On 10 May 2013, at 20:59, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Alan Teeder wrote:
I think that you a right in assuming that the developers are not interested
in the FDMs.
I posted this a week ago
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
It exposes a serious problem in JSBSim which affects all Datcom users.
Isn't it rather a missing feature than a fault in JSBSim?
The JSBSim documentation and axis names are fairly clear on that the
moments are specified around the yaw, pitch and roll
, 2013 3:41 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] about fdm properties
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
It exposes a serious problem in JSBSim which affects all Datcom users.
Isn't it rather a missing feature than a fault in JSBSim?
The JSBSim documentation
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Alan Teeder wrote:
I think that you a right in assuming that the developers are not interested
in the FDMs.
I posted this a week ago
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=C6C640DA467C4D118C9A794C6A46D433%40AlanPCforum_name=flightgear-devel
Hi the quiet mailing list :)
here are some questions about the fdm properties :
- How come some fdm properties don't have the same meaning, dépending
the fdm used?
i'm thinking of properties in the following property trees:
/accelerations
/orientation
/velocities
/position
if you want some
] about fdm properties
Hi the quiet mailing list :)
here are some questions about the fdm properties :
- How come some fdm properties don't have the same meaning, dépending
the fdm used?
i'm thinking of properties in the following property trees:
/accelerations
/orientation
/velocities
, 2013 7:07 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] about fdm properties
For the sideslip question there is a well established sign convention.
JSBSim at least should follow that exactly as it mechanises the equations of
motion that are in use industry wide
7 matches
Mail list logo
