Timothy Moore wrote:
> It would be especially great to base your merges from CVS on the git mirrors
> at
> pigeond.net, as several of us use that.
I know some others use the GIT repo at:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/gitweb.pl
as a reference. Maybe now it's the right time to unify on
On 17 Aug 2008, at 17:22, Martin Spott wrote:
I know some others use the GIT repo at:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/gitweb.pl
as a reference. Maybe now it's the right time to unify on one single
repository,
I'm using git quite happily, it's working well as a way of tracking my
diff
> I know some others use the GIT repo at:
>
> [1]http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/gitweb.pl
>
> as a reference. Maybe now it's the right time to unify on one single
> repository,
>
>I'm using git quite happily, it's working well as a way of tracking my
>different
Hi Pigeon, I hope you're doing well !
Pigeon wrote:
> Having a central git repo would be great. Perhaps we could use the
> one at mapserver.flightgear.org Martin mentioned? Maybe have a
> git.flightgear.org subdomain or something.
Should be feasible, network bandwidth seemingly is not an iss
> Hi Pigeon, I hope you're doing well !
I'm good! :)
> Should be feasible, network bandwidth seemingly is not an issue and the
> machine just got an upgrade to 32 GByte RAM. If people dislike GIT over
> HTTP, then I'd check with our 'sponsor' wether I might set up an
> anonymous GIT daemon. Y
Pigeon wrote:
> Ah, I did not notice it's only providing http access. The last time
> I tried (maybe a year ago) http was much much slower than git's
> protocol. I think git protocol access is definitely a ++ :)
Ok, try it out - I've adjusted the instructions accordingly at:
http://mapserv
Hey Martin,
I guess I'd like to ponder this a little while longer. Should be no problem
to use the existing mapserver name (i.e. not having git.flightgear.org just
yet doesn't impede anyone's development progress), and I guess I'd like to
spend some more time thinking about how official we want t
Hi Curt, Hi Martin,
how git is supported on systems that are not Linux ?
-Fred
- Curtis Olson a écrit :
> Hey Martin,
>
> I guess I'd like to ponder this a little while longer. Should be no
> problem
> to use the existing mapserver name (i.e. not having git.flightgear.org
> just
> yet do
Frederic !
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> how git is supported on systems that are not Linux ?
Depends on whom you ask. I know that GIT support on Windows machines
had been somewhat whacky for quite a while. Primarily GIT had been
relying on some Unix filesystem features that had not been available o
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Hi Curt, Hi Martin,
>
> how git is supported on systems that are not Linux ?
Download Virtual Box from sun (free) and run Linux in a virtual
machine on your mac/windows host.
That said, if anyone is looking for a fun toy ... VirtualBo
the moment I would
like to see, that for releases and official things we keep on CVS( or maybe
SVN?)
Regards
HHS
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mi, 20.8.2008:
> Von: Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT; Was: _Sport Model_
>
Migrating from CVS to SVN would already be a very good thing IMO
-Fred
- "Heiko Schulz" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Could be that this message comes twice due to an error I had from my
> mailprovider...
>
> GIT:
> I did test it some days ago, and it works, but it is not very
> comfortable. Well,
Heiko,
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> The current SVN and CVS-clients are more comfortable. So in the
> moment I would like to see, that for releases and official things we
> keep on CVS( or maybe SVN?)
The (my) GIT mirror doesn't intend to replace Curt's CVS service, at
least not in the near future. Nev
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Migrating from CVS to SVN would already be a very good thing IMO
>
> -Fred
>
Sure enough. But if we take a migration into consideration, we sould
probably go the GIT route. Although I'm not too experienced with git
when it comes to committing things to it, from the gi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> The (my) GIT mirror doesn't intend to replace Curt's CVS service, at
> least not in the near future. Nevertheless I have in mind to propose a
> switchover to GIT once the Windows support has proven to be reliable in
> all modes of operation.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
