I was confused, by my git SVN import of the OSG source tree, about
what commits are in 2.8.3. I'll check in a correction soon.
Tim
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> - "Bertrand Coconnier" a écrit :
>
>> 2011/2/15 Tim Moore :
>> > I've checked in fixes for this chan
> By the way, I committed the changes to releases/2.2.0 and then merged that
> branch into next. This is the way fixes should move between the two branches.
> Please don't commit a fix to next and then cherry-pick it to the release
> branch. It is very messy to have the same change committed on
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
>
> Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
>
> I find it ridiculous and a bit immature how Oliver people whine about
> a simple logo.
It is neither ri
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>> By the way, I committed the changes to releases/2.2.0 and then merged that
>> branch into next. This is the way fixes should move between the two
>> branches. Please don't commit a fix to next and then cherry-pick it to the
>> release branch. It i
At Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:48:58 +0100
Csaba Halász wrote:
> I have noticed that after about an hour of hanging around at KSFO in
> an ufo on MP, FG's memory went steadily up and eventually reached
> 2.7GiB. Similarly, during the TGA event at the weekend, memory usage
> was above 2GiB by the end of t
My patch may not work for OSG >=2.9 but the fact is that
_readerWriterOptions is also needed for SimGear to compile with OSG 2.8.1.
Cheers,
Bertrand
Le 16 févr. 2011 02:53, "Frederic Bouvier" a écrit :
- "Bertrand Coconnier" a écrit :
> 2011/2/15 Tim Moore :
> > I've checked in fixes fo
PodaVhone issue:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=56&can=1&q=vodaphone
Tips:
#1 don't mention the "brand" name as you are are aware of it and thus
intentional.. (or patents)
Sorry, but I have worked in this area and they are out to kill as interest
is held...
Flightgear
Stuart Buchanan
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
> >
> > Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
> >
> > I find it ridiculous and a bit immature how Oliver people whine abou
On 2/15/2011 8:27 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:50:36 -0800, Jack wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
>>
>> Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
>>
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> This is ridiculous. We have this discussion every so often, when we are not
> arguing over FlightPro Sim. Do we have to change every airliner model in the
> inventory? Of course we don't. Use the bloody thing.
Red Bull is known to be very restrictive sensitive when it com
I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
trademarked items ... have you browsed through our aircraft? We have
liveries from just about every airline imaginable, past and present.
What I don't like
Re: Red Bull. One could ask for forgiveness rather than permission. But,
another approach might be to go directly to Red Bull for permission to use
their trademark in return for free advertising for them. I don't know how
several RC aircraft makers 'solved' this issue. There are several RC
aircraf
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> This is ridiculous. We have this discussion every so often, when we are not
> arguing over FlightPro Sim. Do we have to change every airliner model in the
> inventory? Of course we don't. Use the bloody thing. And if ever anyone
> complains sa
Hi Curt,
At the risk of being a case of "if the hat fits"
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
> their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
> trademarked items ... have you brow
Stuart Buchanan
>
> Hi Curt,
>
> At the risk of being a case of "if the hat fits"
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
> > their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
> >
I was browsing the flightgear wiki pages on doing model animations.
Everything is written from the perspective of a single model with named
parts and the animations refer to the part names.
What I have here is two version of the same model as separate 3ds files. I
realize it's a crude hack, but
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> I was browsing the flightgear wiki pages on doing model animations.
> Everything is written from the perspective of a single model with named
> parts and the animations refer to the part names.
> What I have here is two version of the same m
On 15.02.2011 13:41, Tim Moore wrote:
> I've checked in fixes for this change in osgDB:DatabasePager to the
> SimGear and FlightGear next and releases/2.2.0 branches.
Still doesn't compile with OSG <= 2.8.5. We also need the patch that
Bertrand sent yesterday, i.e. the "#ifdef" logic for the
"_
OK, I see that merely removing the 2.8.3 case from my conditional,
which I checked in a couple of hours ago, isn't correct. I'll have
another go.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:10 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> On 15.02.2011 13:41, Tim Moore wrote:
>> I've checked in fixes for this change in osgDB:DatabasePag
Thanks Gary,
Worked perfectly ... turns out I don't need to specify a global model ... I
can just load submodels and give them names and use them. A global
offset/rotation does work.
