcoded default of 8 fuel tanks. Attached
> > patch makes sure at least the existing tanks are covered by the
> > properties.
> >
> Thanks for spotting this. I was naive enough to think no aircraft ever
Hi,
Not only with the relocation to a mooring position, though that feature is
randomly making the issue.
I cannot explain why, and cannot reproduce twice the same.
I guess the reset sequence/speed is the cause of the issue, scenery ?
model ? fdm ? constant values ?.
The relocation to a mooring
Hello, devel-members,
I am getting ( randomly ) the following messages
Warning: invalid line segment passed to IntersectVisitor::addLineSegment(..)
nan nan nan nan nan nan segment ignored..
Warning: invalid line segment passed to IntersectVisitor::addLineSegment(..)
nan nan nan
Hello,
Beware that version, break the tanks system of Boeing 314
Here the Nasal error
Nasal runtime error: vector index 7 out of bounds (size: 7)
at
/wrklvm/FlightGear/FlightGear_CVS/data/Aircraft/Boeing314/Nasal/Boeing314-fuel.nas,
line 79
called from:
/wrklvm/FlightGear/FlightGear_CVS/data
Hello,
Solved my built issue:
simgear and flightgear seems mismatch some links when built under the same
devel directory (devel-prog-fgCVS/11-0205/flightgear and
,devel-prog-fgCVS/11-0205/simgear) since make flightgear is going on after
the end; building again simgear .
Well,
The la
; On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:45 AM, henri orange wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > built OSG 2.9.10 again , and built Simgear Flightgear again gives the
> same
> > error.
> >
> > Then, since OSG 2.9.11, is available.
> > I have just built osg 2.9.11,
> >
scene »
What is the matter ?
2011/2/5 ThorstenB
> On 05.02.2011 18:54, henri orange wrote:
> > ,
> >
> > I get an error at build
> >
> > screen-dump.cxx:(.text+0x276): undefined reference to
> > `osg::Referenced::signalObserversAndDelete(bool, bool
,
I get an error at build
screen-dump.cxx:(.text+0x276): undefined reference to
`osg::Referenced::signalObserversAndDelete(bool, bool) const'
/usr/local/lib/libsgmisc.a(PathOptions.o): In function
`simgear::makeOptionsFromPath(SGPath const&)':
PathOptions.cxx:(.text+0x49): undefined reference
Hi, Thorsten,
May be i can confirm your feeling.
I was looking at the "old" Catalina official gpl version.
It can start at the right mooring place on water, when there is one, close
to the Airport we want to start from ( for instance KSFO, with Mooring place
at Treasure Island, Pan Am base at
enery/Objects:
SimGear version:
2.2.0
PLIB version: 185
about aircraft models, i do use that link
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=tree;f=Aircraft
click on snapshot
2011/2/5 Erik Hofman
> On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 13:00 +0100, henri orange wrote:
> > Hello, devel-members
Hello, devel-members
Again starting the topic ( was oriented to an other direction )
To resume what i was discovering:
With at least two "official" jsbsim models
747-400
p51d
I am getting a segmentation error at reset.
I don't say these models are wrong, i say there is somewhere, in jsbsim
dur
Hi,
p51d-jsbsim is also crashing with reset.
2011/2/4 henri orange
> Hi Gis,
>
> 2011/2/4 Gijs de Rooy
>
> Hi Henri,
>>
>>
>> > The following file contains the console output , with several runs,
>> done at several Airport.
>>
>> Do
Hi Gis,
2011/2/4 Gijs de Rooy
> Hi Henri,
>
>
> > The following file contains the console output , with several runs, done
> at several Airport.
>
> Do you fly the 747-400 from current Git and also have an updated fgdata? It
> should not show
> some of these errors, like:
>
> XML sound: couldn
Hello devel-member,
Is it just me ?
I am longer getting trouble with jsbsim aircraft and the reset feature
Here an example with the 747-400.
