n
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bohnert Paul
> Sent: 22 November 2007 03:54
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nimitz operation menu items
>
>
> Hi All,
>
t: 22 November 2007 03:54
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nimitz operation menu items
Hi All,
For now please add the two items I asked for.
I'll work on a new and improved stand alone carrier menu.
It might take some time. I'm learning as I go.
Bes
Hi All,
For now please add the two items I asked for.
I'll work on a new and improved stand alone carrier menu.
It might take some time. I'm learning as I go.
Best Regards,
Paul B
gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On mer 21 novembre 2007, Mike Schuh
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Stuar
On mer 21 novembre 2007, Mike Schuh wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> >1) I think splitting the dialog into two - one for AI/ATC and one for
> >carrier settings would be a good idea. From the user's perspective, they
> >are really two separate functions and there are now suffic
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>1) I think splitting the dialog into two - one for AI/ATC and one for
>carrier settings would be a good idea. From the user's perspective, they
>are really two separate functions and there are now sufficient carrier
>functions to make this worthwhile.
On mer 21 novembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I should have been clearer when I talked about adding buttons for the
> catapult function. I am _not _ suggesting removing the catapult commands
> from the keyboard, but adding the commands to the carrier dialog as well.
>
> I think t
AnMaster wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On mer 21 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >
> >>> Hi Paul,
> >>>
> >>> Providing an easy way to make the Nimitz more MP-compatible
> >>> is an excellent idea. However, I have two comments on the
> >>> implementation:
> >>>
> >>> 1) I
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Markus Zojer wrote:
> Very nice! I am waiting for the mp-nimitz badly ;-)
If you are open to experimental stuff you can already try out one approach
for making a MP-Nimitz:
http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/misc/Carrier_over_MP/
It will not achieve perfect synchronization
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
gerard robin wrote:
> On mer 21 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>> Stuart
>>
>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> Providing an easy way to make the Nimitz more MP-compatible
>>> is an excellent idea. However, I have two comments on the
>>> implementation:
>>>
On mer 21 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Stuart
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Providing an easy way to make the Nimitz more MP-compatible
> > is an excellent idea. However, I have two comments on the
> > implementation:
> >
> > 1) I think splitting the dialog into two - one for AI/ATC and
> > one
Stuart
> Sent: 21 November 2007 10:11
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nimitz operation menu items
>
>
> > Bohnert Paul wrote
> >I propose adding two items to the ATC/AI Options menu.
>
>
> >
> >The fi
Very nice! I am waiting for the mp-nimitz badly ;-)
Just one idea: is it possible to add some knots of headwind to the scene
while overwriting the current metar info, I think that would add some
realism to the scene.
fly on,
markus
Bohnert Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose adding two items t
> Bohnert Paul wrote
>I propose adding two items to the ATC/AI Options menu.
>
>The first one will enable users to set the speed of carrier Nimitz.
>
>The second will set Nimitz speed to 0 and place it at the it's start up
>location. This will allow MP players to >place Nimitz at the same loca
Hi all,
I propose adding two items to the ATC/AI Options menu.
The first one will enable users to set the speed of carrier Nimitz.
The second will set Nimitz speed to 0 and place it at the it's start up
location. This will allow MP players to place Nimitz at the same location
without editing c
14 matches
Mail list logo