Now I'm having trouble with that whole ambient/diffuse thing and my model
surfaces that aren't pointed at the lig
Hi,
>
> Curt has it right. Get real guys. No one is going to sue a
> non-existent
> organization with no assets. The worst they will do is tell
> us to desist.
> Which we will do of course.
>
> If you want to remove or alter almost every livery in our
> inventory, fork
> the data in git and go r
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:05:41 + (GMT), Heiko wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Curt has it right. Get real guys. No one is going to sue a
> > non-existent
> > organization with no assets. The worst they will do is tell
> > us to desist.
> > Which
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andreas Gaeb wrote:
> Hi Henri,
>
> I think I found the error, it was in JSBSim's FGForce class. I've
> proposed a fix on the JSBSim-devel mailing list.
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas
Hi Andreas,
had a look at the patch you suggested on the JSBSim list
(http:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> had a look at the patch you suggested on the JSBSim list
> (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=jsbsim-devel&message_id=4D5436B3.10606%40web.de&counter=1).
>
> However, I looking at the code it seems calling these "InitMatrix" in
> the FGForce constructor s
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Thanks Gary,
> Worked perfectly ... turns out I don't need to specify a global model ... I
> can just load submodels and give them names and use them. A global
> offset/rotation does work.
> Now I'm having trouble with that whole ambient/diff
Hi Gary,
I think I've beat the model pretty much into submission now. I was able to
export as .ac, but the scaling was off by 2.54 ... hmmm where have I seen
that number before? I figured out how to scale and reposition the model in
blender :-) Then all the faces were
totally faceted so I fig
Hey everyone,
Based on my (brief) reading of some United States statutes, I would suggest we
can continue using these trademarks until asked not to do so. I don't think
this will bring forth a lawsuit, most likely a cease and desist action which is
easily complied with, if it is on trademark gr
To throw something into the mix here:
I've actually got experience of dealing with RedBull regarding the use of their
logos and IP in Flight Simulation.
Several years ago I contacted them for an old Payware project and they were
most supportive, provided an email stating that as long as nowher
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> I think I've beat the model pretty much into submission now. I was able to
> export as .ac, but the scaling was off by 2.54 ... hmmm where have I seen
> that number before? I figured out how to scale and reposition the model in
>
Hi,
>To throw something into the mix here: >I've actually got experience of dealing
>with RedBull regarding the use of their logos and IP >in Flight Simulation.
>Several years ago I contacted them for an old Payware project and they were
>most >supportive, provided an email stating that as lon
Folks,
Is there a general guideline or policy that would cover non standard
instrument panels for sim applications?
I recently modified the distro 777-300 model to suit my sim hardware, to do
that I make a special panel layout to fit one camera view, Its one of 2
different views on a dual screen
Hi,
Technically, all these logos are under trademark:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/737-100/Models/Liveries/731CA.png;h=43cfc5a15abb392519e1f95d34951d410d3c3c80;hb=HEAD
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/737-100/Models/Liveries/731co
Ok I tried to keep out of it ...;)
The issue isn't your work , it's the concern over the Red Bull livery
I haven't yet figured out why it's so important to include ,
there must be many other paint schemes that could be added instead.
I did 777 British Airways livery with some trepidation , and
Jack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
Jack, thanks for caring and removing the livery from the package. As I said
you can still provide it separately from your web site. This does not make it
legal but moves FlightGear out of the focus.
> I find it
so what happened to fgfs 2.2? can we get a Linux installer as well?
as it's not yet released, what about changing licence to something alike CC
etc.(see the forum) Android uses Apache licence...I didn't read those but am
sure that there's one to keep off jerks.
i doubt...have a look at FSX. Even commercial products alike xtraffic etc use
such liveries.
--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Jack Mermod wrote:
From: Jack Mermod
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] .."IP" and litigation risks, was: AH-1 Merge
Request
To: "Devel List"
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011, 3:45
36 matches
Mail list logo
