On Wednesday, August 11, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
Actually I take that back, about it sounding good.. It seems like
adding a MIDI mode which requires manual assignment of that value,
without proper SYSEX handling, will likely lead to many MIDI songs not
working properly
Please, back your
On Thursday, August 12, 2010, Jim Henry wrote:
Again I am just making an observation regarding something I don't do so
I could be completely off base. Is one of the uses of FluidSynth
intended to be a MIDI file player that allows the use of sound fonts? If
so, I think some of those who want to
Forwarded to the list, sorry.
- Hat den folgenden Inhalt empfangen -
Absender: Bernd Casper
Empfänger: Elimar Green
Zeit: 2010-08-12, 10:12:51
Betreff: Re: Re: MIDI Bank Select proposal (was Re: [fluid-dev] Re: Son of
ticket#65)
Hi Elimar,
yes, I do.
My opinion: I can
Again I am just making an observation regarding something I don't do so
I could be completely off base. Is one of the uses of FluidSynth
intended to be a MIDI file player that allows the use of sound fonts? If
so, I think some of those who want to use it that way are likely to have
little
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
pedro.lopez.cabanil...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that we can leave the SYSEX stuff for a future release, avoiding the
risk of spend too much time implementing and testing this feature. In
addition to your code, I've included similar
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
pedro.lopez.cabanil...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that we can leave the SYSEX stuff for a future release, avoiding
the risk of spend too much time implementing and testing this feature.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
pedro.lopez.cabanil...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good. Does it make sense to have separate midi.bank-select and
a midi.mode setting though? Why not just make it midi.mode and then
we can add additional functionality on to it in the future?
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
It seems simple enough to revert the behavior to 1.0.9 functionality.
This should work fine in most cases, as far as the whole MSB is
actually LSB when only the MSB is received.
I can understand David wanting to release ASAP, since he has been
2010-08-10 08:01, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev:
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
It seems simple enough to revert the behavior to 1.0.9 functionality.
This should work fine in most cases, as far as the whole MSB is
actually LSB when only the MSB is received.
I can understand
On 8/9/2010 10:34 PM, Elimar Green wrote:
... if only the
MSB is received prior to a Program Change, then it should be
interpreted as LSB. If both MSB and LSB are received, they should
combine to select the bank (once the Program Change is received) as
MSB * 128 + LSB.
I don't do the kind of
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Jim Henry wrote:
On 8/9/2010 10:34 PM, Elimar Green wrote:
... if only the
MSB is received prior to a Program Change, then it should be
interpreted as LSB. If both MSB and LSB are received, they should
combine to select the bank (once the Program Change is
2010-08-08 23:42, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev:
How about we release 1.1.2 now, list this as a known issue, and release
1.1.3 as soon as this is agreed, fixed and finished, with Sysexes,
settings, and so on?
If that then takes just a week - then we can release 1.1.3 just a week
after 1.1.2.
On Monday, August 9, 2010, David Henningsson wrote:
2010-08-08 23:42, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev:
On Sunday, August 8, 2010, David Henningsson wrote:
SF2 (SoundFont) files (like GeneralUser, FluidR3,...) have bank
numbers 127 for melodic sounds and 128 for Drum kits, as
recommended by
On Monday, August 9, 2010, I wrote:
XG defaults and recommends channel #10 as the drum channel. Other channels
may be used as drum channels when CC#32=127 is received on any channel.
What I'm proposing is to fix *NOW* the broken behavior that is plaguing
FluidSynth-1.1.x converting any
It seems simple enough to revert the behavior to 1.0.9 functionality.
This should work fine in most cases, as far as the whole MSB is
actually LSB when only the MSB is received.
I can understand David wanting to release ASAP, since he has been
waiting for a while to do so. But I think the
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, Elimar Green elimargr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Elimar Green elimargr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MIDI Bank Select proposal (was Re: [fluid-dev] Re: Son of ticket
#65)
To: jimmy wg20...@yahoo.com
Cc: fluid-dev@nongnu.org
Date: Saturday, August 7, 2010, 9:51 AM
This was all basically implemented at one point in FluidSynth with a
settings option and detection of SYSEX MIDI mode change messages,
which would modify the current settings value dynamically. It was
removed because it was deemed incomplete (as far as all the additional
functionality which comes
On Saturday, August 7, 2010, S. Christian Collins wrote:
Another option, rather than try to guess what bank select mode to use
would be to default to the GS standard, but have an option to use XG
mode--this could even be a switch added to Qsynth easily enough for us
GUI folks.
Defaulting to
On Sunday, August 8, 2010, David Henningsson wrote:
SF2 (SoundFont) files (like GeneralUser, FluidR3,...) have bank numbers
127 for melodic sounds and 128 for Drum kits, as recommended by the
SoundFont specification [5]. It is necessary to map the MIDI Bank
Select numbers to the SF2 bank
On Saturday, August 7, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
This was all basically implemented at one point in FluidSynth with a
settings option and detection of SYSEX MIDI mode change messages,
which would modify the current settings value dynamically. It was
removed because it was deemed incomplete
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:52:14 +0200
From: Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas pedro.lopez.cabanil...@gmail.com
On Friday, August 6, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
I want to remark the above quotation from the SF2
specification. SF2 bank
numbers for melodic channels are numbers in the
range 0 to 127,
On Monday, August 2, 2010, Elimar Green wrote:
Its been a while since the topic of MIDI bank selection was discussed,
so I'm frustratingly in the dark again about it. From what I read a
bank/program change is sent as such:
Bank MSB (CC #0)
Bank LSB (CC #32)
Program change
So in that case
2010-08-03 22:48, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev:
[Sorry, this is a bit long...]
I'm glad you took the time to sort it out!
MIDI Bank Select messages are Control Change #0 (MSB) and CC#32 (LSB) [4]. Up
to FS-1.0.9, the behavior was that when a CC#0 message was received, the
value was used as
by a program change?
Regards
Bernd.
- Folgende Nachricht wurde empfangen -
Absender: Elimar Green
Empfänger: S. Christian Collins
Zeit: 2010-08-02, 04:00:28
Betreff: Re: [fluid-dev] Re: Son of ticket #65
Its been a while since the topic of MIDI bank selection was discussed,
so I'm
mailto:elimargr...@gmail.com
*Empfänger:* S. Christian Collins mailto:s.chriscoll...@gmail.com
*Zeit:* 2010-08-02, 04:00:28
*Betreff:* Re: [fluid-dev] Re: Son of ticket #65
Its been a while since the topic of MIDI bank selection was discussed,
so I'm frustratingly in the dark again
Well if a default behavior has to be honored, wouldn't supporting the GS
standard of bank switching be preferable to the current implementation?
From what I've read, instead of selecting a patch from bank 1,
FluidSynth is selecting from the percussion banks instead. Isn't this
what channel
26 matches
Mail list logo
