Thanks for the test, it seems that we have lots of work to optimize cairo
performance. I thought it was just hundreds of times slower in curve cases.
Jim
> --20cf300513cc6ba49104bdd686c6
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I finally got around to writing a little test program for FLTK gr
If this issue has already been discussed, please excuse me. I had
done some searches in FLTK forum but nothing is found (the search
function seems broken, doesn't it?)
In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
of devpaks from "community devpaks" site. When I tried to i
On 20.04.2012, at 19:05, STF wrote:
> If this issue has already been discussed, please excuse me. I had
> done some searches in FLTK forum but nothing is found (the search
> function seems broken, doesn't it?)
>
> In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
> of devpaks
STF schrieb:
> In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
> of devpaks from "community devpaks" site. When I tried to install
> version 1.1.9, I got the error message that "The following files were
> not downloaded due to errors: Could not start transferring remote
> file
On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:30, james wrote:
> Thanks for the test, it seems that we have lots of work to optimize cairo
> performance. I thought it was just hundreds of times slower in curve cases.
Yes - these numbers are really useful. I can't even find the (very crude)
measurements I made way bac
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Ian MacArthur wrote:
>
> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:30, james wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the test, it seems that we have lots of work to optimize
> cairo performance. I thought it was just hundreds of times slower in curve
> cases.
>
> Yes - these numbers are really usefu