The following file contains the console output , with several runs, done at
several Airport.
You will notice:
sometime i get the segmentation error mess
Hello devel members,
Is it just me ?
With git today, i have lost the panning feature with Helicopter view.
--
Best regards,
Henri, aka Alva
Official grtux hangar maintainer
--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger
does not fix correctly the bug.
2011/1/28 henri orange
> BTW: paraglider is getting the same issue
>
> 2011/1/28 henri orange
>
> Hello devel members,
>>
>> Again, the issue .
>> Not with Aircraft's Engine, since the patch solved it (though getting
>>
BTW: paraglider is getting the same issue
2011/1/28 henri orange
> Hello devel members,
>
> Again, the issue .
> Not with Aircraft's Engine, since the patch solved it (though getting
> others randomly bugs)
> but with Aircraft WITHOUT Engine, like Gliders .
> Teste
Hello devel members,
Again, the issue .
Not with Aircraft's Engine, since the patch solved it (though getting
others randomly bugs)
but with Aircraft WITHOUT Engine, like Gliders .
Tested with sgs233.
Whould be the same issue with others JSBSim gliders
2011/1/25 James Turner
>
> On 25 Jan
Thanks,
I did not noticed the last nigh update.
Will try out it.
2011/1/25 James Turner
>
> On 25 Jan 2011, at 09:46, henri orange wrote:
>
> > It comes up when at reset , for instance c172p.and we get a crash with
> that message: Tried to initialize a non-existent engine!
Hello devel members,
That issue with jsbsim aircraft is back.
It comes up when at reset , for instance c172p.and we get a crash with that
message: Tried to initialize a non-existent engine!
I thought it was solved.
--
Best regards,
Henri, aka Alva
Official grtux hangar maintainer
-
Arrgh, sorry.
I have just Looked at the diff from that old GPL version to the last
"private" version, there is no way to make an easy patch to debug the old
one.
The differences are huge, 3D model, FDM , system files, the other issue is
the diff of license from GPL to CC.
BTW: right now, i wonder
is bombing some petrol,
making fire.
2011/1/24 Anders Gidenstam
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, henri orange wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>>
>> And there is an other strange behavior , with that outdated model.
>> When bombing water, the Aircraft create wildfire, which is idiot.
>
Yes, that model version is outdated, i understood it was Fg 1.9 compatible.
For some reason Gérard didn't continue it.
There is an other version within the grtux hangar which was permanently
improved and updated according to FG git version.
For the record, i am checking, it does suit to FG 2.
Thanks,
And there is an other strange behavior , with that outdated model.
When bombing water, the Aircraft create wildfire, which is idiot.
Gérard, the original author, never gave me any explanation about it.
To me, that feature ( create wildfire ) must be removed.
2011/1/24 Erik Hofman
> On S
Hello Peter,
Your idea is very interesting.
Though my know how is limited, when digging into it, i guess such generic
system should be be any FDM compatible ( i mean yasim and jsbsim).
Since tthe aerotow feature is being part of these FDM.
Those who don't know that feature with jsbsim must fly the
Hello Jon
Do we have flightgear git sync with jsbsim cvs ?
That could explain.
2011/1/1 Jon S. Berndt
> I seem to vaguely recall some issue with resetting (with JSBSim). I had
> thought that the most recent JSBSim code fixed that, though.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
2010/12/31 AJ MacLeod
> Am I alone in seeing flightgear hanging every time after doing a reset? My
> SG/FG/Data are all current, though I haven't built OSG in a while...
>
> AJ
>
> --
>
>
> -
>
No, you are not alone.
I noticed some isues with every JSBSIM models, recent fg git version and
osg d
Hi,
First all, for some reason, i have been, only recently involved in the
Flightgear life, though being an old user of flight simulators.
I don't understand, that talk mailinglist versus forum.
