[fltk.development] When FLTK 1.3 is going to be released?

2010-04-29 Thread Harut Grigoryan
Hello, Our team is developing a product that uses the toolkit intensively. At certain point we will need UTF-8 support there. So, it's crucial for us to get an estimate on when FLTK 1.3 is going to be released. Would highly appreciate your answers. Thanks. _

Re: [fltk.development] When FLTK 1.3 is going to be released?

2010-04-29 Thread Duncan Gibson
> Our team is developing a product that uses the toolkit intensively. > At certain point we will need UTF-8 support there. So, it's crucial > for us to get an estimate on when FLTK 1.3 is going to be released. Probably not until the 11 Open Feature Requests and 31 Open Bugs in the development ver

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2351: test files fixups (ported version 2.0 to version 2.0) ; -)

2010-04-29 Thread rainbow sally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2351 Version: 2.0-feature I should add that I fixed about a dozen of the test files but have still not gotten the themes working because they are missing parts that can't

Re: [fltk.development] When FLTK 1.3 is going to be released?

2010-04-29 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
> Our team is developing a product that uses the toolkit > intensively. At certain point we will need UTF-8 support > there. So, it's crucial for us to get an estimate on when > FLTK 1.3 is going to be released. Hard to say - we are trying to clear the remaining STR's against it, but resources

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2356: Non-Explosive Fluid

2010-04-29 Thread rainbow sally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2356 Version: 2.0-feature This is a list of the twenty or so files that didn't compile at all in the original version 2.x test directory and which were fixed and modified

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2351: test files fixups (ported version 2.0 to version 2.0) ; -)

2010-04-29 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2351 Version: 2.0-feature Note that FLTK 2 was never released, it's a dev version that was far along, but was still in dev when it went dormant. So expect to find things l

[fltk.development] Coding conventions?!

2010-04-29 Thread Emil Cataranciuc
Hello! Do you guys have some coding conventions for FLTK project? I am looking at the code and it is all messed up. At least when editing in vim indentation is bad, but of course that is not the biggest problem. If there is, then every time somebody submits a new subversion it must be checked (t

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2357: More Fluid, Anyone? (double-click fix and NOW! Proper inlined image code)

2010-04-29 Thread rainbow sally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2357 Version: 2.0-feature Here's the preliminary (still testing) version of Fluid_Image.cxx that will output the proper syntax for a SharedImage that's inlined. That is

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2357: More Fluid, Anyone? (double-click fix and NOW! Proper inlined image code)

2010-04-29 Thread rainbow sally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2357 Version: 2.0-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2357 Version: 2.0-feature Fluid_Image-syntax-fixup.tar.gz Description: Binary data

Re: [fltk.development] Coding conventions?!

2010-04-29 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 29.04.2010, at 20:28, Emil Cataranciuc wrote: > Do you guys have some coding conventions for FLTK project? > I am looking at the code and it is all messed up. At least when editing in > vim indentation is bad, but of course that is not the biggest problem. The coding standards for 1.3 are he

Re: [fltk.development] Coding conventions?!

2010-04-29 Thread Greg Ercolano
Emil Cataranciuc wrote: > Hello! > Do you guys have some coding conventions for FLTK project? > I am looking at the code and it is all messed up. At least when editing in > vim indentation is bad, but of course that is not the biggest problem. I'd suggest reporting indent issues with an S