On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:32:54 +0700, Harry wrote in message
aanlktikopbzo1-h7qga8nano68gmb4mm07anm8eb3...@mail.gmail.com:
Memories,
heres an old article on we we were doing in the F28s and airfield
surveys, whilst off topic, it may be of interest.
Hi,
Perhaps some of you have noticed, that some of the aircraft that
come with the standard flightgear package should be changed.
A few examples, we could have a more realistic commercial jet than the
777-200(the FDM is terribly unrealistic), we could have a better
modeled helicopter
we could have a better
modeled helicopter than the BO-105
I am wondering what makes you feel the Bo105 is not as realistic as others. It
has one of the most sophisticated helicopter FDMs in FlightGear which has been
approved by real pilots. Almost every other FDM is based on guessing more
Hi,
Hi,
Perhaps some of you have noticed,
that some of the aircraft that
come with the standard flightgear package should be
changed.
A few examples, we could have a more realistic commercial
jet than the
777-200(the FDM is terribly unrealistic), we could have a
better
Like we couldn't see this coming ;)
As for the 777 , unrealistic according to who ? I'm not against
changing it as one of the default aircraft , there are a lot of other
great choices now , but I do get annoyed with these claims by armchair
pilots who read it somewhere or saw it on
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:49 PM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
Like we couldn't see this coming ;)
As for the 777 , unrealistic according to who ? I'm not against
changing it as one of the default aircraft , there are a lot of other
great choices now , but I do get annoyed with
Two things cross my mind, whilst I know the designers strive to model the
true aerodynamics in the fdm.
1- how many fly these sims on realistic hardware? Would many even go as far
as a set of imitation yoke and pedals?
2- I have spent some time in F28s set up for airport navaid calibration
On Feb 20, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Harry Campigli wrote:
Two things cross my mind, whilst I know the designers strive to model the
true aerodynamics in the fdm.
1- how many fly these sims on realistic hardware? Would many even go as far
as a set of imitation yoke and pedals?
2- I have
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 12:46 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
This is very true. I've not explored the parameters of the 777 in FG,
but if you fly the MD-81 with no passengers, 1200 lbs of fuel and crew
weight, it is extremely different than flying with standard fuel load
and passengers. Enough so
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:29:27 +0100, Erik wrote in message
1298230167.1769.4.camel@Raptor:
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 12:46 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
This is very true. I've not explored the parameters of the 777 in
FG, but if you fly the MD-81 with no passengers, 1200 lbs of fuel
and crew
Memories,
heres an old article on we we were doing in the F28s and airfield surveys,
whilst off topic, it may be of interest.
http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/Flying%20Unit%20navaid%20cal%20article%201990.htm
Item 8 -- (8) good low speed handling and go-around performance from very
low altitude;
11 matches
Mail list logo
