NP problem, after more than 15 years, it is still a pleasure to contribute to
fltk :-)
> It'working fine for me.
> Thanks for the correction.
___
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
Le 05/04/2012 17:08, Albrecht Schlosser a écrit :
> This has been addressed differently now by adding an accessor method
> (svn r 9325, by Fabien), and the other problem is now fixed as well,
> as suggested by your patch (r 9327). Please test if this is okay now.
> It all worked well for me with V
On 26.03.2012 19:46, David FLEURY wrote:
> Le 26/03/2012 17:28, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) a écrit :
>>> > I also believe that we already had a similar problem. This one can
>>> > be fixed easily with "friend class Fl_X;" in Fl_Widget.H, like this
>>> > patch:
>>> >
>>> > Index: FL/Fl_Widge
On 26.03.2012 17:28, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>
>> I also believe that we already had a similar problem. This one can
>> be fixed easily with "friend class Fl_X;" in Fl_Widget.H, like this
>> patch:
>>
>> Index: FL/Fl_Widget.H
>>
Le 26/03/2012 17:28, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) a écrit :
>> > I also believe that we already had a similar problem. This one can
>> > be fixed easily with "friend class Fl_X;" in Fl_Widget.H, like this
>> > patch:
>> >
>> > Index: FL/Fl_Widget.H
>> > ==
> I also believe that we already had a similar problem. This one can
> be fixed easily with "friend class Fl_X;" in Fl_Widget.H, like this
> patch:
>
> Index: FL/Fl_Widget.H
> ===
> --- FL/Fl_Widget.H (revision 9300)
> +++ FL/Fl
> All,
>
> One thing I did just notice is that the r9300/r9301 fltk3 build is somewhat=
> borked.
>
> A few days ago, if I built the "test1" folder, to verify that the fltk-1 co=
> mpatibility was working, I was getting 50 out of 70 tests building OK.
>
> As of this morning, with r9301 checked out
All,
One thing I did just notice is that the r9300/r9301 fltk3 build is somewhat
borked.
A few days ago, if I built the "test1" folder, to verify that the fltk-1
compatibility was working, I was getting 50 out of 70 tests building OK.
As of this morning, with r9301 checked out, I get 2 out of
On 25.03.2012 22:46, Ian MacArthur wrote:
>
> On 25 Mar 2012, at 06:50, David FLEURY wrote:
>>
>> Hum, the code is from Fl_win32.cxx, the function is :
>> Fl_X* Fl_X::make(Fl_Window* w) and try to access a protected enum.
>>
>> Under VS, I don't see any link between Fl_X and Fl_Widget.
>>
>> The fi
On 25 Mar 2012, at 06:50, David FLEURY wrote:
>
> Hum, the code is from Fl_win32.cxx, the function is :
> Fl_X* Fl_X::make(Fl_Window* w) and try to access a protected enum.
>
> Under VS, I don't see any link between Fl_X and Fl_Widget.
>
> The filename is Fl_win32.cxx this is probably why it no
2012/3/25 Greg Ercolano :
> On 03/24/12 14:39, Nikita Egorov wrote:
>> I think VS applies 'static' attribute only to first variable from list
>> ('no_fullscreen_x').
>
> I'm not sure that's the problem, at least not as a general
> case with 'static'. Though perhaps the DLL context is
>> First, it is
>> src\Fl_win32.cxx(1318[and 1629]): error C2248: 'FULLSCREEN' : cannot
>> access protected enumerator declared in class 'Fl_Widget'
>
> OK - that's presumably what the patch was changing in Fl_Wideget.H, then, by
> changing the visibility of the enumerated values - though I can
On 03/24/12 14:39, Nikita Egorov wrote:
> I think VS applies 'static' attribute only to first variable from list
> ('no_fullscreen_x').
I'm not sure that's the problem, at least not as a general
case with 'static'. Though perhaps the DLL context is complicating
things.
On 03/24/12 16:41, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 03/24/12 14:39, Nikita Egorov wrote:
>> I think VS applies 'static' attribute only to first variable from list
>> ('no_fullscreen_x').
>
> I'm not sure that's the problem, at least not as a general
> case with 'static'. Though perhaps the DL
Hi Nikita,
On 24 Mar 2012, at 21:39, Nikita Egorov wrote:
>> I don't have VS2010, so can you tell us what errors you were getting?
>>
>> And what the last version that did work OK was?
>>
>>
>> Looking at the patch to Fl_Window.H, for example, it's not even obvious to
>> me that it is actual
> I don't have VS2010, so can you tell us what errors you were getting?
>
> And what the last version that did work OK was?
>
>
> Looking at the patch to Fl_Window.H, for example, it's not even obvious to me
> that it is actually changing anything, in so far as I understand the C++
> syntax anywa
On 24 Mar 2012, at 19:25, David FLEURY wrote:
>
> the branch 1.3.x r 9300 do not compile under windows VS2010.
>
> Here the patch for locating theses issues.
> My patch is only here to compile my own version.
I don't have VS2010, so can you tell us what errors you were getting?
And what the la
Hi,
the branch 1.3.x r 9300 do not compile under windows VS2010.
Here the patch for locating theses issues.
My patch is only here to compile my own version.
Regards,
David
Index: Fl_Widget.H
===
--- Fl_Widget.H (revision 9300)
+++
18 matches
Mail list logo