Each one can find easier to use one , or the other according to his
feeling, or according to his res
Hi, Torsten,
Thanks.
This helped me.
Since, with the fdm, the target is to identify the real time status of the
terrain under, with snow-norm or with rain-norm and the target is to
calculate the aircraft behavior against these parameters, If my
understanding , about your idea, is right , it is be
Hi,
I just notice some modifications about the snow and rain norm property,
which seems to be exposed twice.
One place, in the /environment directory , which is new; and an other
place in the /environment/metar directory , which is the old usable place.
I am maintaining a lot of Aircraft, whic
Hi, John,
Thanks for your answer and explanation, though that is somewhere out of my
know how skill.
We can live with such message.
Alva
2010/12/20 John Denker
> On 12/20/2010 05:42 AM, henri orange wrote:
>
> > At FG load, i get a lot of these warn
Hi, project members
At FG load, i get a lot of these warning messages:
TangentSpaceGenerator: unknown primitive mode 9
Is it just me ? is there any possibility to avoid it ?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Alva,
Official grtux hangar maintainer.
-
Though, i have just tested an other airplane without any engine, the glider
sgs233.
The reset is working.
Thus we could conclude , only the aircraft engine loading part is causing
the crash.
Alva
2010/12/14 James Turner
>
> On 14 Dec 2010, at 11:51, henri orange wrote:
>
> > II
Hi, project members
When i try to reset an Aircraft which is flying with a jsbsim fdm ( for
instance the f16)
the program stop and i get an error with the message:
Tried to initialize a non-existent engine!
Aircraft propulsion element has problems in file
/wrklvm/FlightGear/data/Aircr
===quote
2010/12/13 henri orange
> Hi,
> I am the guy who is officially in charge to maintain the grtux hangar.
>
> However that model ( like the others by Gérard which are coming from the
> old cvs repo ) has not been updated for months.
> Right now, none of t
Hi,
I am the guy who is officially in charge to maintain the grtux hangar.
However that model ( like the others by Gérard which are coming from the old
cvs repo ) has not been updated for months.
Right now, none of these models are working since, were done to fly up to
FG 1.9.1.
Some of these
-- Forwarded message --
From: henri orange
Date: 2010/12/1
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft model/cockpit rating
To: FlightGear developers discussions <
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 14:06:11, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a
Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 14:06:11, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a écrit :
> > One example that strikes me is the c172p, though I'm biased as one of the
> > maintainers of the aircraft, and it is rated accurately according to
> > your criteria :)
>
> Compared with, say, the A-10, the F-14b or the Tu-
Hi,
I am getting that warning message ( a lot :( )
Is it a known issue ?
What can be done to avoid it ?
Since, i have a lot of customized, Scenery, Aircraft models, AI models
which could explain the issue, i could be alone to get such Warning.
In such case forget the noise.
Thanks
Alva
commit message for this update
>
>
>
> Vivian
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* henri orange [mailto:hohora...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 26 November 2010 12:43
> *To:* FlightGear developers discussions
> *Subject:* [Flightgear-devel] Nimitz Catapult 4 wrong positi
2010/11/26 Ron Jensen
> On Friday 26 November 2010 08:39:16 henri orange wrote:
> > Hi, devel
> >
> > I am working on models which are jsbsim FDM.
> > My target is to update these models in order to get it, last jsbsim
> version
> > compatible.
> > How
Hi, devel
I am working on models which are jsbsim FDM.
My target is to update these models in order to get it, last jsbsim version
compatible.
How can i build FG with the most recent jsbsim version ?
Since , the FG Gitorious does not include the last jsbsim version (it is not
sync with)
Many than
Hi, navy specialists,
With a recent Git version, the carrier Nimitz catapult number 4 is defined
at
a wrong position, + or - on catapult number 3 .
Was not the case on an earlier FGGIT version.
Is it on purpose ?
Thanks
Alva
62 matches
Mail list logo
