Now that Michael has set up repositories to which patches can be submitted, it
would be good for the project to have a few coding standards enforced for the
contributions.
I would like to see an "all spaces, no tabs" standard. The handful of files
in the current codebase which I looked at all
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Karl Robillard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to see an "all spaces, no tabs" standard.
And I would like to see an "all tabs, no spaces" standard. Maintain
your own fork if you must, but don't try to impose spacist
wrongheadedness on those of us who kn
Hi,
Karl Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that Michael has set up repositories to which patches can be submitted,
> it
> would be good for the project to have a few coding standards enforced for the
> contributions.
I think the only standard is "keep the same spirit of what is alre
On Friday 20 June 2008 01:30:25 pm Steve Folta wrote:
> As you note, the current codebase is neither spacist (it has tabs) nor
> tabbist (it only looks right at a particular tab-width setting) in
> style. Although I'm a hardcore tabbist, I think we should all just
> put up with it as it is. I don
On Jun 20, 2008, at 8:25 PM, Karl Robillard wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2008 01:30:25 pm Steve Folta wrote:
As you note, the current codebase is neither spacist (it has tabs)
nor
tabbist (it only looks right at a particular tab-width setting) in
style. Although I'm a hardcore tabbist, I think w
Set your tabs stops every eight columns and the source will be
aligned properly.
I like the tabs in the source because I can move around indented
lines faster (and the file is a few bytes shorter). I also like
braces lined up like this
if (foo)
{
bar();
}
which would mean a tab
What do you use a teletype for?
John
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:45 -0700, Ian Piumarta wrote:
> Set your tabs stops every eight columns and the source will be
> aligned properly.
>
> I like the tabs in the source because I can move around indented
> lines faster (and the file is a few bytes sh
Am 22.06.2008 um 11:41 schrieb John Leuner:
What do you use a teletype for?
John
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletype
SCNR,
- Bert -
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:45 -0700, Ian Piumarta wrote:
Set your tabs stops every eight columns and the source will be
aligned properly.
I like the tabs
Ah, "space wars" and "brace wars" rise again!
I'd like to propose that no "standard" be imposed...until a beautifier (text
filter) has been created to implement such a norm. After which, everyone
can peer at the code through their own rose-colored beautifiers.
;-)
Cheers,
--ken ritchie (atlanta)
On Jun 22, 2008, at 2:41 AM, John Leuner wrote:
What do you use a teletype for?
Backing up my sources to punched tape.
Cheers,
Ian
PS: if you're taking me seriously in this tread, it's time to stop.
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri
Wouldn't this whole thing be better written in Smalltalk than in gcc?
gcc is more portable?
Couldn't Smalltalk output assembler that gcc could then compile?
I saw an assembler written in Smalltalk once. Hope I still have it.
It was very simple and clean looking.
I am writting a compiler for a l
I think that (part of) the point is to be able to bootstrap with minimal
tool support, and thereafter to be self-supporting. The bootstrap
process is described better than I can in Section 6.1 of "Accessible
Language-Based Environments of Recursive Theories", available on the
VPRI website. C is d
Hello Joshua,
Saturday, August 23, 2008, 9:42:38 AM, you wrote:
> I think that (part of) the point is to be able to bootstrap with minimal
> tool support, and thereafter to be self-supporting. The bootstrap
> process is described better than I can in Section 6.1 of "Accessible
> Language-Based E
So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
compiles C like code into machine code?
And then that machine code compiles Smalltalk like idst/Pepsi
into machine code? The idst/Pepsi compiles itself into machine
code. And this bootstrapping happens over and over again and
not just on
"Kjell Godo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
> compiles C like code into machine code?
idc is written in Pepsi. You may be confused because the bootstrap
.o.c files are included in the SVN checkout, at least until idc
targets Coke instead
Hello Kjell,
Saturday, August 23, 2008, 7:07:02 PM, you wrote:
> So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
> compiles C like code into machine code?
> And then that machine code compiles Smalltalk like idst/Pepsi
> into machine code? The idst/Pepsi compiles itself into machine
Derek Kuliński wrote:
> Hello Joshua,
>
> Saturday, August 23, 2008, 9:42:38 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>> I think that (part of) the point is to be able to bootstrap with minimal
>> tool support, and thereafter to be self-supporting. The bootstrap
>> process is described better than I can in Section 6
Michael FIG wrote:
> "Kjell Godo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
>> compiles C like code into machine code?
>>
>
> idc is written in Pepsi. You may be confused because the bootstrap
> .o.c files are included in the SVN checkou
So being without tools is better than being with tools because that
increases portability not to be dependent on anything. But I miss the
Squeak debugger. What debugger do you use for fonc?
So: If you had done it in Smalltalk instead of gcc:
Once you get fonc to compile on Squeak then you tell i
onclusion at low cost or fast,
it has been +30years from the first sustainable system
in computer media.
cheers,
Ale.
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Gargus
To: Fundamentals of New Computing
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [fonc] Coding Standards
Mich
Kjell,
Am 25.08.2008 um 01:18 schrieb Kjell Godo:
So being without tools is better than being with tools because that
increases portability not to be dependent on anything. But I miss
the Squeak debugger. What debugger do you use for fonc? [...]
I think one cannot overemphasise that this
Perhaps a loadable set of vim and emacs (and other) settings should be added
to the repository?
We should not do any thing different from what Ian has been doing, otherwise
the merge to upstream will be a nightmare.
Kurt
Steve Folta wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Karl Robillard
> <[E
Hi,
Kurt Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps a loadable set of vim and emacs (and other) settings should be added
> to the repository?
I'm pretty sure Ian is using something like the following (or a
derivative) for his Emacs smalltalk-mode:
http://piumarta.com/pepsi/old/pepsi-0.1/etc
Kurt Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We should not do any thing different from what Ian has been doing, otherwise
> the merge to upstream will be a nightmare.
Folks, judging from a few randomly selected files, the current code seems to
be a total hodge-podge of tabs and spaces. There is
24 matches
Mail list logo
