Hi,
I think there may have been some interest and subsequent difficulty
finding copies of my S3 slides. Just in case, I've uploaded them here:
http://piumarta.com/papers/S3-2008-slides.pdf
Cheers,
Ian
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://v
Ian,
Thanks for posting this. The 'Giants' slide (#40) is priceless. This
will be very helpful in my evangelizing of this project. Hope all is
well. Happy coding.
-Cornelius
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Ian Piumarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there may have been some inter
Title: Re: [fonc] s3 slides
Folks,
On
slide #42, Gezira, Shouldn't the top line be Max and not Min?
Otherwise every edge contributes at least 1 to every pixel, no matter
where it is! Or, am I grossly misunderstanding this?
On
slide #39, Maxwell's Equations, are you
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Ted Kaehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
> On slide #42, Gezira, Shouldn't the top line be Max and not Min?
> Otherwise every edge contributes at least 1 to every pixel, no matter where
> it is!
Hi Ted,
No, "min" is correct. The intention is that ev
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Dan Amelang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, "min" is correct. The intention is that every edge contributes at
> most 1. Using max instead would allow a contribution to exceed one
> (which would be incorrect).
Whoops! Although what I said about the min function i
On 13.06.2008, at 23:00, Dan Amelang wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Ted Kaehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Folks,
On slide #42, Gezira, Shouldn't the top line be Max and not
Min?
Otherwise every edge contributes at least 1 to every pixel, no
matter where
it is!
Hi Ted,
Dan,
Ah, the problem is that I did not know whether the summation
could be larger than 1.0 or not. I see now.
--Ted.
--
Ted Kaehler http://www.squeakland.org/~ted/
(home) 3261 Montecito Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89120. voice (702) 456-7930
Puzzle: Faucets in a bathroom sink can either ha
