Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-05 Thread polly
If opinions seem inexpensive then maybe it's a sign that folks can only hope to contribute in some to what is a truly impressive production. I wonder if the 'signs' addon could be included, it's very reassuring for a beginner. If the signs also included VOR/ADF ID's and frequencies then

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-05 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:45:13 +1000, Pigeon wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ..which version Morphix? > > I'm using their latest 2.6.15 autobuilds basemod... ..uh, I see them as far as Morphix 0.5-pre5 "Himalia"? > > > - fgfs bash completion > > ..huh? Url? :o) > > http:/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-05 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 03:51, Pigeon wrote: > > One deciding factor might be the ease of configuring MP - I > > tested the last 0.9.10 windows prerelease on someone else's box the other > > day and was very impressed at how easy it was to get online. > And that was using what? Is there a wi

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-05 Thread Pigeon
> ..which version Morphix? I'm using their latest 2.6.15 autobuilds basemod... > > - fgfs bash completion > ..huh? Url? :o) http://members.aon.at/mfranz/flightgear/fgfs.bash It's yet another FG goodies by Melchior. > > - fgrun or kfreeflight? > > ..grub!!! FG setup _ca

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-04 Thread Pigeon
> One deciding factor might be the ease of configuring MP - I > tested the last 0.9.10 windows prerelease on someone else's box the other day > and was very impressed at how easy it was to get online. And that was using what? Is there a windows fgfs frontend too? > Might be "nice" indeed,

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-04 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Ralf Gerlich -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 16:14: > I can't say anything about KDE, except that it was using up pretty > much RAM the last time I checked - which must have been about four > years ago ;-) If it's still that way [...] It's not, at least when compared with GNOME. It uses less memory per

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-04 Thread Martin Spott
Pigeon wrote: > At the same time, I probably need more info and testing with ATI > drivers, and I only got nvidias myself... I'll happily test-run the CD on ATI r200 and r300 systems, although I'll be out of town for some days due to holidays in April, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly -

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FG Live progress

2006-04-04 Thread Pigeon
> the biggest problem is the NVIDIA accelerated drivers --- IANAL, but > I am unsure if it's possible to distribute it? maybe there needs to be some > kind of shrink-wrapping done on your side (NV license showing during the > installation etc.) I've already checked, the nvidia's drivers are r