On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:41 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also been using CACHE_ALL since then - not seeing any problems. But
I haven't checked memory consumption. So, what's the status about the
OSG caching
Maybe someone could do some tests when changing the setting
(SGPagedLOD.hxx:56) from CACHE_NONE to CACHE_IMAGES or even to
CACHE_ALL (then recompile/install sg+fg). Would be interesting to know
how this changed loading times, run-time fps and memory consumption.
After 30 minutes more of
I've also been using CACHE_ALL since then - not seeing any problems. But
I haven't checked memory consumption. So, what's the status about the
OSG caching options, should we enable these? Tim?
Me, too. I had a few coredumps with the 4-nvidia-cards, 8 monitors
(multithreading=automatic) setup
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:41 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe someone could do some tests when changing the setting
(SGPagedLOD.hxx:56) from CACHE_NONE to CACHE_IMAGES or even to
CACHE_ALL (then recompile/install sg+fg). Would be interesting to
know
how this changed loading
4 matches
Mail list logo
