On Thursday 05 January 2006 23:44, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 21:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
I haven't firmly
decided yet, but I'm considering starting to tackle airway following
code, which is in a way quite similar to the ground network.
Now that would be amazing. No
On Friday 06 January 2006 00:38, Dave Culp wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 04:46 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Also, who ever is developing and working on the MP and AI code:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:37 +, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 22:46, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with
AI traffic, but that these systems should be integrated has
On Thursday 05 January 2006 14:55, Martin Spott wrote:
In other words (with a not that negative touch) this would say: We'd
appreciate if ATC/AI developers would keep such a scenario in mind when
they plan changes to this stuff.
You can't doubt that voice ATC is reality, not only in real life
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic, but
that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending the
AIModels code, this would naturally
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 23:32 schrieb Martin Spott:
To me it's obvious why MP and AI are partially going to be merged some
day, because both are 'exterior' sources of aircraft movement from the
FlightGear users' point of view. If you think of integrating ATC with
AI as well, then please
On Thursday 05 January 2006 21:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
I haven't firmly
decided yet, but I'm considering starting to tackle airway following code,
which is in a way quite similar to the ground network.
Now that would be amazing. No other desktop sim has AI flying realistic
flightplans along
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic, but
that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending the
AIModels code,
On Thursday 05 January 2006 04:46 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Also, who ever is developing and working on the MP and AI code:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Also, who ever is developing and working on the MP and AI code:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
10 matches
Mail list logo
